Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • How much of the documentation have you seen from when probate was obtained? And do you have a copy of the original will? I can't remember. My thought about you making the decision on your own to go with another lawyer is that three of you are meant to be beneficiaries of this will trust, aren't you? Normally you would need to act together. HB
    • Octopus allows you to pay by variable Direct Debit, so you pay only for what you use but still benefit from DD pricing. That's what I've done ever we were SOLRed over to them in July 2022.
    • Hi guys, I am about to file my defence via email as cannot log in to the claim anymore.  Can you please advise if I can paste below and if it's good to go for now, or should I add anything else in?  Thanks!  The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4.  The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made.  1.  The Defendant is the recorded keeper of vehicle xxxx xxx.  2.  It is denied that the Defendant entered into a contract with the Claimant - Parking Eye LTD.  3.  As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance.  The Claimant was simply contracted by the landowner to provide car-park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner.  Accordingly, it is denied that the Claimant has authority to bring this claim.   4.  In any case it is denied that the Defendant broke the terms of a contract with the Claimant.  5.  The Claimant is attempting double recovery by adding an additional sum not included in the original offer.   6.  The Particulars of Claim is denied in its entirety.  It is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief at all.
    • Getting onto the ladder: The first-time buyer conundrumView the full article
    • Ooops - one to many also s..... my draft reply should read as:  Thank you for your response Mr Schnur  I set out my position quite clearly in my letter of claim and nothing has changed. Your insurance requirement is unlawful and is contrary to section 57 of the Consumer Rights Act, and also section 72 of the same statute. I would also refer you to the outcomes in PENCHEV v P2G (225MC852) and SMIRNOVS v P2G (27MC729).  My deadline for action - 1 May 2024 - still stands, and if P2G wish to avoid the addition of court costs and interest to my claim, you may wish to respond positively before that date.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Nationwide debt -NCCS/KRP now MKDP - **ACK'd Now SB'd**


cleo4patra
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2066 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Had a very strange letter today from a debt collection agency for NCCS .

 

 

I had CCA'd Nationwide and had no response

- I sent non compliance letter ( cannnot demand payment , pass on to DCA etc).

 

 

What I don't understand is that the DCA have written (without prejudice) offering me a disounted settlement with no detriment on my credit file

- limited offer for seven days only)

 

I am puzzled - any ideas??? thanks Cleo

Link to post
Share on other sites

Am unsure what to do next - may write and ask exactly what they are offering?

Think Nationwide ad, think juicy worm, think reeling you in!! :eek:

Don't take the bait. I'd send them this Dear John letter

Ref No: xxxx

 

 

Dear Sir,

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx, the contents of which have been noted.

 

However your client, Nationwide have singularly failed to respond to my letters dated xx/xx/xx and xx/xx/xx whiich required them to supply a true copy of a properly executed Consumer Credit agreement.

 

I am familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my liability for the debt in question.

 

I await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a very good letter - thank you. Do they ever settle ?

well on further investigation K P R debt collector is actually Nationwide. To look at the letter you would never believe it. At very bottom in tiny print "K P R is business name of Nationwide Building Society"????? It is quite deceiving.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Think Nationwide ad, think juicy worm, think reeling you in!! :eek:

Don't take the bait. I'd send them this Dear John letter

Sent said letter Ie no CCA etc - but KPR have now sent final demand!! The account is still indispute so is there a further letter to send please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am unsure of next step?? Can anyone help please??

 

I would just write back thanking them for their harassment letter which you will retain within your harassment file.

 

Place account in dispute in big bold letters at the start of the letter.

 

Refer them to your previous letter and remind them of their obligations under the oft debt collection guidance and enclose a copy of your previous letter for their reference.

 

Report them to the enforcement authorites;)

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would just write back thanking them for their harassment letter which you will retain within your harassment file.

 

Place account in dispute in big bold letters at the start of the letter.

 

Refer them to your previous letter and remind them of their obligations under the oft debt collection guidance and enclose a copy of your previous letter for their reference.

 

Report them to the enforcement authorites;)

strangely enough I sent that letter today after having a good trawl on this site!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

i have received a demand from wescot for an NCCS credit card that has already been to several DCA's. Have been through all of the procedures - collected a supposed "Agreement" from the branch. This consists of a copy of a "Priority Application" with absolutely NO prescribed terms whatsoever. NCCS and all the previous DCA's KNOW this. Wescot insist I have to pay in full. All the form consists of is:

name and address, password, PIN issue,

Job title,

Card Protection plan and my signature, no payment terms , credit limit no APR or interest rates. Help!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remind them that they are breaching OFT guidelines and request they return it to previous DCA.

Next time they threaten demand a copy of their complaints procedure, telling them why you are making a formal complaint.

This action can have them running.

I have no legal training, any knowledge I have has come from this forum, and my own experiences. Always balance up any advice you get with your own common sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remind them that they are breaching OFT guidelines and request they return it to previous DCA.

Next time they threaten demand a copy of their complaints procedure, telling them why you are making a formal complaint.

This action can have them running.

thanks - I have been through all of the ususal stuff - however I have now referred them to the latest judgment Southern Pacific Securities v Walker and referred to the paragraph - missing prescribed terms = wholly unenforceable. Lets what happens now.

 

many thanks

 

Cleo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 years later...

well - it's been ages since I posted on this thread

- been having letters for ages from MKDP

 

 

">>>>we are trying to find a copy of your agreement....."

(I picked a copy up from the Nationwide branch years ago and it was application form no prescribed terms.

 

 

Now I have received a letter from them today"..

 

 

.we are concerned that correspondence addressed to you has been returned from your address.

 

 

In response to the returned mail received,

we have undertaken further investigation using Credit Reference Agencies in addition to other reliable databases

and this information has led us to understand you still reside at the same address

... please contact us to discuss further..."

 

NOW I AM NOT PLEASED!!!!!

 

 

I have not sent any mail back and I think the letter implies I am being deceitful/underhand.

 

 

I believe this debt is not just unenforceable but also SB now.

 

 

Anyone else had such a communication????

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Had a letter today from MKDP - for ages and ages they have sent me letters "still trying to deal with your complaint...."

 

 

after they received my Statute Barred letter

miraculously they have found a copy of the "agreement"

 

 

which is copy of application form same as I collected from the branch years ago (see posts on this thres)

they also enclose a copy of a letter I sent to Raven Revoceries in June 2012 -

this letter explains I only ever received app form copy/quotes cases/ unenforceable etc (think its a template letter).

 

 

They say this letter counts as acknowledging the account.

 

 

Anyone help please?

 

 

have had response from MKDP to my letter . I explained had sent no mail back and also that this was now SB under Limitation Act. MKDP have "noted my dispute.......and are contacting Nationwide...... all collection activity now on hold......."
Link to post
Share on other sites

why did you start up letter tennis again after 4yrs...

 

 

thats exactly what they want you to do .

 

 

what does your credit file say?

 

 

oh and ignore them

 

 

the RR letter [which is them] does not ack the debt

 

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I need to go through the paperwork again

- I think I had nothing from anyone for ages which may explain the gap.

 

 

I thought if it went to court it was perceived as not good practice to not reply.

I didn't realise they were the same organisation either.

 

 

They say this their final decision and I am liable for the debt.

 

 

I know that I haven't paid for over six years .......thanks for your input

 

 

why did you start up letter tennis again after 4yrs...

 

 

thats exactly what they want you to do .

 

 

what does your credit file say?

 

 

oh and ignore them

 

 

the RR letter [which is them] does not ack the debt

 

 

 

dx

Link to post
Share on other sites

once a CCA request fails

 

 

its always best to stop all letter tennis.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

Letter from MKDP (I sent them the Statute barred letter a while ago) apologising..

 

 

. "I can verigy this account is now closed and you will be no longer pursued for the debt..."

 

 

Apologise for distress and inconvenience and enclose a cheque for £50!!!.

 

 

I understand MKDP are now "Hoist"?

 

Anyway it was nice to get the cheque

 

 

however my name is incorrect on the cheque so they are sending a replacement ...

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

well : I tried to claim PPI for this in 2016 but was deemed not mis -sold. I had forgotten I claimed to be honest and recently went through some paperwork and sent them another claim. Received letter saying had previously tried with copy of rejection letter. Further letter saying undisclosed commission : greater than the 50% threshold and a cheque on the way For £700.00 + !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

another plevin win then...

 

 

well done

 

don't forget to donate if you can to keep us here.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...