Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for that "read me", It's a lot to digest, lots of legal procedure. There was one thing that I was going to mention to you,  but in one of the conversations in that thread it was mentioned that there may be spies on the Forum,  this is something that I've read quite some time ago in a previous thread. What I had in mind was to wait for the thirty days after their reply to my CCA request and then send the unenforceable letter. I was hoping that an absence of signature could be the Silver Bullet but it seems that there are lot of layers to peel on this Onion.  
    • love the extra £1000 charge for confidentialy there BF   Also OP even if they don't offer OOC it doesn't mean your claim isn't good. I had 3 against EVRi that were heard over the last 3 weeks. They sent me emails asking me to discontinue as I wouldn't win. Went infront of a judge and won all 3.    Just remember the law is on your side. The judges will be aware of this.   Where you can its important to try to point out at the hearing the specific part of the contract they breached. I found this was very helpful and the Judge made reference to it when they gave their judgements and it seemed this was pretty important as once you have identified a specific breach the matter turns straight to liability. From there its a case of pointing out the unlawfullness of their insurance and then that should be it.
    • I know dx and thanks again for yours and others help. I was 99.999% certain last payment was over six years ago if not longer.  👍
    • Paragraph 23 – "standard industry practice" – put this in bold type. They are stupid to rely on this and we might as well carry on emphasising how stupid they are. I wonder why they could even have begun to think some kind of compelling argument – "the other boys do it so I do it as well…" Same with paragraph 26   Paragraph 45 – The Defendants have so far been unable to produce any judgements at any level which disagree with the three judgements…  …court, but I would respectfully request…   Just the few amendments above – and I think it's fine. I think you should stick to the format that you are using. This has been used lots of times and has even been applauded by judges for being meticulous and clear. You aren't a professional. Nobody is expecting professional standards and although it's important that you understand exactly what you are doing – you don't really want to come over to the judge that you have done this kind of thing before. As a litigant in person you get a certain licence/leeway from judges and that is helpful to you – especially if you are facing a professional advocate. The way this is laid out is far clearer than the mess that you will get from EVRi. Quite frankly they undermine their own credibility by trying to say that they should win simply because it is "standard industry practice". It wouldn't at all surprise me if EVRi make you a last moment offer of the entire value of your claim partly to avoid judgement and also partly to avoid the embarrassment of having this kind of rubbish exposed in court. If they do happen to do that, then you should make sure that they pay everything. If they suddenly make you an out-of-court offer and this means that they are worried that they are going to lose and so you must make sure that you get every penny – interest, costs – everything you claimed. Finally, if they do make you an out-of-court offer they will try to sign you up to a confidentiality agreement. The answer to that is absolutely – No. It's not part of the claim and if they want to settle then they settle the claim as it stands and don't try add anything on. If they want confidentiality then that will cost an extra £1000. If they don't like it then they can go do the other thing. Once you have made the amendments suggested above – it should be the final version. court,. I don't think we are going to make any more changes. Your next job good to make sure that you are completely familiar with it all. That you understand the arguments. Have you made a court familiarisation visit?
    • just type no need to keep hitting quote... as has already been said, they use their own criteria. if a person is not stated as linked to you on your file then no cant hurt you. not all creditors use every CRA provider, there are only 3 main credit file providers mind, the rest are just 3rd party data sharers. if you already have revolving credit on your file there is no need to apply for anything just 'because' you need to show you can handle money. if you have bank account(s) and a mortgage which you are servicing (paying) then nothing more can improve your score, despite what these 'scam' sites claiml  its all a CON!!  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help. Welcome PPI reply includes a claim questions form about phone recordings?!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5495 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All.

 

Sent off my original claim / complaint letter a couple of weeks back to Welcome.

 

Have had a letter back today stating they are keen to handle my complaint and that they will get the following from their files

 

- The recording of the phone call during which the insurance was first mentioned to you

- Copies of the documents we would have sent to you at the time

- The script that was in place at the time

- Records relating to the individual who spoke to you

 

It then yammers on and says they dont feel they can accept my complaint.

 

Then it says to fill out an included question form that asks about when I first became aware I had a complaint, my exact reasons for the complaint, what i remember from when i took out the policy, what documents was I given, details of my job at the time etc.

 

What do I have to do now? Do I need to fill this in? Can I just move to continue the complaint? Are they actually likely to have recordings? I doubt it as I am sure I spoke with a 3rd party guy from netcars or similar.

 

Would appreciate any advice or help, especially from those that are aware of this reply from them.

 

If needed I can copy in / scan in the letter but I have pretty much covered it above.

 

Many thanks in advance! :)

 

Dave

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello itrends,

 

welcome to the PPI forum:)

 

Hi All.

 

Sent off my original claim / complaint letter a couple of weeks back to Welcome.

 

Have had a letter back today stating they are keen to handle my complaint and that they will get the following from their files

 

- The recording of the phone call during which the insurance was first mentioned to you

- Copies of the documents we would have sent to you at the time

- The script that was in place at the time

Above in red is all that they are required to supply to you under a Sujbect Access Request within the requirements of the Data Protection Act 1998.

- Records relating to the individual who spoke to you (As above)

It then yammers on and says they dont feel they can accept my complaint. If they have not yet supplied the information then how can they possibly accept your complaint? you will need the information so you can establish a viable complaint.

Then it says to fill out an included question form that asks about when I first became aware I had a complaint, (in answer to this you state that you have only become aware of the issue of PPI mis-selling due to the massive media coverage in recent months and therefore you have decided to proceed with a claim for mis-selling. my exact reasons for the complaint, (Mis-sold to you and you will have to provide reasons ie Pre existing medical conditions. self employed etc) Please see these links..........

For claims before 2005 and the FSA ruling from which campaign

How to tell if you’ve been mis-sold PPI

Quick check: were you mis-sold? - How to tell if you’ve been mis-sold PPI

 

all above in here and much more useful information

 

links

 

what i remember from when i took out the policy, what documents was I given, details of my job at the time etc. You are making the claim/complaint let them dig up the information it is up to them to refute the claim for mis-selling not for you to provide any evidence of it. However if you have original documents keep them safe as documents produced by the banks etc can have a stack of information missing.

 

What do I have to do now? Do I need to fill this in? They can ask you to provide information to help them find all the records but IMHO this is a delaying tactic as I supplied info via a questionnaire and copies of documents and today 13 months later and 2 months after settlement they are still sending me special delivery envelopes stuffed with additional info due to the involvement of the Information Commissioners Office. Can I just move to continue the complaint? If you have had a final response then straight to the Financial Ombudsman Service or Courts. your choice. Are they actually likely to have recordings? I doubt it as I am sure I spoke with a 3rd party guy from netcars or similar. If they have recordings they should have been produced to you under the Subject Access Request or at least transcripts of the recordings.

Would appreciate any advice or help, especially from those that are aware of this reply from them.

 

If needed I can copy in / scan in the letter but I have pretty much covered it above.

 

Many thanks in advance! :-)

 

Dave

 

Hope this helps you out, keep asking and someone will assist I am sure:-)

 

aa

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again all, I have put together my reply to their letter. I wonder if someone may be able to have a read and pull me up on anything that I might be better off not saying, or indeed if I have neglected to included something....

 

 

 

-------

 

 

I refer to my letter dated 15th February 2009 in which I wrote asking for justification that the insurance sold with my loan was sold fairly, reasonably and within my best interests.

 

I am writing in response to your letter dated 23rd February 2009, with regards the insurance sold with my car loan / HP. Your reference is COMP/XXXXX

 

I have included answers to some of your questions as requested, however as you have not provided me with a transcript copy of the recordings, the script in place at the time or documents from the time that the loan was taken out that you mention, I do not feel your letter has offered a satisfactory justification that my policy was sold fairly, reasonably and within my best interests so I request that you look into my complaint again alongside the additional information I have provided as requested by you.

 

The replies to your questions are as follows:

 

When did I become aware that I had a complaint?

I have only become aware of the issue of PPI mis-selling due to the massive media coverage in recent months and therefore have decided to proceed with a claim for mis-selling.

 

Exact reasons for the complaint:

To the best of my recollection, at the time of sale / loan provision I was informed that I was required to take out PPI insurance on the loan amount. I have since discovered this is not a requirement. Additionally the form that was sent had those options pre-ticked and as such was not an option that I made while filling in the form.

 

I have also since found that no documentation was sent to me that detailed the PPI or what it covered / would cover. On re-reading my agreement it makes mention of ‘leaflets’ that would be provided, however no such documentation / ‘leaflets’ were provided. I have kept all original documentation along with separate photo copies within my files during the duration of this HP agreement alongside all the documentation from the car sales office which has allowed me to confirm that this was the case.

 

What do I remember from the time the policy was taken out?

All the communication aside from forms was done over the telephone. As far as I can recollect this was done with an agent on behalf of Welcome Finance in conjunction / as a result of referral from an online car search website. Although the agent I communicated with was polite and helpful, it does appear that the loan itself was miss sold as a result of my above stated reasons and those I included within my initial letter to you on the 15th of February 2009.

 

As stated in my original letter, unless you can satisfactorily justify to me that the policy was fair and reasonable I am requesting a full refund of all premiums, and subsequent interest on these payments, that I have paid to date. As I believe I have been deprived of this money I also expect 8% statutory interest, the amount a court would award, to be added to each payment made.

 

If I do not receive a more favorable response within 14 days I shall be taking my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman which is a step you have also put forward as a recommendation within your letter dated 23rd of February.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

hello itrends,

 

I refer to my letter dated 15th February 2009 where I asked for justification that the insurance sold with my loan was sold fairly, reasonably and within my best interests.

 

I am writing in response to your letter dated 23rd February 2009, with regards the insurance sold with my car loan / HP. Your reference is COMP/XXXXX

 

I have included answers to some of your questions as requested, however despite my request you have failed to provide me with a transcript copy of the recordings, or the relevant documents applicable to the agreement from the time that the loan was taken out. I do not feel your letter has offered a satisfactory justification that my policy was sold fairly, reasonably and within my best interests. I now insist that you look into my complaint again alongside the additional information I have provided as requested by you.

 

The replies to your questions are as follows:

 

When did I become aware that I had a complaint?

I have only become aware of the issue of PPI mis-selling due to the massive media coverage in recent months and therefore have decided to proceed with a claim for mis-selling.

 

Exact reasons for the complaint:

At the time of sale / loan provision I was informed that I was required to take out PPI insurance on the loan amount. I have since discovered due to massive media coverage that this is not a requirement. Additionally the form that was sent had the PPI options pre-ticked and as such did not allow me to make my own decision on the options while filling in the form.

 

I have also since found that no documentation was sent to me that detailed the PPI or what conditions it covered or indeed excluded. On reading my agreement it makes mention of ‘leaflets’ that would be provided, however no such documentation / ‘leaflets’ were provided. I have kept all original documentation along with separate photocopies within my files during the duration of this HP agreement alongside all the documentation from the car sales office which has allowed me to confirm that this was the case.

 

What do I remember from the time the policy was taken out?

All of the communications other than the forms was done over the telephone. This was done with an agent on behalf of Welcome Finance in conjunction / as a result of referral from an online car search website. Although the agent I communicated with was polite and helpful, it does appear that the loan itself was mis-sold as a result of my above stated reasons and those I included within my initial letter to you on the 15th of February 2009.

 

As stated in my original letter, unless you can satisfactorily justify to me that the policy was fair and reasonable I am requesting a full refund of all premiums, and subsequent interest on these payments, that I have paid to date. As I believe I have been unreasonably deprived of this money I also expect 8% statutory interest, the amount a court would award, to be added to each payment made.

 

If I do not receive a more favorable response within 14 days I shall be taking my complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service which is a step you have also put forward as a recommendation within your letter dated 23rd of February. Unless I receive a favourable response within the timescale stated above I will accept your letter dated 23rd February as a final response and submit a full and formal complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

Yours faithfully,

 

I have made a few changes to your letter of which I hope you will approve.

 

also please see my thread......

 

***Long fight but, WON***

 

if you look at links 91, 96, 116 and 117 you will see my claim letters to RBS if you can use anything in them to bulk up your letter please feel free but remember my case was on pre existing medical conditions.

 

aa;)

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

this is exactly what has happened to me my friend, today i just looked at my paper work to see if can claim on my ppi with welcome finance as im off work and started reading about ppi cover, i was also told by them that i had to take it out otherwise i wudnt get the loan for the car i wanted, and they also sent me that paper work with the ppi section already ticked, i cant believe them, i am aslo going to file a complaint.

 

i dont know if you have realised they have also charged credit for insurances for over a £1000, well my paper work show that. please can anyone help me on how to deal with this.

 

thank you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello maani,

 

this is exactly what has happened to me my friend, today i just looked at my paper work to see if can claim on my ppi with welcome finance as im off work and started reading about ppi cover, i was also told by them that i had to take it out otherwise i wudnt get the loan for the car i wanted, and they also sent me that paper work with the ppi section already ticked, i cant believe them, i am aslo going to file a complaint.

 

i dont know if you have realised they have also charged credit for insurances for over a £1000, well my paper work show that. please can anyone help me on how to deal with this.

 

thank you

 

You will need to start your own thread so all the relevant details on your case can be kept in your own area. This will cover any questions you may have and the responses from caggers with help.

 

Please see the top of the forum for starting a thread button and take it from there. Put in a title a user name/

handle but do not use your own name or any other personal details on addresses, accounts, sort codes, telephone numbers etc. You know it makes sense in the world of identity theft:eek:

 

good luck;)

 

aa

Edited by alanalana
speling again

I have no legal training and the advice I offer is a matter of support. Before you commit to any Legal action you are advised to contact a qualified legal practitioner.

------------------------------------------------

Bank charge successes:

Halifax - Full settlement incl interest.

HSBC - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 75% of claim.

RBS - Settlement, goodwill no admission of liability about 70% of claim.

2 ongoing claims for bank charges with HSBC with more to come. (Supreme Court ruling could have upset these claims) They did :mad:

PPI Successes

PPI 4 settlements on 9 loans. FOS involvement on 7 added on the 8 % Statutory interest another 30% to both.

2 claims settled in full with LV without FOS involvement.

2 claims settled in full with HSBC without FOS involvement

 

PPI Claims ongoing with:

Cap one Now with the FOS

Barclays. Paid up today 24/04/10 cheque received for over £4,500 and in the bank.

LTSB still have to decide on this as their SAR production was abysmal. Papers data mixed up documents missing etc

 

1 Complaint not upheld by FOS they said it was ICO issue. Complaint upheld by ICO. See this..

Post 290 from

***RBS PPI Claim Long fight but, WON***

 

Please do not PM me for advice as it may be sometime before I can respond.

 

Keep at them. Do not give way and do not accept all they tell you, they will delay and stall for as long as they can to prevent repaying you your mis-sold PPI.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well fingers crossed. I just printed and signed and am posting first thing in the morning.

 

I wondered if it is worth saying that I would accept closure of the loan instead of a refund? I only have until the end of the year left and have paid WAYYYYY more than the cost of the car. :)

 

Anywho, lets see what they say. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...