Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • if i remember rightly, long ago in one of the first drafts of the old proposed gov't overhauls, there was a listing of recommended 'charges' that inc wrong reg = £20. some PPC's implemented such changes in advance. then later as it looked increasing likely the new code was never going to be implemented after it's 1st review and another set of codes was to be debated they all quietly revert back .......... dx
    • Potentially it may not even get sold on? Just the default left for 6 years then gone? but if it is sold on ill get a letter from the DCA which is the notice of assignment? Sorry what is the different between a default notice and a default cal marker? yes, i may try and work arrangements out with the OCs after the breathing space but I'll see my circumstances then thank you again for all your help and patience, I really appreciate it and apologies If i am too fast or repeating myself.
    • receiving a default NOTICE (forget simple default cal markers) does not mean it will get sold on... OC's very very rarely do court themselves.  if it does you would receive a Notice of Assignment from the debt buyer/DCA.  as for reduced payment if it remains with the OC and they issue a DN, no harm in trying but lets get all your ducks inline first. dx  
    • okay thanks do you know how long it will take for it to get to the DCA or could the OC try and issue a CCJ? even though it's unlikely also for example would the OC agree to a reduction and a small payment over a super lengthy period of time if agreed? Rather than go through chasing apologies again for all the questions, just trying to understand all the possible scenarios.  
    • Currently - "the maximum daily price at 100p / kWh for electricity and 30p / kWh for gas – keep in mind that's a lot higher than the Ofgem Energy Price Cap, so if you can't afford prices to increase further, you're probably better off sticking with a protected tariff such as Flexible Octopus." Octopus Tracker is a product of our labs, available now to customers through our beta programme. Octopus Tracker is a beta product. Some things may not work the first time, and installations and processes may take longer than we'd like. Third party tech like In-home Displays won't always work, and on occasion data issues with smart meters can take significant time to fix or prevent things from working at all.   Copied straight from octopus   Feel free to shove it somewhere else    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim on my insurance for an accident which did not happen. Threats to cancel policy


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5540 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Sorry this is such a long post to start with - I thought I was OK dealing with this on my own until I got to letter three and started to feel it was going a bit pear shaped!

 

Last Friday I received a letter from my insurers (HSBC) which reads as follows:

 

We have been notified of an accident involving your vehicle on the above date by a third party, but cannot trace having received notification from you.

 

The third party is holding the driver of your vehicle responsible for causing the accident. They are alleging that a *** *** (name omitted) was driving your vehicle and that your vehicle reversed into the other party's parked vehicle.

 

There is no *** *** covered to drive your vehicle under your policy. If this person was driving your vehicle with your permission we assume that you ensured beforehand that they were insured to drive your vehicle under the terms of their own policy.

 

Please therefore let us have details of their insurers within 7 days including the name and policy number so that we may redirect the claim.

 

If in fact it was yourself or a named driver driving your vehicle at the time of the accident, please complete and return the attached accident report form as soon as possible and at the latest within 7 days so that we may deal with this matter on your behalf.

 

If your vehicle has not been driven by *** *** and has not been involved in any incident please telephone me on receipt of this letter

 

If you wish to discuss this matter, please telephone on the number shown below

The form I was sent detailed the time of the alleged accident as 00:00 31st December 2008 and apparently it occurred in Staffordshire.

 

My car was parked at home (Cheshire), with the keys in the house, while I slept at that time. Neither do I know anyone called *** ***. A quick google search reveals that a person by this name (quite unusual) works for Staffordshire County Council, so my guess is that the numberplate has been misreported.

 

Ayway, I called the number given to explain and followed the call with this letter:

 

"Further to our conversation today I am returning the form sent out to me entitled “Particulars of Motor Accident”. I have not filled out this form as the alleged accident involving my car did not occur. I was in charge of the vehicle for the whole of 31st December 2008 and do not know any individual by the name of *** ***.

 

My recollection of 31st December 2008 is as follows. From around 10.30pm 30th December I was asleep, with the car parked in the private driveway of my previous address: (address given). The car remained here until I left for work at approximately 8am, arriving at work at approximately 8.30. My route took me (route detailed) to my place of work. I left work at 7pm following the same route home. After my arrival home the car remained parked, again on the private driveway, until 2nd January 2009. Whilst I cannot recall if I made a short journey during the day to buy my lunch I was not involved in any accident of any kind.

 

I can also confirm that there has been no work done on my car since repairs following storm damage which occurred in March 2008."

Now, I renewed my insurance (still with HSBC, but under a new broker) on 20th January, so the attempted claim is on my old policy. Today I received a letter regarding my current policy which reads:

 

WHilst checking your no claims discount proof we have been made aware of a claim you made in the last five years which was not disclosed to us at the time the polilcy was taken out.

 

In order for us to accurately rate your policy it is imperative we receive full details of this incident within 7 days. Failure to respond will leave us no option but to cancel this policy. Once we are aware of the details of the incident we can update your records, however this may result in an increase in your premium ro your policy being placed with a different underwriter.

 

We look forward to hearing from you

So they are now threatening to cancel my policy. I called them to check it was this claim they are referring to (I made a claim in March 08 for storm damage to my car - the roof blew off our shed and sanded the paintwork) and it is. When I called the guy dealing with the "claim" he told me that whilst it is being dealt with the brokers could ask to increase my premium which would be refunded if the claim was not paid out on. Can they really do this? Is that not extortative? This could get really expensive because of the previous claim in the year (although I did protect my NCB I think only one is allowed per year).

 

Following my chat with him I called back to the number on todays letter and was assured that my policy would not be cancelled now that I had given them the details, and although I took the operative's name and extension he refused to give me this in writing. I'd really appreciate any advice on what to do next. My first thought is to construct a reply to the sender of the letter threatening cancellation giving details of the phonecall made where they promised not to. What do you think?

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alas, it is usual for a new or renewed policy to have the premium increased as though there was a claim until the issue is settled (in which case the additional premiums will be returned). They cannot (I believe) increase your premium midway through a policy.

 

Mistaken identities are quite common and should be sorted out rather quickly. You will be best contacting your old insurer and ask them what they have done (or not) and get them to correct their records. You could of course ask your current insurer to do this, but I suspect they will want you to do the donkey work (seeing as their precious targets will probably be missed sorting this out, though this is not an excuse).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks very much for your reply and sorry for my delay in getting back - been away for the weekend.

 

Hopefully I have gone some way to resolve this. I decided to bite the bullet and email the person I thought may have been the driver. They have confirmed that it is a mistake and that they were involved in a bump (not in my car!) as I suspected so hopefully I can get this sorted fairly quickly.

 

As I paid £450ish up front for the policy it may be that the insurer demands a significant quantity anyway before things are sorted. Is there anyway I can avoid this. I have other things to spend the money on right now, even if I will get it back later, and this whole thing has already been pretty costly to me in terms of time and stress!

 

Thanks again

NatWest Charges: £3708.81. Allocated to fast track 14/10/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 23/10/06 5% donation made

 

HSBC Default Removal and £186 charges: N1 claim issued 28/11/06 *WON* 28/02/07 5% donation made

 

Egg Charges: £370. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/01/07 5% donation made

 

Natwest Student: £150. N1 claim issued 24/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 10/12/06 5% donation made

Natwest Credit card: £317.01 INCLUDING CONTRACTUAL INTEREST, *WON* 30/11/06 5% Donation Made

 

Ikano Data Protection Act deception and non-complience: N1 claim issued 28/11/06. *SETTLED IN FULL* 12/12/06 5% donation made

I am not a lawyer. All advice is merely my own opinion. Nevertheless, I've won £4675 so far!

Tip my scales if you like my advice :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It really is a case of getting your previous insurer to amend heir records. A letter with the details of the other driver should sort this out, and hopefully quickly. However if you need he insurance sooner, you may need to pay the additional premium and get a refund once it is sorted out.

 

But do contact the last insurer as it is they, with incorrect records, who are causing this problem and it is they who need to sort it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...