Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
After hours of reading threads here, I wrote to Abbey asking for my transactions for the last six years on 11th July. I got the microfiche argument letter from Pam Speed dated 17th July - quick but not helpful.
Tomorrow I will send her a letter with the microfiche argument counter-argument.
My charges since September 2005 are over £600 so I dread to think how much the money-grabbing sods have had in the last 6 years.
Good luck! I've just spent ages reading through the threads and Abbey seem like a right nightmare. I've got my Data Protection Act letter ready to go out tomorrow and without doubt I'll get the standard one back from Pam Speed just like you.
I'll keep reading your thread to see how you get on. Hopefully if enough people get onto them, they'll stop the delaying tactics they seem to use on everyone! Makes me so cross to think about all the money they've got from us in the past 7 years or so .
. I got the microfiche argument letter from Pam Speed dated 17th July - quick but not helpful.
Give her a break - she's getting to know about Consumer Action Group! - must be getting on for 7-8000 out of the 40,000 writing to her alone since January
Good point - Poor Pam, she's probably drowning in letters sent by people who have found this site!
On Monday I sent a letter to Ms Speed pointing out her error about the DPA not covering microfiche. In fact I pointed out that it even covers x-rays.
Today I received 14 bank statements. To be honest, at first I was worried that it was letters informing me of more charges so I was relieved to find that they were statements.
Abbey now have until August 20th to send me the microfiche records.
hi kirstypops
im just getting to know pam as well. im just ahead of you in that ive sent my letter in response to the microfiche bluff on monday this week. i will keep an eye out for you and let you know how im doing as well. i just recieved the standard 14 months of statements, so im just waitng to see what happens
best of luck mate
steve
11th july. sent letter to abbey for list of charges on both accounts
17th and 18th july letters for both accounts regards the microfiche bluff.
28th july sent requested for repayment of charges.(bit late)
Amazingly, I got my microfiche records today. The deadline wasn't until 20th August so I really didn't expect to see them any time soon. I wrote to Pam Speed on Monday and within the week I got the records!
Over the last 6 yearsAbbey have taken 147 charges off of me with a grand total of £3,250.50. :o
hi kirstypops
i had some stuff off Abbey as well, but i dont think they are my microfiche records as they only go back 12 months or so. will have to be a bit more patient. maybe pammy was going on the ladies first thing? strangely my 40 day date is 20th august as well.
ah well, best of luck mate
steve
11th july. sent letter to abbey for list of charges on both accounts
17th and 18th july letters for both accounts regards the microfiche bluff.
28th july sent requested for repayment of charges.(bit late)
I hope you get your information soon Steve. I actually got some more today - movements enquiries for the few days in between the dates of my microfiche records and statements. There was yet another charge in there.
On checking my account today to see if my rent had been paid, I found it hadn't but they have taken out a whole bunch of charges. I called and was told that they didn't pay the rent because there wasn't quite enough to cover it, although they should know that there will be more money going in my account on Monday. Instead they aren't paying it and will charge me more than it would have cost to pay it and charge me for that. But they never consider what's in my account when they take their charges. Even on a Saturday.
This new information brings my total up to £3,554.50. According to the spreadsheet, the interest is £779.63.
My next letter politely asking for my money back will go on Monday.
Seems to be going swimmingly for you, I have got a bunch of statements from Shabby to go through tonight but only seems to be about 2 years worth. I hope to be surprised when I open them up.
I got a letter from Marc Winder, Head of Complaints today. He's sorry that I'm unhappy. Isn't that sweet? They're going to do a thorough investigation and will let me know what is going on in four weeks time.
Silly Marc obviously didn't notice that I made a request, not a complaint. I'll drop him a line next week and remind him that Abbey have two weeks left to pay up.
It's such nonsense that we have to go through this whole dance.
Data Protection Act letter sent 11th July 2006
Microfiche argument received 17th July 3006
Response sent 24th July 2006
14 months statements received 26th July 2006
Microfiche data received 28th and 29th July 2006
Prelim letter sent 1st August 2006
Sorry you're not happy letter received 11th August 2006
£175 refund unexpectedly appeared in bank account 16th August 2006
LBA sent 16th August 2006
Claim served 5th October 2006 - Abbey acknowledged 16th October and defence filed.
I had an interesting conversation last night with someone who works for Barclays Investment Banking. She admitted to not knowing much about personal banking but bravely tried to defend bank charges. I told her what I was doing and she said 'oh but I know when a cheque is bounced in investment banking it costs a lot to sort out but it may be different in personal banking'. I said that there is an issue about being charged £35 by an organisation who can't or won't prove that that is what it actually costs them. She said they might not know how much it costs. In that case how could they come up with the figures they charge? And what kind of organisation, especially a financial one, can't put some approximate cost to it? I also pointed out that what I was charged £11 for 6 years ago I am now charged £35 pounds. She suggested inflation but didn't even convince herself with that!
In the end she thought that the banks pay people off because going to court would be bad publicity and that it's cheaper than hiring solicitors. I suggested that all they would have to do is explain the charges and how it actually costs £35 when a direct debit is unpaid and it could stop people claiming their money back. Plus, of course, Abbey never pay up before getting the solicitors involved.
She did automatically assume that it was always the fault of the customer and that they should have to pay for writing bad cheques. I explained that often people start with one incident of one or two unpaid direct debits for whatever reason which snowballs with these silly charges being taken out when the customer has no money in their account, incurring even more charges. She still kept talking about people writing bad cheques though. Of course I should mention that we had been drinking and our attention skills were not at their best.
It was interesting that someone in banking - albeit a different branch of banking - couldn't answer any of my questions or justify the banks' behaviour.
Data Protection Act letter sent 11th July 2006
Microfiche argument received 17th July 3006
Response sent 24th July 2006
14 months statements received 26th July 2006
Microfiche data received 28th and 29th July 2006
Prelim letter sent 1st August 2006
Sorry you're not happy letter received 11th August 2006
£175 refund unexpectedly appeared in bank account 16th August 2006
LBA sent 16th August 2006
Claim served 5th October 2006 - Abbey acknowledged 16th October and defence filed.
Today is the deadline from my prelim letter so before I sent out the lba I thought I should triple check my figures. I've never exactly been a maths whizz! I had in fact missed two charges and two more had been added recently. I went onto online banking to double check the most recent ones and lo and behold, 6 payments have gone into my account - all titled Miscellaneous Fee Refund. They come to a grand total of £175. My revised claim is for £3,649.50.
I will now have to rewrite my LBA to acknowledge these refunds but if they think that I'll be happy with £175 instead of £3,649.50 they are even bigger fools that I thought. That said, it's come at a good time - I really needed some cash today.
Data Protection Act letter sent 11th July 2006
Microfiche argument received 17th July 3006
Response sent 24th July 2006
14 months statements received 26th July 2006
Microfiche data received 28th and 29th July 2006
Prelim letter sent 1st August 2006
Sorry you're not happy letter received 11th August 2006
£175 refund unexpectedly appeared in bank account 16th August 2006
LBA sent 16th August 2006
Claim served 5th October 2006 - Abbey acknowledged 16th October and defence filed.
I applied for a new account at Natwest and was offered a very basic one - First Reserve. I couldn't get a current account because of my credit. The girl on the phone said that the First Reserve wouldn't be a problem. I sent off the ID they asked for (a bank statement) and then received a letter saying that following a credit check they can't give me the account. Like other people, I wonder if this is because I have started a claim against a bank.
Anyway, my query is, has anyone been threatening with closure of their account and successful argued against it? If Abbey close my account I will be absolutely screwed as I can't seem to get an account anywhere else but I'll be damned if they're going to scare my off.
Data Protection Act letter sent 11th July 2006
Microfiche argument received 17th July 3006
Response sent 24th July 2006
14 months statements received 26th July 2006
Microfiche data received 28th and 29th July 2006
Prelim letter sent 1st August 2006
Sorry you're not happy letter received 11th August 2006
£175 refund unexpectedly appeared in bank account 16th August 2006
LBA sent 16th August 2006
Claim served 5th October 2006 - Abbey acknowledged 16th October and defence filed.
I had a similar experience with Natwest. When I applied over the telephone for a NAtwest STEP account, the guy told me that I could have a current account if I wanted one. I was very surprised to hear this, as my credit rating is shot to bits.
So when the paperwork came through I sent it off - only to be rejected after the credit check. I don't think it has anything to do with your action against Abbey.
However I did, in the end manage to open a step account, with this one they don't run a check, you get online banking, a debit card and all the basic banking facilities. You can apply online.
Also you could try Nationwide or Co-op, other people have opened basic aoounts with these banks
Good luck.
Abbey Prelim Letter sent 16/06/06 - LBA sent 30/06/06 - MCOL served 22/07/06 - Acknowledged 26/07/06 - Defended 16/08/2006 - Settled 20/09/06 :o Abbey 2 Prelim Letter sent 22/09/06 Abbey 2 LBA sent 9/10/06 MCOL 03/11/06 Cap One Prelim sent 28/06/06 - LBA sent 13/07/06 MCOL served 05/08/06 - Acknowledged 02/08/06 - Served 05/08/2006 -Settled in full 22/08/06 Halifax Prelim sent 03/07/06 - LBA sent 17/07/06 MCOL issued 03/08/06 - settled in full 09/08/06 MBNA S.A.R sent 21/08/06 Settled 21/09/06 Morgan Stanley S.A.R sent 29/09/06
I was just suspicious as I was turned down for the Step account over the phone because of my credit and then told that I could have a First Reserve even with bad credit. Then they changed their mind. I've already been turned down by Halifax and Coop too. Of course the more banks turn me down the worse my credit report gets so I'm probably stuffed by now!
Data Protection Act letter sent 11th July 2006
Microfiche argument received 17th July 3006
Response sent 24th July 2006
14 months statements received 26th July 2006
Microfiche data received 28th and 29th July 2006
Prelim letter sent 1st August 2006
Sorry you're not happy letter received 11th August 2006
£175 refund unexpectedly appeared in bank account 16th August 2006
LBA sent 16th August 2006
Claim served 5th October 2006 - Abbey acknowledged 16th October and defence filed.
I did read somewhere that the STEP account was becoming Natwest's most 'popular' account. Maybe they've realised why and have started running credit checks.
All I can say is although I've had the standard "we may close your account" letter, they haven't done so yet, and I'm now nearing the final stages of my claim.
Fingers crossed.
Abbey Prelim Letter sent 16/06/06 - LBA sent 30/06/06 - MCOL served 22/07/06 - Acknowledged 26/07/06 - Defended 16/08/2006 - Settled 20/09/06 :o Abbey 2 Prelim Letter sent 22/09/06 Abbey 2 LBA sent 9/10/06 MCOL 03/11/06 Cap One Prelim sent 28/06/06 - LBA sent 13/07/06 MCOL served 05/08/06 - Acknowledged 02/08/06 - Served 05/08/2006 -Settled in full 22/08/06 Halifax Prelim sent 03/07/06 - LBA sent 17/07/06 MCOL issued 03/08/06 - settled in full 09/08/06 MBNA S.A.R sent 21/08/06 Settled 21/09/06 Morgan Stanley S.A.R sent 29/09/06
Abbey Prelim Letter sent 16/06/06 - LBA sent 30/06/06 - MCOL served 22/07/06 - Acknowledged 26/07/06 - Defended 16/08/2006 - Settled 20/09/06 :o Abbey 2 Prelim Letter sent 22/09/06 Abbey 2 LBA sent 9/10/06 MCOL 03/11/06 Cap One Prelim sent 28/06/06 - LBA sent 13/07/06 MCOL served 05/08/06 - Acknowledged 02/08/06 - Served 05/08/2006 -Settled in full 22/08/06 Halifax Prelim sent 03/07/06 - LBA sent 17/07/06 MCOL issued 03/08/06 - settled in full 09/08/06 MBNA S.A.R sent 21/08/06 Settled 21/09/06 Morgan Stanley S.A.R sent 29/09/06
Data Protection Act letter sent 11th July 2006
Microfiche argument received 17th July 3006
Response sent 24th July 2006
14 months statements received 26th July 2006
Microfiche data received 28th and 29th July 2006
Prelim letter sent 1st August 2006
Sorry you're not happy letter received 11th August 2006
£175 refund unexpectedly appeared in bank account 16th August 2006
LBA sent 16th August 2006
Claim served 5th October 2006 - Abbey acknowledged 16th October and defence filed.
Well I finally managed to scrape together the money to start my claim and that was done on October 5th. Abbey are defending the claim and I'll get the aq shortly. It all feels a bit scary now but I've got nothing to lose I suppose.
Data Protection Act letter sent 11th July 2006
Microfiche argument received 17th July 3006
Response sent 24th July 2006
14 months statements received 26th July 2006
Microfiche data received 28th and 29th July 2006
Prelim letter sent 1st August 2006
Sorry you're not happy letter received 11th August 2006
£175 refund unexpectedly appeared in bank account 16th August 2006
LBA sent 16th August 2006
Claim served 5th October 2006 - Abbey acknowledged 16th October and defence filed.