Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • They have defended the claim by saying that the job was of unsatisfactory standard and they had to call another carpenter to remedy. My husband has text messages about them losing the keys a second time and also an email. What do they hope to achieve??? Most importantly,  as far as I have seen online, now I need to wait for paperwork from the court, correct?
    • The Notice to Hirer does not comply with the protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule  4 . This is before I ask if Europarks have sent you a copy of the PCN they sent to Arval along with a copy of the hire agreement et. if they haven't done that either you are totally in the clear and have nothing to worry about and nothing to pay. The PCN they have sent you is supposed to be paid by you according to the Act within 21 days. The chucklebuts have stated 28 days which is the time that motorists have to pay. Such a basic and simple thing . The Act came out in 2012 and still they cannot get it right which is very good news for you. Sadly there is no point in telling them- they won't accept it because they lose their chance to make any money out of you. they are hoping that by writing to you demanding money plus sending in their  unregulated debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors that you might be so frightened as to pay them money so that you can sleep at night. Don't be surprised if some of their letters are done in coloured crayons-that's the sort of  level of people you will be dealing with. Makes great bedding for the rabbits though. Euro tend not to be that litigious but while you can safely ignore the debt collectors just keep an eye out for a possible Letter of Claim. They are pretty rare but musn't be ignored. Let us know so that you can send a suitably snotty letter to them showing that you are not afraid of them and are happy to go to Court as you like winning.  
    • They did reply to my defence stating it would fail and enclosed copies of NOA, DN Term letter and account statements. All copies of T&C's that could be reconstructions and the IP address on there resolves to the town where MBNA offices are, not my location
    • Here are 7 of our top tips to help you connect with young people who have left school or otherwise disengaged.View the full article
    • My defence was standard no paperwork:   1.The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. Paragraph 1 is noted. The Defendant has had a contractual relationship with MBNA Limited in the past. The Defendant does not recognise the reference number provided by the claimant within its particulars and has sought verification from the claimant who is yet to comply with requests for further information. 3. Paragraph 2 is denied. The Defendant maintains that a default notice was never received. The Claimant is put to strict proof to that a default notice was issued by MBNA Limited and received by the Defendant. 4. Paragraph 3 is denied. The Defendant is unaware of any legal assignment or Notice of Assignment allegedly served from either the Claimant or MBNA Limited. 5. On the xx/xx/2023 the Defendant requested information pertaining to this claim by way of a CCA 1974 Section 78 request. The claimant is yet to respond to this request. On the xx/xx/2023 a CPR 31.14 request was sent to Kearns who is yet to respond. To date, xx/xx/2023, no documentation has been received. The claimant remains in default of my section 78 request. 6. It is therefore denied with regards to the Defendant owing any monies to the Claimant, the Claimant has failed to provide any evidence of proof of assignment being sent/ agreement/ balance/ breach or termination requested by CPR 31.14, therefore the Claimant is put to strict proof to: (a) show how the Defendant entered into an agreement; and (b) show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a default notice pursuant to Section 87(1) CCA1974 (c) show how the claimant has reached the amount claimed for; and (d) show how the Claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity to issue a claim; 7. As per Civil Procedure Rule 16.5(4), it is expected that the Claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 8. On the alternative, as the Claimant is an assignee of a debt, it is denied that the Claimant has the right to lay a claim due to contraventions of Section 136 of the Law of Property Act and Section 82A of the consumer credit Act 1974. 9. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the Claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Does a liability order (Council Tax) have to be declared on job application?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5605 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Dear all,

 

I am new to this forum and have been reading with interest the Council Tax forums.

 

I was not sure whether to start a new one and apologise if I should have just replied to an older one, but mine was a slightly different question to 'appealing an order' or 'attending a hearing' so many apologies.

 

(I also posted on consumer forum by accident when it should have been this forum, so apologies there too!)

 

I was living in my house in Manchester but had to move due to a job and was then renting in London and paying council tax (unocupied) in Manchester. I was then made redundant and told MCouncil that I had moved back (but did not realise that it was actually a separate department). They sent letters to my old rented address in London and the LLady did not forward them to me. They obtained a court order and the only time I realised when for some reason they suddenly started writing to my house in Manchester.

 

So, I already have a Court order i.e. liability order against me.

 

I am still unemployed, but am applying for jobs. I have applied fro back date of council tax benefit in the meanwhile, but am unsure as to whether they will pay and in any event know that it would not be for the full amount.

 

On my job applications, they often ask if I have any criminal convictions or court orders.

 

I know that non payment of CT is like a driving conviction and is not deemed a criminal conviction. I also know that it does not affect credit rating and not a judgment in County Court.

 

1) However, the job application states that the person applying must be of 'good character', so just wondering whether they have any other general checks that would find the court order against me?

 

2) I know that a liability order stays on until it is paid in full - however, if it is paid in full - is that it? i.e. no more ways to check that a court order is against me?

 

3) I was thinking of appealing and whether it would be worth it since I did try to contact the council to state that I had moved back (albeit it seems not the council tax department since they have so many departments - although my message was acknowledged.

 

Many thanks for help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have replied to your other post and moved as you will no doubt have seen.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin3030 & ss002d6252, Many thanks to you both for your kind help.

 

I have been searching the internet and was on one other forum yesterday(but the other forum despite being a legal forum was not as helpful or as nice).

 

Both of you supplied help and advice which I would not have thought of and has not been supplied by other experts (in the other forum). They simply stated that it was not a criminal conviction (which I already knew).

 

The disclosure advice was helpful by Martin3030 and I googled it as advised, and found it helful. I also googled 'good character check' which was also useful - checks police record and HMRC.

 

A friend who works in police as a secretary had to wait for 3 months after being offered job due to checks so it made me nervous as to what to declare.

 

I also emailed the HR department asking advice about their application form (under an assumed name) and they were not specific but told me to declare it 'just in case', which also made me nervous.

 

ss002d6252 was very specific in his advice and I did not think of the attachment of earnings. The recovery department has done something similar because I am on benefits and have had an attachment to JSA, but after phoning them today, they say that I have now paid it off in full, so I assume that will no longer be traced either?

 

A slightly different problem - I have tried to hype up my job application by saying that I am 'freelance' to cover the unemployment status and lack of current referee but now realise about the possible HMRC check to see if I am paying income tax - need I worry about that? I have done odds bits of freelance whilst claiming - but it has only been for about £30 - £45 extra per month and only the last 2 months.

 

The deadline for the application was today and I have sent it in and not declared the LO - even the recovery department stated not to bother.

 

Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Many thanks ss002d6252.

 

I am no longer worried about the LO - many thanks! But you have helped a lot.

 

I am concerned though about the checks that they do with HMRC to see whether I am paying income tax. It has now been confirmed that they do that.

 

I am unemployed but did not want to put that down on the form, so said that I was a freelancer in my field, which to some extent is fine but later stated that I was self employed. I have only had about 3 freelance jobs over the last 3 months and each of them were about £30-£45 each so hardly earning a wage.

 

But, I am worried that I will look like I am self employed and not paying income tax because I hyped up the application form.

 

What would your advice be, please?

 

Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found this on Website of the UK government : Directgov, which I have pasted below in case it is handy for anyone else, although a little unsure about the 'good character checks' and whether they assume that I am earning more than £6,035 which I am most definitely not, and just looking to find a job, and make my CV look better.

How much can you earn without paying tax and National Insurance?

 

 

Income Tax

 

Everyone can earn a certain amount each year without paying any Income Tax. This is called your Personal Allowance. In 2008-2009 the Personal Allowance is £6,035. Some people can earn a bit more before they start paying tax, if they're over 65, for example.

 

National Insurance

 

You can earn up to £105 a week (2008-2009) before you pay any National Insurance contributions. This is known as the 'primary threshold'.

As long as you earn more than £90 a week (2008-2009) you can still build up your entitlement to a State Pension and certain other benefits. This is known as the 'lower earnings limit'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...