Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax paid online but bailiffs want money


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

Can someone help me! I have paid all my council tax off online 2wks ago and my local council have confirmed it. I have received a hand delivered letter today from a bailiff (Rundle & Co) asking for £180 pounds by this Friday or they will take action against me I.e Bankruptcy,charging order or prison. All the bailiffs have done is delivered 2 letters and one of them being this final demand. Do i have to pay this as i have no dealing with them at all.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi i did this recently and i just rang my council office and asked them to let the bailiffs know they had the money. The council will then forward the money onto them. My council tax is now with the bailiffs who really want me to pay them direct but i dont i just keep paying it online at the end of the day they cant take any action if you have proof that you have paid money into your council tax account.

Did you actually physically take the letter or was it pushed through the door, i would just play silly and keep paying online. Do make sure you print off your bank statement or ask the council to send you a receipt to make sure you are covered.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you have already paid the council tax of fthere is no debt for them to chase. You should write to the council tax revenues office asking them to call off the bailiffs as you have paid and they have confiemd this. i would also write to the bailiffs disputing thi sdebt and there right to collect and advis ethem to rfer to their client

 

even when debts are passed to DC, you can stillpay the council directly. they will tell you that once you have passed it over they prefer you to pay the DC but they cannot stop you frompayingthem directly

 

is the £180 what was owed or are they hiking charges on. They will try to inflate charges, but bylaw theer are only crtain things and amounts they can claim for.

Link to post
Share on other sites

kfdh1962 : Council tax has been paid of in two payments first for £650 and the second for £129 direct to the council the last one being two weeks ago and the £180 are bailiffs charges. can they still charge me for the hand delivered letter today? as my council tax was paid up two weeks ago?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

as the debt was paid off before they called i would contest the charges as clealry the council should have advised them that the arrears had been cleared.

are they charging £180 for 2 letters?. there are pre-determined amounts they are allowed to charge for visits to hand deliver letters, its around £24 for the first and a lower figure for the second , ill go check it out for you

Link to post
Share on other sites

£20 pound for the first visit and £15 fo the second, take a lokk here, some useful advice

 

Debt Basics - Bailiff Guide - know your rights

 

i would write to them advising that the debt is fully paid and when. ask them to break down their charges with details of what activiites they are charging you for and when these occured. the dispute the amounts and the right o colectthem if the debt was paid before you were contacted

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks kfdh1962,

 

I have just spoke to the council and told them i was not happy with these charges and the only contact i have had with the bailiffs are these two letters so why is it so high (£180) and could i have a break down of the charges. they replied that the charges look OK to them and the bailiffs have included a charge for delivering the letters in a white van. why should this be extra? anyway they are going to send me a breakdown and have given me a 7 day reprieve to get my complaint in. that's nice of them!

Link to post
Share on other sites

the charges are pre-determined by law, they can charge £20 for the first visit and £15 for the second , whether they came by push bike, white van or harrier jump jet is irrelevant. the council tax staff wont necesaarily be aware of what bailiffs can charges, the council should have called off the bailiffs, and in this case it sounds as if they should neve have sent them anyway as you paid it several weeks ago.

 

these bailiffs work on peopels fera and sacer them into paying, and rely on the fact that most people are not aware of what can lawfully be charged. challenge it, they cannot charge you £180 pounds for two vists.. end of story

Edited by kfdh1962
Link to post
Share on other sites

Will I get advance notice of a bailiff visit and fees?

From 1 April 1998, local authorities must send you a letter giving 14 days notice of a proposed bailiff visit to collect council tax. County court bailiffs must issue a warning notice allowing 7 days for you to pay.

Do I have to pay the bailiff's fees?

The fees that bailiffs can charge for recovering money vary. There are fixed fees for bailiffs collecting council tax; for example, from 1 April 1998 fees for the first visit by a bailiff are £20 and £15 for a second visit, where no levy or seizure is made.

All bailiff fees (with the exception of magistrates' court bailiffs) can be looked at by the county court to see if they are reasonable or excessive. This is known as 'detailed assessment'. If you think that the bailiff's fees are excessive you should get further advice about this

Link to post
Share on other sites

try something along tehs elines, send a letter to the council tax revenues office as weel pointing out it has been paid in full and asking them to return the account to their control

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

 

I understand xxx Council has appointed you to recover my Council Tax Liability arrears for xxxx, stated as £xxx. This council tax liability was paid in full on the XXXX

 

Firstly I would like to make you aware that I am fully aware of my rights and you will not gain entry to my home under any circumstances to levy goods and I know the fees allowed under statute and when these fees can be applied.

 

I am not willing to deal with a Debt Collection Company in any way.

Please stop sending letters to me regarding this matter.

I ask you return the account to the council listed above.

At this point in time it is not clear what charges you have added to my Tax Liability arrears with xxx Council. I therefore require you to supply an itemised statement of account that you hold on me that clearly shows what charges have been added and what these charges are for giving details of dates and times etc. You are required in statute to supply this information and I look forward to this within 14 days.

 

Whilst your demands and charges are under investigation, all payments detailed above will be made directly to xxxx council

 

I am sending the council a copy of this letter and requesting that it be filled with my account for further reference.

 

I trust the above meets your approval and I look forward to your timely reply by letter.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

try something along these lines

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

 

I understand xxx Council has appointed you to recover my Council Tax Liability arrears for year xxxx, stated as £779. This council tax liability was paid in full on the XXXX

 

Firstly I would like to make you aware that I am fully aware of my rights and you will not gain entry to my home under any circumstances to levy goods and I know the fees allowed under statute and when these fees can be applied.

 

I am not willing to deal with a Debt Collection Company in any way.

Please stop sending letters to me regarding this matter.

I ask you return the account to the council listed above.

At this point in time you have added £180 in charges to my alleged Tax Liability arrears with xxx Council, although it is not clear what these charges are for. I therefore require you to supply an itemised statement of account that you hold on me that clearly shows what charges have been added and what these charges are for giving details of dates and times etc. You are required in statute to supply this information and I look forward to this within 14 days.

 

Whilst your demands and charges are under investigation, all payments detailed above will be made directly to xxxx council

 

I am sending the council a copy of this letter and requesting that it be filled with my account for further reference.

 

I trust the above meets your approval and I look forward to your timely reply by letter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update!!

 

Had a Bailiff banging on my front door at 6.32am this morning and then pushed a demand for £180 through my letter box. So much for the 7 days grace the council gave me! They haven't put any extra charges on top this time so that's a bonus.

 

I posted the letters off yesterday, one to the bailiffs recorded delivery and a copy with a cover not to the council 1st class so they should get them today and then we shall see what happens.

 

wonder what time i will get my early wake up call tomorrow!;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

tut tut , nuaghty boys, no advanced warning of a proposed visit clearly breaks the guidelines on debt collection!.. no surprise there though, these guys flout the rules all of the time..

Bailiffs collecting rent are obliged to call between sunrise and sunset, all other bailiffs can call at any time of day or night. However most bailiffs should call at a 'reasonable' time, either during normal office hours or between 8.00 a.m. or 8 p.m., again as per the guidelines.

If a bailiff calls they should provide identification or authorisation if you ask them to. Bailiffs collecting for rent must show their certificate from the county court if you ask them to. Bailiffs collecting unpaid council tax must show written authorisation from the local authority, they also have to be certieifed by the courts and specifically for the company they represent , you can demand they produce this as if they dont then they are acting unlawfully.. dont open the door though at any time!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

if a debt is dipusted they are legally obliged to investigate it further and rpove that the debt being collected is valid, you are disputing their charges which are clearly inflated and are well above what they are allowed to claim from you for the activities so far carried out. the most should be £35. they cant charge you for the third visit and they cant charge you for the van. they have not levied goods and do not have a walk in possesion order so them turning up in a van is irrelevant. even if a debt is at a stage where they were turning up to someone to seize good have done al of the above, they can still not charge more for than you could prove one could be hired for.

i had a similar situation with Equita. i refused to pay them and paid the council. they still tried to charge me (well my ex) over £400 for two hand delivered letters and a van... i wrote to them asking for the break down and sent proof the debt was paid. they never supplied the breakdonw but aftre my letters to them and the council and me phoning them acouple of times the charges were reduced to £42

Link to post
Share on other sites

exactly wemouse... nobody objects topaying whats due.. bet these clowns just rip off those who can least afford it... you could turn it around back on them and pay them the £40 quoting what they are legally obliged to charge for 2 vists only.. send proof of payment of council tax liability and tell them your business is concluded thank you very much... if they continue to chase you for other charges then you will report them to the council and to the courts that issue their licenec and even bring action against them for harrasment:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

if you want to get them off your back you could pay them just what they are entitled to, otherwise stand firm until it is returned to the council. If you want them gone and a peaceful life then just pay what they can charge and no more.. your call... and send them something like this

 

Dear Sirs,

I write again in respect to your ongoing attempts to unlawfully collect a disputed debt. I have previously advised you that the outstanding council tax liability was paid in full directly to the council on XXXXX (date) Proof of payment is enclosed.

 

The charges which you are attempting to collect from me a clearly inflated and are greater than those that you are legally entitled to collect. You are fully aware that you are only allowed to charge for 2 visits, £24.50 for the first and £18 for the second visit. You are not entitled to charge for further visits. You have not levied goods and you do not have a walk in possession order and therefore are not entitled to charge for the use of a van.

 

Please find enclosed payment for £42.5 this being the total amount you are legally entitled to for your activities relating to this liability. Any further attempts to collect this debt or further charges will be reported to the council and also to the courts issuing you bailiffs certification.

 

 

 

Yours

Edited by kfdh1962
charges updated
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...