Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
    • Welcome to the Forum I have moved your topic to the appropriate forum  Residential and Commercial lettings/Freehold issues Please continue to post here.   Andy
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Changing job title and job descriptions


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5048 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I work for a company that is currently in the process of changing people's job titles and job descriptions. A number of people including myself have had their job title's and descriptions change from having very specific responsibilities mentioned to a very broad job title with vague responsibilities which will be shared amongst people who have been in the industry a number of years to people who have just joined and amongst different disciplines.

 

While work at this point have not indicated that my responsibilities will change I'm worried that my job description will no longer have these in them so once I sign a new contract they could just take those away I presume with no come back. Also my previous position was obtained during promotions while working for the company and In this way with everyone sharing the same job title and description I feel I have been demoted without cause.

 

Any advice on this issue would be great.

 

Thanks

J.W.

Edited by John W
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

I work for a company that is currently in the process of changing people's job titles and job descriptions. A number of people including myself have had their job title's and descriptions change from having very specific responsibilities mentioned to a very broad job title with vague responsibilities which will be shared amongst people who have been in the industry a number of years to people who have just joined and amongst different disciplines.

 

While work at this point have not indicated that my responsibilities will change I'm worried that my job description will no longer have these in them so once I sign a new contract they could just take those away I presume with no come back. Also my previous position was obtained during promotions while working for the company and In this way with everyone sharing the same job title and description I feel I have been demoted without cause.

 

Any advice on this issue would be great.

 

Thanks

Andre

 

 

Well, firstly a change of job description marks a change in contract terms, so obviously this has to be done by mutual consent.

 

While your employer does reserve the right to deploy staff as they see fit, if the redeployment means a complete chnge of what you are doing then basically you are being given a new job, hence they will need to issue a new contract.

 

If however they are tacking on extra responsibilities to your existing job, it is not unreasonable that you should be entitled to ask for extra pay to accomodate these extra responsibilities.

 

Have you been given written confirmation of what your new position will be, and what it will entail?.

 

To me, it seems like your employer is just trying to standardise staff employment T&Cs and peoples positions, probably to make it easier admin wise, as smetimes when a company takes on new work or new staff, the lines of who is responsible for who and who is responsible for what become unclear, so an occasional reorganisation is needed to help things run smoothly.

 

What i would do is sit and have an informal discussion with your boss about what is happenning, highlighting any concerns you have, if this discussion does not answer your questions to your satisfaction, then you can raise a written grievance asking for written confirmation of what the reorganisation entails, and what the come back of it is going to be on yourself.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for the reply I think your right they are trying to standardise things which is the driver behind this change I think. The real issue I have is that the job title / role they want me to take roughly maps to a job position below my current one. While a new role / position has been created which roughly maps description wise to my current one. I have always had good reviews while working for the company so I can not see any reason why they did this?

 

They have already given us new contracts which they expect us to sign and are having a consultation but later (after we have signed the contracts, I have not signed so far). I have raised the issue with my line manager but she has no answers.

 

Thanks

J.W.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

They have already given us new contracts which they expect us to sign and are having a consultation but later (after we have signed the contracts, I have not signed so far). I have raised the issue with my line manager but she has no answers.

 

right, the consultation should come first, as entrapment is generally frowned upon.

 

 

if your immediate manager does not have the answers you seek, then it is time to make things more formal.

Place a written grievance demanding that you be given answers to your questions in writing, verbal answers will no longer ba accepted.

 

You have made a reasonable request and as such you are entitled to a reasonable response, if all your manager can come up with is "dunno", then that is not satisfactory im afraid, as a manager, it is their job to manage.

If oyur manager is incapable of answering you questions, or is incapable of finding out the answers for you, then its probably time they stepped down, as it is clear that they lack a few basic abilities that are requirements for the position.

It is your legal right to ask questions when you are not certain about your employment conditions, and if they try to discipline you for asking a series of simple questions, then it raises the point that maybe there is some sort of ulterior motive behind the changes they are making, after all, if theyve nothing to hide, why hide it?.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply just to clarify a few points. What they have said so far is that the new contracts come into force at date x but they want us to sign them now but have a consultation before the date x comes. To me this is still very wrong as you are signing something that you dont' agree with although there may be valid reasons explained to you later.

 

Secondly for my managers response what they actaully said was they agreed with me in that they could not see why I was not at a position above what they are offering (i.e. my old position with slightly different wording) but apparently in the reshuffle none of the senior staff where asked about your abilities regarding mapping roles from the old to the new. This seems to have been purely a HR exercise.

 

Just thought I should be as clear as possible.

 

Thanks

J.W.

Link to post
Share on other sites

yeah,w ell like i said the change in circumstances should be explained to you BEFORE you sign anything, i mean you wouldnt sign up to an electricity supplier before hearing prices etc would you, this is no different.

 

Prior to signing you should know properly what this change means to you personally (sod everyone else!), aand its not unreasonable to ask questions.

 

Just ask for an informal meeting to discuss the changes with a senior manager or a HR reperesentative, and state that you will not agree to anything until you have had your mind put at rest. hll, if the explnation you recieve in the meeting is satisfactory enough then you could sign the new contract and hand it in there and then, like i say, this is not unreasonable and i cant see why your employers are being so coy and obstructive about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

These are many positions of Senior accountant department. It can include:

1. Senior accountant officer

2. Senior accountant coordinator

3. Senior accountant associate

4. Senior accountant executive

5. Senior accountant supervisor

6. Senior accountant specialist

7. Senior accountant director

8. Senior accountant manager

9. Senior accountant assistant manager

10. Senior accountant assistant

11. Senior accountant clerk

12.

 

Based on the above positions can help you to set up Senior accountant dept, design job descriptions, Senior accountant interview questions.

 

Apart from that, this link below may be useful: Senior accountant job description

I hope that this comment can help some info for our communities.

 

Rgs

Edited by nenupharvn
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...