Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I was being supplied my ovo after unknowingly being swapped from SSE.  My issues began when we had a smart meter fitted and our bills almost doubled overnight - we at the time assumed we were just paying not enough until then and just continued to pay the excess bills each. Month.    I would from time to time contact ovo and get faced with a call centre on South Africa of the most rude agents who would just hang up after hours of wait and I could not even get an acknowledgement of an issue with my meter.  At one point we were not in the property for like 4 months and the bills were coming just as high!  It was at this point I was sure something is not right and ovo only care to send bailiffs and started threatening us with a pay as you go meter despite me taking out a 3.5k loan to pay of my outstanding balance.  Around 1600 each on both gas and electricity.  This is where its gets really bad -  the very same day they sent me out a new bill saying the money paid already was only to cover up until the November previous and because its now Feb we owe another 1k.   By that August this had risen to over 3k and I still couldn't get anyone to even acknowledge a fault let alone fix it.    In despair I tried to swap suppliers and to my surprise octopus accepted us because even tho the debt is owed we are trying deal with.  During our time with them the bill was coming only on my wife's name as I was responsible for other bills and she this one - now that we owe them 3k they have magically started adding my name as well as my wife's to the same debt to apply double pressure and its showing on my experiwn report now with a question mark and 2700 showing in grey -  This was my wife's debt which we dispute we owe yet the have now sent me letter with both our names on from oriel and past due credit debt agencies - is this illegal and how can I get them to take my. Name of this and leave on wife's name as its so unfair they give us a both a defualt for wife's debt which we dispute anyway.    In the end about 3 weeks ago I wrote an email to their ceo and rishi sunak and low and behold for the first time in our history with ovo someone who spoke English contacted us and said she will look into our claim.    I explained to her that we feel our meter is faulty and despite me contacting them using WhatsApp email and phone I still have not got anyone to acknowledge a fault even. And that I dispute I Owe anything as my son was in hospital for 3 months and we stayed with him so house was empty and still. They were sending us super sized bills more than when we started at home.  She promised to investigate and a few days later replied that she is sorry for the poor customer service and offered us £50 compensation - however she also. Mentioned that she's attached statements for us confirming the payment for 3k I made was only up until Nov and in Feb despite me pay 3.5k nearly it's correct for them to bill. Me. Another £900 the very same day and she did not agree our meter was faulty and therfore the debt stands and she will not be calling it bcak from past due credit.  During my time with my new supplier post ovo, octopus I requested tehy check my. Meters because I felt they were faulty and over charging me and I got excellent response asking me for further details which I supplied and I got a. Response bcak within days to say my meter was indeed faulty and octopus have now remotely repaired it.   I then contacted the energy ombudsman and explained my situation how she at ovo tried to fob me off and demand I apy money we don't feel we owe due to faulty equipment we reported but ovo had to process or mechanism to deal with it or lodge complaint even without having to cc their ceo and our pm. And now I feel sick to think both husband and wife will get a 6  year default for debt which have a validity of a questionable nature.    I explained all this to the energy ombudsman and they accepted my case and I explained to them that my new supplier found my fault which ovo refueed to accept - I've uploaded the email from new supplier to ombudsman showing we had a fault.    My. Question is is there anything I can upload in defence of my case to ombudsman before they decide outcome ina few weeks    All advice greatly appreciated not only would I like advice on how to clear this debt but also how I can pursue ovo for compensation and deterrence for the future.  Thansk 
    • Thanks for the reply dubai 50 - if the statute is 10 years it has long passed - if it is 15 years i havea few months left. i shall ignore until it gets serious  An update - - I sent the letter to the bank in Dubai ( I did get delivery confirmation from Royal Mail)   - I have moved to a new address ( this is the address i gave to the bank in dubai)  - IDR are continuing to send Letters to the old address, which leads me to believe they are not in contact with the bank at all. - i have not replied to any correspondence digital or hard as they are non threatening ( as of yet).        
    • Your topic title was altered last June 23 by the owner of this forum in the interests of the forum Anyway well done on your result and concluding your topic, title updated.   Andy   .
    • So what    Why ? Consent Order/ Confidentiality ? This would be be invaluable to followers of your topic.  
    • Even on their map on their website, these parking rules encompass the whole pleasure park - there is no dedicated area for permits and another for free parking as stated. royal leisure park praking area map.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insurance mis-sold refusing to accept claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5406 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I am currently on holiday and have had a major burst due to frozen pipes.

 

My mortgage advisor was Countrywide who informed me building insurance was compulsory to obtain a mortgage, they are deducting insurance from me under direct debit under CAIS COLL.

 

Oakwood Homeloans the lender has also increased my premiums by 28 pounds a month without my permission as they also state building insurance is compulsory.

 

Now I am in the position I need to make a claim, Countrywide are willing to cover me for contents yet Oakwood Homeloans are claiming they are only insuring me for redundancy.

 

I'm not trying to make 2 claims but I am now in a position of paying 2 insurance companies and none of them willing to provide the 'compulsory' building insurance they stated.

 

Certainly with the Oakwood scenario I could get a quote for building and redundancy cover for less than what they are charging me and they did add this on without my permission or knowledge.

 

Surely I have been mis-sold an inappropiate product, please can you advise.

 

 

Thanks

Edited by sutton6344
mistake
Link to post
Share on other sites

So have you got buildings insurance or not? I am not sure it is compulsory but most lenders would insist on it to protect "their" asset.

 

Is your question about making a building ins. claim or whether Oakwood Homeloans have mis-sold you a "redundancy" insurance package?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oakwood said they insisted on it to protect 'their' asset when they raised my premium by #28. This was done without my knowledge or permission.

 

It is only when I tried to make a claim they said I wasnt covered. They claim they have provided redundancy cover only.

 

If what they say is true they are charging me for insurance that is useless, I was under the impression the #28 was for building insurance.

Edited by sutton6344
addition
Link to post
Share on other sites

According to Norwich Union's website:

 

My home insurance policies are with my mortgage company. Can I switch?

Typically, you are free to switch to the company of your choice. Check your mortgage agreement to make sure you don't need to tell your lender before you take out a new policy. You may be able to save money by switching.

 

Request the original insurance proposal from both companies, check if you requested buildings insurance on either. If you did and they never added it then this may be a strong enough point to bring up in a complaint.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

I will requested a copy of the original insurance proposal from both companies by email with no response grom either, I will follow this up by requesting the same by registered post.

 

I have a letter from Oakwood dated 11th November 2008 that attempts to justify the increase in payments by £28 by quoting

 

“we require sight of a full insurance schedule in order to establish whether or not you have adequate building insurance in place.

 

It is our policy to ensure customers have adequate building insurance in place at all times, in order to protect our mutual interests in the event of a loss. We therefore undertook to write to all of our customers and request a copy of their current building’s insurance schedule, to ensure adequate cover is in place. I’m sure you will agree we are acting responsibly by ensuring our security is properly protected.”

 

 

 

Thanks everyone for your help

Edited by sutton6344
addition
Link to post
Share on other sites

my house has a defective/blocked gutter system and it has damged the Eaves soffit and due to water leakage on to the external brick wall, there are now damp patches in areas and rooms below where the blockages are in the form of damp patches. I know that the gutter may be delined for repair as explained under tear and wear but the blockages in the pipes is not due to tear and wear. The question is Am I entitled to claim for damage to the external wall, which would require some treatment under buildings content insurance?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

I recieved a phone call in February confirming I was actually insured, the stripping out was authorised and a surveyors report was issued.

 

Now that some of the reinstatement work has been completed, they are trying to claim I am not insured.

 

This is the day before the meeting to confirm that reinstatement has been completed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if repair work has commenced etc i assume Oakwood must have approved it as cover was in place. Request that call is listened too etc,also ask why they have they logged a claim if no cover and authorised? seem odd they should call you if no cover?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...