Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Abolish Business Rates


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5546 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Being a business owner I have had my on going issues with regard to business rates . One policy I have always felt ridiculous is the 50% rate reduction if you have one business , yet more than one brings 100% liability on all. This government does not encourage entrepeneurship with such stupid policies. Of course more than one business with rent/overheads would automatically bring you into VAT registration another headache and potentially crippling.

With the current economic climate surley the governmant should take steps to directly help small businesses who make up 60% of the economy by slashing if not abolishing business rates altogether. I was interested if there was any plans to introduce a direct relief and found this from 2007.

Government ?should reduce business rates?, says FPB | Growing Business

I intend to raise this issue with my local MP and wondered if there were any thoughts or further info on the matter in this forum.

 

Thanks

 

Tumble

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lobbying Parliament

Parliament changes laws and tells the government which policies to follow and actions to take.

Contact your MP

MPs are there to represent you. This is why it is important to campaign and lobby them; it is their job to

listen. MPs are so keen for young people to be involved in politics that they WILL make an extra effort for

you.

There are 646 constituencies in the UK. The Member of Parliament (MP) in your constituency is your representative

in the House of Commons. Give him/her the opportunity to represent your views, by telling

them what your views are!

Remember: MPs want to get re-elected, so if an issue is important to their constituent, it is important to

them.

Lobbying works!

In order to remain in power, the Prime Minister and his or her Government must be able to get support

for their main policies from the House of Commons. This includes getting their proposed new laws (bills)

approved, and deciding on foreign policy.

At the moment, because the Labour Party does not have a large majority in the House of Commons (only

66), the views of every single MP are vital in determining whether or not the Government can successfully

pass a certain policy.

This means that if an MP is encouraged to take a certain position on an issue by their constituents, they are

in a good position to challenge the government's stance.

Write to your MP:

Most of the time MPs are best contacted initially by letter to the House of Commons:

House of Commons

Westminster

London SW1A 0AA

Tel Switchboard: 0207 219 3000

You can suggest a meeting, if you think it will be useful, in which case offer to come to the Hose when it is

convenient, and stress that it will take no more than 10-15 minutes of their time.

Many MPs still gauge the strength of public opinion on an issue by the number of letters they receive on

the subject from their constituents. This fact is surprisingly ender-exploited by pressure groups in the UK.

However, research shows that the pre-printed form letters or postcards, which the individual just has to

sign and send off, are very much less effective.

Produced by the Council for Arab-British Understanding (CAABU), 1 Gough Square, London EC4A 3DE, tel: 0207 832 1310 fax: 0207 832 1329

web: CAABU :: The Council for Arab-British Understanding email: [email protected]

LOBBYING

Link to post
Share on other sites

As business rates are effectively the business form of council tax, I am interested in hearing how you would justify such an abolishment, when it would simply put pressure on council tax rates, and inevitably pass the cost onto ordinary homeowners.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember when I started a business in 1989.

Both Wigan and Warrington Councils had incentives for new small business and offered free Business rates-I think for the first 6 months and 12 months respectively.

The first year are the most difficult times for new businesses with an estimated 60% failing in this period.

 

I remember my own Council would not offer any discounts.This encouraged many to look outside St.Helens.

 

However,we all know that Business rates are a big source of income for councils,and they would have to claw this back from other areas if they were to offer it.

It could only work if it was subsidised by central Gov.

 

Ironically it was Business rates that was responsible for the demise of my shop-although it was Barclays who played the bigger part.

 

They withdrew my standing orders and direct debit facilities-meaning an arrangement I had was not being met.As a result of that the Council called in the Baliffs-who demanded the full years amount.

I managed to make a payment arrangement with them-but after they had added fees and costs etc it turned out to be quite a bit.

 

Unlike a private individual,if you are running a shop,then you cannot keep the front door closed.

 

The secret of survial in business in the early days,are to keep your costs down-but there are some costs which are unavoidable.

I am in agreement that Business rates are one such cost that can make a big difference.

 

Whether St.Helens Council or Prescot and Knowsley will look into this Tumble is another matter.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In reply to spost 3 I know of five small businesses in the past seven weeks that have closed due soley to business rates . Three of the premises belong to the council, empty shops equal no revenue of any description to these councils so somewhere along the line if the climate continues gonna cost council tax payers a hell of a lot more regardless. As Martin pointed out there is no locking the door and trying to negotiate they take what they can and your finished. And dont forget business owners pay council tax too on their private dwellings. The government are pledging support to small business through the banks . Why not give direct relief- cost less to administrate and lets face it what bank is interested in the small business sector . There is a row of shops down the road from where I live, two have closed down recently , I honestly dont know the circumstances of their closure yet but it doesnt look good does it closed shops and I know of others struggling . Council tax goes to the local council , business rates goes straight to the government . Business rates are the most destructive when it comes to non payment. I say abolish them and give direct support at least for a couple of years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...