Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
    • The sign says "Parking conditions apply 24/7". Mind you, that's after a huge wall of text. The whole thing is massively confusing.  Goodness knows what you're meant to do if you spend only a fiver in Iceland or you stay a few minutes over the hour there.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help- Third Party is Lying!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5386 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am new to this site but I am in need of advice!!!

 

I was involved in a car accident 2 weeks ago. I was driviing down a clear main road and there was no traffic. On the opposite side of the road was bumper to bumper traffic. I was travelling at 30 mph when a car pulled out from a side road straight in front of me. I hit the passenger side of his car. The man admitted fault and we exchanged details.

 

I thought it was a clear cut claim and it would be settled in no time.

 

Until i recevied a phone call from my insurance today informing me the man is disputing liability!!!! The man is claiming I overtook a vehicle (which is impossible to do on this road unless the traffic is clear on both sides, whihc is was not) and he has emerged from the side road and i have gone into the back of him!

 

My bumper and bonnet was damaged in the collison and his passenger side back door and wheel arch was damaged! However he is claiming i have gone into the back of him.

 

I am really worried about being found at fault even though i know what truly happened. I am worried he has previous damage to the back of his vehicle and he has had the damage from the collision repaired!

 

Will this incident be likely to be found in my favour.

 

(there were no witnesses and no police/ambulance involved!)

 

THANKS!

Link to post
Share on other sites

The pattern of damage done to the car does not support his story.

 

If you had run into the back of him then his damage would be to the rear, and not to the side, and if you had cut back in having overtaken someone and hit his side then your damage would be to your side and not the front.

 

The only way that you could have damage to the front of the car and him to his side would be if he had come across your path.

 

I would fill in your form, put in as much detail as you can and allow your insurance company to deal with it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As flyingdoc has already said, additionally, point out to them that even if it was possible for you to have being overtaking at the time of the accident it would have been a legal move and the onus of responsibility is on the driver pulling out to ENSURE BOTH WAYS are clear before doing so

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recommend you issue a letter to your insurance company explaining exactly what occured and your concerns.

 

I will predict the insurance company will appoint a loss adjuster to assist with the validation process and recovery aspect of the claim.

 

Loss adjusters will listen to both sides and locate any discrepancies. Especially when the damage does not correspond to the third parties Statement of Fact.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much for you replies. The tp is still making the claim i hit him in the back, which has meant i have had to pay my excess of £575 to get my car back! Like you all say his discrepancies will hopefully show i am telling the truth!

Link to post
Share on other sites

as far as i know, no. i have been trying to emphasise to them the fact he is blatantly lying and it seems they aren't really bothered. i have asked them if they have sent sumone to assess the damaged of his car (before he gets it repaired to back up lies) and they haven't and do not know when they are going to send sumone!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...