Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx  
    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention of peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now - post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!   Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.   Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.   A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Stolen car caused accident


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5111 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, i will keep this as short as possible, last year my son had an accident, when another car ploughed in to the side of his companies van, there where 3 witnesses to it , the driver of other car got out and run off, the police where called and they couldnt find the other driver, then we found out the car was stolen, none of the witnesses really got a good look at the other driver .Police contacted my son told him they had a suspect and they had sent the case on to the CPS to see if there was enough evidence to charge the suspect ,son got phone call to-day from the officer dealing with the case and he told him the case had been turned down by the CPS and there was nothing more that could be done, and they where dropping the case. My son was hurt in the accident can my son still lodge a claim as he was of sick for 2 weeks due to the accident

Thx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Singlechick.

 

I think that there is an organisation that deals with this type of situation. I'm not certain. Something that "rings a bell" in the back of my mind.

I'm sure that someone in the know will be able to clarify the position.

Just keep an eye on your thread.

 

Regards, Rooster.

If this has been useful to you, please click on the scales at bottom left of post. Thanks.

 

Advice & opinions of Rooster-UK are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Please use your own judgment.

-------------------------------------------------------

LOOK! Free CAG Toolbar.

Follow link for more information.

 

------------------------------------------------------

Please donate,

Help us to help others.

 

 

LINKS....

 

Forum Rules.

FAQs....

Link to post
Share on other sites

My son was hurt in the accident can my son still lodge a claim as he was of sick for 2 weeks due to the accident
As the driver is technically untraced as there is not enough evidence to charge the suspect any claim would have to be done through the Motor Insurers Bureau.

 

Accident claims

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rory is right,

 

even under the RTA (road traffic act) any claimant would need to provide fellon details (details of the thief), as this cant be done, because no felon has been found guilty, no insurer will deal.

 

Therefore it is left to the MIB.

 

I would approach a solicitor and get them to do the work for you, MIB Claims can be long and hard work!

 

good luck

Insurance Guy

If I can offer any help I will....

I have experience in Fault, Non-Fault & Disputed Liability Motor Claims for vehicle damage and hire, and some experience in Personal Injury Claims

 

 

If I've helped- please click my scales :D

 

ANY ASSISTANCE IS GIVEN ENTIRELY WITHOUT PREJUDICE- YOU SHOULD SEEK INDEPENDANT LEGAL ADVICE TO CONFIRM ANY ADVICE GIVEN

FEEL FREE TO PM ME A LINK TO YOUR THREAD IF YOU WOULD LIKE ADVICE 8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi everybody, I am new to this forum. Singlechic, I am sorry to hear of your plight. My daughters car was stolen over Xmas and involved in a similar accident. No one was arrested at the scene and her car was driven away and recovered a few days later. Her insurance company have said that they have to pay for the damage because it was her car involved even though it was reported stolen. Is this correct? It seem weird because I am sure they would not pay out if one of her friends or me had been driving it so why a thief. I don't mean to be insensitive to Singlechic but this is the other side of these stories.

Keep up the good work

 

Kathryn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because if they don't pay who do you think should. Your insurance as a minimum will almost certainly include Fire & THEFT. Also why should the entirely innocent victim pay they are even less liable than your daughter

Link to post
Share on other sites

The daughter is just as innocent as the "innocent victim". And why should her insurance pay up? SHE is insured to drive a SPECIFIC vehicle - determined by make, model and reg NO.

If someone else is driving that car without her consent or knowledge, then she should not be liable.

We are back to the usual insurance cop-out - Lets throw some money at it and it will go away.

Two years ago I was driving my car within the speed limit, taxed, tested and insured, perfectly roadworthy etc, when this idiot on a pushbike decided to pull away from the kerb without any warning and ended up under my car. He was very badly hurt.

I had a nightmare fighting the claim off - the police were all too ready for me to accept blame simply so he could claim. My insurance company were all too willing to pay up. thereby forcing me to lose 65% no-claims bonus.

So why should I pay because some idiot on a bike makes a bad call?

I got out of it in the end by threatening the insurance company with harrassment and false accusations, for which I was prepared to take them to court. Their actions would have cost me monetarily.

Keep fighting it - you did nothing wrong. Let them know that you wont be one of the many that simply roll over because it seems to be the easy option

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because if they don't pay who do you think should. Your insurance as a minimum will almost certainly include Fire & THEFT. Also why should the entirely innocent victim pay they are even less liable than your daughter

A stolen car is by definition uninsured (not even DOC as the owner's consent has not been obtained).

 

In England, the legal requirement is that the driver is insured, not the vehicle.

 

The daughter's insurers are not liable, the innocent party will need to claim against the Motor Insurers Bureau

 

The theft cover on the daughter's policy (if she has TPFT or Fully Comp) is designed to reimburse her for the loss (theft) of the car; not to provide insurance cover for the thief

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I recall you can only claim through the MIB for personal injury not material damage.

 

Also the owners insurer IS the insurer of last resort & even though stolen the car was and is insured it is hence the OP's daughter's insurer will pay

 

It's unfortunate but someone has to compensate the victim & this case the daughter's insurer is in the frame............had she not been insured & despite it's apparent unfairness she could have been sued by the owner of the damaged car

 

I realize the daughter is innocent but then so is the other owner more so & why should the latter suffer a loss because someone stole another's car........it's the lesser of 2 evils I'm afraid

Link to post
Share on other sites

TP is just that 3rd Party & that's that............ It would even apply if the driver was unlicensed in that the insurance would still be valid if they struck another.........the difference is they, the uninsured driver, would not be compensated just the TP

 

Also why is the daughter's insurer going to pay if they ain't liable........goodness of their heart...........I very much doubt it............ they are paying ........cos they is liable..simple as that

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi every-one... just a quick Question, my son got a letter from the solicitor thats dealing with his case, and has asked him to make an appointment to come in and see him, apperantly he has got the police report back and he wants to discuss it with him, but the only appointment he can get is 2 weeks away, as the solicitor is away on holidays, would any one know if this is routine , my son is the sort of person that would continuiously worry about it. It was him ask me to get in contact with yous.

Any help would be great Thx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi every-one... just a quick Question, my son got a letter from the solicitor thats dealing with his case, and has asked him to make an appointment to come in and see him, apperantly he has got the police report back and he wants to discuss it with him, but the only appointment he can get is 2 weeks away, as the solicitor is away on holidays, would any one know if this is routine , my son is the sort of person that would continuiously worry about it. It was him ask me to get in contact with yous.

Any help would be great Thx

 

Tell your son to relax...it will probably be something rather mundane and the solicitor simply wants clarification on some points. If it was that important the solicitor would have arranged an appointment before he went away and/or asked a colleague to deal with the matter in his absence.

 

On a related topic, it is worth bearing in mind is that the burden of proof for a criminal conviction, "beyond reasonable doubt" is significantly greater than that of the "balance of probability" needed in civil cases.

 

So, whilst the suspect may have escaped a criminal prosecution, there may be sufficient grounds to bring a civil case...although, if the person concerned has little or no assets, then there is little to be gained in pursuing this.

If you feel I've helped then by all means click my star to the left...a simple "thank you" costs nothing! ;)

 

Restons MBNA -v- WelshMam

 

MBNA Cards

 

CitiCard

M&S and More

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
As I recall you can only claim through the MIB for personal injury not material damage.

 

 

Hi JonCris

 

A bit late to post but I was trawling through the various posts.

 

You may know by now but you can claim for material damage and loss of property under the 2003 untraced drivers agreement with the MIB. There is a £300 reduction (a form of excess) for any claim for loss or damage to property.

 

I have a claim with the MIB for both property and injury.

 

Nearly five years now,!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...