Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unpaid Council Tax - 6 years!!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5621 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Been to see a friend of mine today and he has a few debt problems to say the least. He produced a box full of letters going back six years for unpaid council tax. So far three different firms of bailiffs have been involved, but no-one has actually crossed his doorstep. He just doesn't answer the door.

 

What is so crazy is that he probably would have been entitled to claim council tax benefit but he never quite got round to it.

 

The last letter from the bailiffs said they were referring the debt back to the council and that he may end up in prison. He actually has nothing the bailiffs could take anyway.

 

Just read the notes at the top of the thread and going to post this elsewhere on the site

 

So, questions. He has heard from someone that if he manages to pay the current year the council will be Ok and leave the remainder in the hands of the bailiffs. I am not sure about this.

 

Also, if he were to go bankrupt would the debt be written off in bankruptcy or would it remain?

 

What are his chances of getting backdated benefits?

 

Any other ideas? I have never known anyone get away with it for so long:eek:

Edited by Goldlady
Read the notes after posting!!!

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Goldlady,

 

The downfall here is that a debt due to the government doesnt die, so if he has arrears going back 15years for council tax he will have to pay it.

 

If he can sort out the current council tax issues and carry out an income and expenditure and offer payments to clear arrears then the council will have to accept it, the downfall is the bailiffs can be obstructive, so best to deal with the council if they will let you.

 

The chances of getting backdated benefits are fairly slim, unless there is some exceptional reason for not applying in the first place, the usual excuses like I didnt think I would qualify, or didnt get time to do it, or I submitted it and you lost it wont work. I think the only one to work here will be mis-advised by the council about rights to claim or mental health issues.

 

If going bankrupt - I am unsure what happens here, i dont think it can be taken into the bankruptcy, but I may be wrong.

 

With referenct to a committal to prison that is upto the magistrates to decide, the case will be referred back to the local authority and they will decide what action can be taken, committal is a last resort, if he can sort his current council tax out and make small repayments to the old debts then all the magistrates are concerned about is getting it repaid. If he can stop the debt getting bigger and it reducing each month then the Magistrates should accept that, but that is down to the individual magistrate.

 

Jax

 

Been to see a friend of mine today and he has a few debt problems to say the least. He produced a box full of letters going back six years for unpaid council tax. So far three different firms of bailiffs have been involved, but no-one has actually crossed his doorstep. He just doesn't answer the door.

 

What is so crazy is that he probably would have been entitled to claim council tax benefit but he never quite got round to it.

 

The last letter from the bailiffs said they were referring the debt back to the council and that he may end up in prison. He actually has nothing the bailiffs could take anyway.

 

Just read the notes at the top of the thread and going to post this elsewhere on the site

 

So, questions. He has heard from someone that if he manages to pay the current year the council will be Ok and leave the remainder in the hands of the bailiffs. I am not sure about this.

 

Also, if he were to go bankrupt would the debt be written off in bankruptcy or would it remain?

 

What are his chances of getting backdated benefits?

 

Any other ideas? I have never known anyone get away with it for so long:eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If he was entitled to any council tax discounts they can indeed be backdated in fact as far back as april 1993 when council tax took over from poll tax.

 

I know this because my carers discount was backdated to 1993.

 

So it maybe a good idea to check out discounts on your local council website.

 

You also do not have to give reason why you did not claim it before.

 

Regards

 

Leon

Finally if you succeed with your claim please consider a donation to consumer action group as those donations keep this site alive.

 R.I.P BOB aka ROOSTER-UK you have always been a Gent on these boards and you will be remembered for that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for the advice - it has certainly given me something to start on.

BANK CHARGES

Nat West Bus Acct £1750 reclaim - WON

 

LTSB Bus Acct £1650 charges w/o against o/s balance - WON

 

Halifax Pers Acct £1650 charges taken from benefits - WON

 

Others

 

GE Money sec loan - £1900 in charges - settlement agreed

GE Money sec loan - ERC of £2.5K valid for 15 years - on standby

FirstPlus - missold PPI of £20K for friends - WON

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...