Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
ANYBODY WHO NEEDS INFO ON YOUR LEHMANS MORTGAGE either SPML/PML/LMC/SPPL; the following are DIRECT tel#s, of the investigating & prosecuting organisations:
DO NOT say you are from CAG-only directly affected or a concerned citizen. 1. Companies House: Kevin Hughes(Compliance Manager-main) @ 02920 380 633 2. CH : Lee Jenkins(prosecuting Amany Attia for SPML/PML) @ 02920 380 643 3. CH : Mark Youde(accounts compliance) @ 02920 380 955 4. Companies Investigation Branch(CIB) : Charlotte Allan @ 0207 596 6108 (part of the Insolvency Service) investigating all the Lehman lenders 5. CIB : Jeremy Pilcher('unofficial'-consumer/company law) : @ 0207 637 6231
__________________ File YOUR 'Companies Investigation Branch'- CIB complaint online NOW!!!!
a) Consistency of disciplinary action is very important. Thus if other employee's are doing this and no action is taken, this could make your dismissal unfair if you can prove it.
b) In addition the rule seems unclear as you were told by your boss 1/4 hour extra was ok
c) Custom and practice - if this happened for a long time are the new rules that the 1/4 hour is ok, you could argue this is in effect the 'rule'
Best of luck
Che
NB How long did you work there?
......................... ......................... ....................
Please post on a thread before sending a PM. My opinion's are not expressed as agent or representative of The Consumer Action Group. Always seek professional advice from a qualified legal adviser before acting. If I have helped you please feel free to click on the black star.
I am sorry that work means I don't get into the Employment Forum as often as I would like these days, but nonetheless I'll try to pop in when I can.
can you see where im going? if it was give and take and was generically accepted then you have a strong case of unfair dismisal
If it was all take however, you may struggle regardless how many other people were doing it (IMO) notwithstanding they should still follow procedure and you should have been given the opurtunity to "see the error of your ways" especially as you genuinely though it was a acceptable practice.
i booked
7.30-8.30 travel
tracking report
7.39-8.19
the biggest difference was 21 min
7.00-8.00 travel
tracking report
7.21-8.03
on that occasion i was having car trouble (their car) i let the office know, but that was 3 weeks previous to my dismissal. I wasn't even asked why?, they just said this is unacceptable. i stated that the tracking report was a history of the veichles actions, but not my working duties ,ie
completing paperwork, using the phone to speak to a customer.
i stated that the tracking report was a history of the veichles actions, but not my working duties ,ie
completing paperwork, using the phone to speak to a customer.
Very Good Point,
you stated that the biggest discrepancy was 21 mins and that was over 3 weeks ago, does this mean that the inconsistancies were few and far between???? and when they were only within a few mins.
sacked because of tracking report
because my timesheets dont match my tracking reports.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by midge61
