Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
My elderly parents - 78 and 79 have had a problem in getting to see their GP, when they make appointments they are told they can only see the practise nurse and all attempts at getting GP appointment have been refused by the surgery, I phoned the surgery this morning to complain about this and was told that if I complained they would take my parents of their list
I know they can take people of the surgery list without giving a reason, but I believe its due to age discrimination ( and therefore illegal) and I want to challenge them, I would like to have facts and figures with me when I go down to see them
No reason given my parents are happy to see a practise nurse for blood tests etc but want to see their GP about other things and I am sorry a PN may miss something that a GP will pick up on, I have also looked at the web site that advises GPs on removing a patient and they are not allowed to unless they give a warning ( unless there is violence ) and certainly cannot do so due to age or 'cost'
Any way ( and I am sorry if people dont agree with me) my parents have paid into the NHS are are bleddy entitled nto see a GP if they want
Well, after the treatment my parents received from my local hospital, I too believe that age discrimination is alive and kicking in the NHS, but like Bookworm says, you need to prove it.
Can you make the appointment on behalf of your mum or dad? If the appointment is refused ask why and to whom you are speaking so that you can challenge it in writing to head of practice.
Don't let your parents be threatened into not making a complaint.
One thing I've learned over the last few years is that there is definitely no such thing as an expert. Even if you think the GP will know more than the PN, they both don't know everything. You should never be embarrassed to return to the doctor several times and ask for a second opinion if you feel your 'problem' is not being dealt with effectively.
Maybe there is no such law at present, but if the GP is turning elderly patients away because of their age, it is discrimination. Why should they change their GP? It may be close by and convenient. Challenge what is unacceptable. If this is age discrimination, I would be making a formal complaint. Perhaps 'phone Age Concern to see whether they have any advice. The goal should be to make age discrimination as unacceptable to the public psyche as race and sex discrimination.
Maybe there is no such law at present, but if the GP is turning elderly patients away because of their age, it is discrimination. Why should they change their GP? It may be close by and convenient. Challenge what is unacceptable. If this is age discrimination, I would be making a formal complaint. Perhaps 'phone Age Concern to see whether they have any advice. The goal should be to make age discrimination as unacceptable to the public psyche as race and sex discrimination.
The point is though, that at present, it is not unacceptable. What do you feel will be gained from a formal complaint? Attitudes don't change because of letters, they change because of laws.
I phoned the surgery today to make an appointment for my dad, didnt say what it was for and was offered an appointment with the PN, I refused this and was told by the surgery - Mrxxxx always sees the PN. I said this time MRxxx will see the GP, The receptionist then asked to speak to my father as a 'matter of confidentialty' as she need to ask him what the problem was, I refused point blank and told her we would not be discussing my dads problem with her only with the GP and if she didnt make an appointment we would be taking up the matter with the the local health authority and we also go straight to the surgery and demand to see a GP Dad has an appointment with GP on Monday, he has trouble with his sight and his optician has told him to see his GP as it may be that wet eye problem that was in the papers recently, but I want him checked out and referred to an eye specialist if need be.
Seftonview
Age discrimination is accepted because of the following
1. Old people dont contest things as they are bought up not to make a fuss and to treat doctors and the like as 'authority figures.'
2 Young people dont give a damn as they cant percieve themselves as ever getting old so it does not concern them
3. It is people like me in middleage who tend to make a stand as we know we will be in the same situation in 10 - 20 years
Good for you madamfluff. As the optician is unsure of the eye disorder, he rightly referred your dad to his GP. Your GP can refer him to a specialist. It sounds rather like the PN is filtering the GPs appointments. I'm sure there are a great many problems that they can deal with, but ultimately it should be an absolute right for the patient to make the appointment with the GP. I wish your dad well.
Seftonview, silence gives consent. There is, I believe an Equality Bill in process. My attitude towards descrimination is already formed, I do not need a law to know right from wrong.
What Seftonview is trying to say, I think, is that you said in your first post:
but I believe its due to age discrimination ( and therefore illegal)
and he is pointing out that in law at this point, there is no such thing as age discrimination outside of work. So no, the alleged discrimination of which you complain is not illegal.
Therefore, any complaint of age discrimination to the surgery would fail in law.
Apologies to people who I was in the process of helping, I may be gone some time.
go for it, and complain to your MP, or anyone who will listen. GP's get paid a fortune, and pick and choose who they will see. It is wrong to do this, and I have had problems with my GP when my mum was alive and she was unwell, but would not complain or say anything.
It takes us, their next of kin to take up the mantle and fight for fair treatment for everyone, no matter who you are.
It really makes me mad to hear about this behaviour
Good luck in your fight
What Seftonview is trying to say, I think, is that you said in your first post:
and he is pointing out that in law at this point, there is no such thing as age discrimination outside of work. So no, the alleged discrimination of which you complain is not illegal.
Therefore, any complaint of age discrimination to the surgery would fail in law.
This is exactly the point I was making.
If the GPs "issue", for want of a better word, is with the patients age, as it stands he has done nothing wrong in law. I'm not advocating that is right or fair, but it is the way it is at present.
Originally Posted by Sali
Seftonview, silence gives consent. There is, I believe an Equality Bill in process. My attitude towards descrimination is already formed, I do not need a law to know right from wrong.
I agree with you, I'm not advocating that discrimination is ever just, but in law there has been none. Challenging with the GP won't sway his opinion... it's difficult enough to force change where the law is on your side (and I speak as someone who is a minority group in four respects - disability, race, religion and sexual orientation); let alone when it is not.
Originally Posted by Madamfluff
Seftonview
Age discrimination is accepted because of the following
1. Old people dont contest things as they are bought up not to make a fuss and to treat doctors and the like as 'authority figures.'
2 Young people dont give a damn as they cant percieve themselves as ever getting old so it does not concern them
3. It is people like me in middleage who tend to make a stand as we know we will be in the same situation in 10 - 20 years
These are quite sweeping statements to make, and they aren't really accurate. I am a young person, and I do give a damn. I have a real appreciation of the difficulties various parts of society can face (see above), and I do work in my community as a volunteer to try and challenge and improve this. What I am advocating is that, as Uncle Remus would say, "we need to think with our heads rather than our feets."
Hang on a minute Seftonview. You earlier suggested that it may be an idea to change GPs. That sounds more like thinking with your feet than your head. You may think it not worthwhile to complain as it will not sway the GP, but challenging opinions and attitudes is a good thing. It makes us think and question ourselves...and just sometimes things may change for the better.
Hang on a minute Seftonview. You earlier suggested that it may be an idea to change GPs. That sounds more like thinking with your feet than your head. You may think it not worthwhile to complain as it will not sway the GP, but challenging opinions and attitudes is a good thing. It makes us think and question ourselves...and just sometimes things may change for the better.
Ironically, moving on is thinking with your head in this case.
You can't force the GP not to discriminate in this instance, since he isn't breaking the law.
You can however, go to a GP with a better attitude and outlook.
Ahh, couldn't get to your Uncle Remus link to read the quote.
So, you move on to another GP and find he has the same outlook and attitude as the one you just left but now it takes two bus rides to get there. People aren't allowed to interview the head of practice before registering with a surgery; you just go to the nearest or most convenient. Madamfluff was told that if she complained her parents would be taken off the list. No way is that acceptable. If such a decision is not challenged, the GP practice will go on to treat others the same way - perhaps next time it will be your relative.
However, any challenge can only be successful if done the right way. Go in alleging age discrimination: no basis in law, challenge will fail. On the other hand, complain about the blackmail attempt (if you make a fuss, we'll kick you out) which can be acted upon, you are far more likely to get a result.
The danger is to let emotions cloud reason, MadamFluff wanted "facts and figures" to deal with them, this is what both Sefton and myself are doing.
If you read a few more of Sefton's posts, you will see that where there is a way to complain about discrimination, he will find it and help. So don't waste your anger on the wrong target. ;-)
Apologies to people who I was in the process of helping, I may be gone some time.
Hi Thank you all for your comments and I accept the facts that I wont be able to get redress from law, how ever I have found this and will be printing it out and taking it with me on Monday when I go with my dad
Let us know how you get on. Remember, cold facts will get you listened to better than anger, so try to stay calm and collected (easier said than done, I know!).
Good luck. Your parents are lucky to have you to fight their corner.
Apologies to people who I was in the process of helping, I may be gone some time.
Bookworm, I'm not angry and at no time have I suggested any legal challenge - but I'd disagreed with Seftonview who suggested they might look for another GP and not bother with a formal complaint. I haven't suggested that madamfluff go in all guns blazing, but that she ask why her parents have been denied access to the GP and challenge it with head of practice if necessary.