Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not prosecuting in the public interest seems to be bandied about on forums frequented by students. I don't think I've ever seen a prosecution not go ahead because of that. You would have to define why it isn't in the public interest to prosecute someone who isn't paying their way and is costing other travellers more. I can't think of a reason. HB
    • we have known for a very very long time that 9/10 the OC never knows IRRWW are chasing debtors nor  in some cases even taking money from them that the OC never ever see!! IDRWW pockets it -  free money - lets all go on a staff holiday. there was an article some years back whereby that quoted some +£4M debtors had paid to IDRWW on UAE debts that when contacted the originating banks knew nothing about....😎  
    • let the ombudsman do their job. you'll win handsdown you dont obv owe OVO p'haps anything at all.  dont worry about Past Due credit or any other DCA ( THEY ARE NOT BAILIFFS!) as for you being added to the debt, thats quite OK, you were a resident adult and equally liable under law. once you start getting things moving via the  ombudsman dont forget to get your credit files cleansed of any negative data & seek compensation for distress etc, again the  ombudsman should sort both out for you. as you are now NOT a customer of OVO, there is very very little they can do to you now.  
    • A question - did you use the supermarket or the restaurant? I see the restrictions are different. Sign.pdf
    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unacceptable repair - advice needed please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5547 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

On 21st January I found that some *nice person* had stolen the front bumper/lights section of my horsebox leaving me with this mess

 

I informed the police immediately, and then rang my insurance company to let them know I would be making a claim. They told me to leave it with them to organise an approved repairer and they would be in contact. The repairer then contacted me to arrange to collect the lorry (after they asked me to drop it in to them - yeah with no lights/indicators - right!!), and told me they were in Gloucester which is a good 70 miles from me.

 

They duly sent a recovery truck that night - brilliant I thought. I then found out that they were a CAR repairer not a commercial repairer.

 

Last Thursday (5th Feb) I was told it was ready for collection, so went up to get it.

 

When I arrived a man came up and said that he just had to put a footplate on the front of it - which he had just taken off his brothers lorry as he hadn't been sure what had gone in the hole in the middle of the bumper!!!

 

Standing there I was quite sure that the bumper was wonky. I went into the office and found notices on the walls stating that if you were not happy with repairs you should contact your insurance company.

 

I have taken my lorry to my mechanic for him to have a look. He is 99% certain that it is a repaired, not a new bumper. On the drivers side where the wonkiness is, it is structurally weak and can be moved about a lot. If it wasn't repaired, but new, then something has happened to it to make it like that. The bumper itself is not straight, it is not just that it has been put on wrongly. They also completely missed out some parts that need to be fitted behind the bumper.

 

I have contacted the insurance company to complain, and have been told that the garage have to have the chance to rectify the problems.

 

I really don't want it to go back there. They are going to have a cob on anyway that I have dared to complain about them, and I'm worried! They don't even work on commercial vehicles.

 

Besides all that it's another 140 miles and loads of fuel for the journey.

 

Can the insurance company (Highway) insist that it goes back for rectification? Or is there some way that I can have my own choice of repairer from now on?

 

Thanks for reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The insurers can insist that the work is rectified by repairers of their choice but you should not have to be put to any expense and if you have suffered any expense so far then you should recover it - subject to excess and any provision in the insurance contract.

 

Keep photos all the time.

Write to the insurers inform them that the work is substandard and say why. Give them 7 days to have the shoddy work sorted out or else you will go to your own repairer and sue them for the money.

Include a quote for the job from your own repairer. make sure that it is a quote for a good acceptable job to you.

 

Then send it all of and do precisely what you have threatened to do.

If you are not prepared to go ahead with your threat then don't bother in the first place.

Do not deal with anyone on the phone without recording the call.

Get a call recorder.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for your reply.

 

I sat last night and wrote a letter to the insurance company, cc to the repair center, outlining the problems and what the vehicle needs for rectification, enclosing photographs of when I bought the horsebox in November 2008, and after repair.

 

Will see what happens next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...