Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Passport validity


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5481 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

This thread isn't a complaint against any holiday company etc, but rather a question that i need answering from anyone " in the know" about passport validity.

 

I and my family are due to fly to Spain in late september of this year for a fortnights holiday, meaning we obviously return somewhere around the 10th october.

three of my childrens passports expire in April 2010, and just out of curiosity i enquired with East Mids airport to make sure they was ok to fly because i had read that in some countries you needed at least 6 months left on your passport AFTER your return date.

East Mids replied that as far as they were concerned we were ok to travel, but suggested i check with my airline as it is their call.

I e-mailed TCX and they replied saying that i need written proof that it is ok to fly FROM THE SPANISH EMBASSY.

I couldnt find an e-mail address for that, but while i was looking i came accross the Foreign office website, and checked on their passport section under Spain. On there it states that there is " no period of validity for a passport provided that it lasts long enough to cover your return".

I e-mailed back to TCX and pasted the section into my e-mail.

They then rang me the day later to say they had received my e-mail BUT they still needed written proof from the Spanish Embassy.

I need help with this because it's doing my head in. I dont want to buy three new passports ( now they are teenagers, i'll have to pay for adult ones ), if i dont need them.

 

Does anyone know who's correct here, plus can anyone give me the e-mail and address of the Spanish Embassy i need to contact.

 

Thanks in anticipation for your help.

 

P.S

Here is the paragraph from the Foreign Office website....

 

"" Passport validity

 

A valid British passport must be held for entry to and exit from Spain. There is no minimum passport validity requirement but you should ensure that your passport is valid for the proposed period of your stay. ""

 

Why after reading this statement, do i need written proof from the Spanish Embassy ??????

Edited by bazak1

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks yourbank. There isnt a problem concerning visa's because i know we do not need one of those, but i'm totally confused as to why i need proof from the Embassy when EVERYTHING else seems to say i don't.

Thanks for the link though my friend.

Edited by bazak1

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote a long reply before realising that you'd said April 2010. :rolleyes: That will teach me.

 

I think you are being given the roundabout. Your passport is valid, full stop. Problems arise when passports run out during holidays, not after, and you're travelling within the EU.

 

I wouldn't give it a second thought, tbh.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Bookworm. That was my thoughts entirely, but with TCX informing me about needing the letter, i didn't want to turn up to the airport to be told i couldnt fly.

Thanks for the help.

I can rest easier now.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some countries DO require 6 months clear on a passport so I can understand why the airline is asking for this. I'm fairly sure Spain isn't one of them but it will be have been a 'stock' answer from a fairly low level employee. You don't even need a passport to travel within the EU - you do need a valid form of ID and a passport is one most us us have that the airlines accept.

 

Might be worth taking a screenshot of the FO website page and having that with you just in case you come up against another jobsworth at the airport.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Some countries DO require 6 months clear on a passport so I can understand why the airline is asking for this. I'm fairly sure Spain isn't one of them but it will be have been a 'stock' answer from a fairly low level employee. You don't even need a passport to travel within the EU - you do need a valid form of ID and a passport is one most us us have that the airlines accept.

Might be worth taking a screenshot of the FO website page and having that with you just in case you come up against another jobsworth at the airport.

 

Whilst it is true that some European countries don't check passports on arrival, the UK isn't one of them. The requirement for entry (as a Brit or European citizen) is to be able to prove both Identity and Nationality, so just carrying ID will fall short.

 

That doesn't mean that you would be refused entry, but you would be subjected to delays while further checks were made to confirm nationality, and you also run the risk of the airline refusing to carry you for fear of a £2000 fine under the Carriers Liability Act.

 

There are exceptions, such as the Republic of Ireland - not part of the UK, but still within Europe - The RoI however falls under the rules of the Common Travel Area (UK, RoI & Crown Dependencies).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for your comments and help.

Steve, true, i can renew their passports probably now and get them to continue the validity, but changing three childrens passports to adults at seventy some odd pounds each, is an expense that i don't need at the mo. paying for the holiday and trying to get some spending money is enough trouble.

thanks all the same.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Spain

Passport Required?BritishYesAustralianYesCanadianYesUSAYesOther EU1Visa Required?BritishNoAustralianNo/2CanadianNo/2USANo/2Other EUNoReturn Ticket Required?BritishNoAustralianNoCanadianNoUSANoOther EUNo

 

Passports

 

Passport valid for at least three months beyond length of stay required by all nationals referred to in the chart above except:

 

 

Hi almond.

 

As you can see, i've pasted the info' off the site you gave me link for. As you can see, this is yet another variant on the rules for length of validity AFTER the end of your holiday.

 

One site says, as long as it is in date when we return.

The site above states as long as it is valid for three months.

 

What is the actual, final truth ?

Edited by bazak1

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 months is all you need i always ask customers how long they have left

and advise them if its 5 months to get a new one since i have had a few that have booked a holiday and found a member of families passport has ran out.

 

Passport validity: A valid British passport must be held for entry to and exit from Spain. There is no minimum validity requirement but it must be valid for the proposed period of your stay.

http://www.spanish-airport-guide.com/travel-fact-sheet.html

Edited by almond
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Thanks Bookworm. That was my thoughts entirely, but with TCX informing me about needing the letter, i didn't want to turn up to the airport to be told i couldnt fly.

Thanks for the help.

I can rest easier now.

 

I would not ignore it as it will play on your mind if nothing else. On a recent trip to Spain ourselves I realized our son would have only had 5 months left on return and decided to check with TCX. They informed me that they would definately decline boarding as they state in their terms and condition that you need at least 6 months from the date of return. I had the same argument with them that it was needed for another EU country but to no avail. Therefore 3 days before travelling I had to get and an emergency renewal at additional costs:mad:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...