Please allow me to pose a question
The scenario being that I have a claim for refund of bank charges stayed by First Direct ("FD") pending the OFT findings.
Subsequent to this, a BR order has been issued.
The OR/Trustee are too busy etc. to pursue anything and all matters have now been resolved pending discharge later this year.
On the assumption that judgement will fall in favour of the masses, who will subsequently get the benefit of the refunded charges?
I suspect that FD will seek to "lose" the charges and claim that they would not be refundable yet surely they should be re-paid to somebody.
For information, they were incurred prior to the BR period but, within the five years prior.
Surely they should be provided for the benefit of the creditors?
Please dont respond if you are only going to say BR therefore leave it to OR/Trustee etc as they either dont have the resource or inclination and thus allow the banks to rumble on and screw the average Joe.
Why should it be acceptable for the average person to be penalised and not the corporate body???
If I had known about this site 12 months ago things could have been very different for me know, its all about damage limitation.


Reply With Quote
