Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Critical illness stalling from Scot prov


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5619 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone

 

In July i was diagnosed with a brain tumour after suffering with really bad head aches and Sickness for 3/4 months before that.

 

In addition these symptoms i am becoming very forgetful !

Luckily my wife remembered that we had a critical illness policy with scot prov -

 

I took out two policies with them in 2003 one for me and one for my business - (with four small children, it seemed a sencible precaution)

 

Obviously now its November and I still don't have an answer from them as to when or if they will pay up. Its really frustrating not knowing if after all I planned, if my family will be or not be covered should the worse happen.

 

Dose any one here have any experience / knowledge about how these companies work ??

 

i would be very grateful for any advice / help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, jacahani.

 

Sorry to hear about the situation you find yourself in, I'm not too clued up on Insurance :rolleyes: but I'll move your post to start a new thread in the appropriate Forum, hopefully there, you will get the help and advice you require.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow

 

Thank you both so much for your quick responce.

 

Big mac

 

so far they have said very little other than they have been awaiting medical reports.

 

Most recently they mention discussions with a ' re insurer' what ever that is ????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Jacahani.

 

Who's your insurance with? Did you get through a broker or are you talking to the insurers direct?

 

You need to clarify with them what they mean by "re insurer". It may be that your original insco was taken over/merged/bought by another one, and then new policies get written, and when one of the "older" policies kicks in, they have to go find out what terms these do or don't cover.

 

Regardless of the above, it is not acceptable that you should still be waiting for a response, so you need to take a firmer stance by now (easier said than done in your condition, I know). Something on the lines of "I put in a claim on X date, it has been X weeks and you have failed to let me know the outcome, please let me have a response/update within 7 days"...

 

If you need any help in writing the letters or working out the terms of your policy, just holler. And all the best. :-)

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for your help bookworm

 

The company is scotish provident, i took the policy out with a broker, although they are sending me directly to the ins company.

 

I will phone the insurance co again and get some clarification, i was nervous to do so in case they took offence and that this may have affected the out come.

 

Thanks again,

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

Just come of the phone to scot prov - as my claim consists of 2 policies

 

1) personnel - £200,000

 

2) Key Man ( Business ) - £250,000

 

The total amount is too much for them, so they have used an insurance company to offset the risk. This is the re-insurer.

 

They are waiting a decision from them, my frustration now is that I was not informed of this re-insurer. surely the re-insurer decsision is between them and scot -prov and should not effect me. Is that logical ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know nothing of business insurance policies, I'm sorry, so I am not going to try and guess what that entails. How does it work? What do they each cover? The person, loss of earnings, mortgage?

 

Anyway, the fact that they chose to get another insco involved is irrelevant to you. Your contract is between them and you and I would suggest that you go ahead with the firm letter, adding in the element that you understand the re-insurer thing, but that it is not your problem, you took an insurance policy with them, a well known household name, which presumably carries a promise to pay promptly in case of claim, and is there any chance of seeing the money before you die of old age, never mind cancer? And I am quite serious, I would use those words. It is just completely outrageous that they should delay so much in the case of a claim under critical illness :mad: It's got to the point where if you don't shock them into action, they'll quite happily sit on your claim until the cows come home.

 

Bottom line is that even if they had been banking with Northern Rock and had their savings invested in Icelandic bonds, that makes no difference to the fact that YOU need that money now, you paid your premiums, and now you are claiming and unless they have a reason to decline cover, then you want that money now. Therefore you need to tell them that you want a decision and you want it within 7 days or you will go to the Ombudsman, as their delays are simply not good enough. :mad:

 

Don't be afraid of "offending them", they have heard far worse and don't give a toss what you think of them anyway. As the saying goes, it's not personal, it's business. :-(

 

I've got children to take to hospital and stuff today so will be out for most of the day, but I'll keep an eye on your thread as and when, any questions, just holler and I'll answer when I get back. :-) If you need help with the letter, or want to post it on here for comments, no problem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Jacahani

 

I have PM'd you with the answers.

One other question, when did you make the claim? I know you were diagnosed in July but did you make the claim in July as well?

 

It might be that the "insurance" company are waiting on medical evidence which has been requested by the "reinsurance" company. Having said that, you should chase the insurance company at least twice weekly!

 

Just a bit of information. A reinsurance company normally has some agreed service standards with the insurance company with regards to claims. These are between 24 and 48 hours. This means that the reinsurance company has to come back to the insurance company within these limits. This doesn't mean they have to make or have made a decision but they could be requesting more information.

 

I hope this helps.

BobbyH

Link to post
Share on other sites

UPDATE

 

Thank you all so much for your help, it's quite overwhelming from feeling small and insignificant to having a strong and knowledgeable team behind you within 24 hours. Thanks should be given to the CAB for recommending the site. (all be it unoffically)

 

So this afternoon I spoke very firmly to broker and ins co and got more information than i had recieved for the last five months. :eek:

 

It would seem the ins co were awaiting reports from my doctors which were recieved two weeks ago, last thursday they sent a report to the re - insurers and have been promised a reply by this thursday.

 

I have been advised that three criteria must be met.

 

1) Is the diagnosis correct - Yep I even have a picture !

2) was there any undisclosed information on my medical records which would have stopped them insuring me. - No

3) Dose my infliction match the criteria from my policy document - well i suppose thats the bit down to interpretation ?

so my assumption is that the insurance company must have okay'd things and have now sent information to the re- insurance company.

 

So it seems like things have been progressing alot more than I thought, although it seems a bit rough that when you are at your weakest you must be at your strongest to learn anything !!!!!!!!!!!!?:-x

 

thank you all again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been advised that three criteria must be met.

 

1) Is the diagnosis correct - Yep I even have a picture ! No offence, but please don't show us!!! :shock:

2) was there any undisclosed information on my medical records which would have stopped them insuring me. - No

3) Dose my infliction match the criteria from my policy document - well i suppose thats the bit down to interpretation ? Not according to the ABI themselves, that shouldn't be. ;-)

http://www.abi.org.uk/Public/Consumer/Medical/5442_Critical_Illness_new.pdf

 

So it seems like things have been progressing alot more than I thought, although it seems a bit rough that when you are at your weakest you must be at your strongest to learn anything !!!!!!!!!!!!?:-x

I'm sorry to say that in some cases, the least scrupulous insurance companies have it factored in their costs how many of their clients will die before a claim is complete and the relatives are then too distraught/unknowledgeable to carry on with the claim. :-( (allegedly! :rolleyes:)

 

Anyway, please let us know the outcome of your claim, and hope you feel better soon. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had a quick look at the critical illnesses covered now for Scot Prov plans on their key features online and it say "Benign Brain Tumour - Resulting in permanent symptoms".

 

So if this fits you, I can't see how they can decline!

 

Best of luck

BobbyH

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry to say that in some cases, the least scrupulous insurance companies have it factored in their costs how many of their clients will die before a claim is complete and the relatives are then too distraught/unknowledgeable to carry on with the claim. :-( (allegedly! :rolleyes:)

 

Anyway, please let us know the outcome of your claim, and hope you feel better soon. :-)

 

Bookworm can you elaborate?

After spending most of my adult life pricing these sorts of risks for hundreds of insurance companies, I can honestly say that factoring in costs for this sort of thing doesn't happen!

 

You would be very surprised to know that most claims are notified to the insurance company very quickly, in a lot of cases the following day!!!

 

BobbyH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they took there time, but I have had a responce.

 

It would seem that scot prov are not happy with the definition of the claim.

 

This was the only element that there could be any doubt. And as you would expect they have done so.

 

I don't have any thing in writing yet, when I do I'll let you all know.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You would be very surprised to know that most claims are notified to the insurance company very quickly, in a lot of cases the following day!!!

 

BobbyH

Having dealt with claims coming in weeks or even months after the event, you're right, I would be very surprised.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Well they took there time, but I have had a responce.

 

It would seem that scot prov are not happy with the definition of the claim.

 

This was the only element that there could be any doubt. And as you would expect they have done so.

 

Jacahani

Can you tell me exactly what you put on the claim form for your illness?

If you have the policy documents, what does it say is covered on them?

If they are not happy with the definition then perhaps your surgeon/doctor has provided them with something else which has made them "not happy"!

 

BobbyH

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is worth speaking to your GP or specialist about what they put on the medical report that they sent to Scot Prov. Your Dr will be able to show you a copy of the report and this may clarify what the problem is. It is worth taking a copy of the critical illness definitions to the Dr's with you and he will then be able to tell you whther you meet the criteria for a pay out.

 

It is hopefully something simple like your GP not having the full details from your hospital consultant yet so not putting everything on the medical report.

 

When it comes to medical reports always get your GP involved the insurer should not by law discuss with you directly anything they have received in a medical report it all has to go via your doctor.

 

Good Luck!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear your claim was rejected. I have recently had a Scot Prov claim approved but my condition was clearly outlined in their documents as being covered.

 

I would suggest you complain to them first and then go the Obudsman who might be able to help you.

 

Good luck and I hope your condition improves.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks everyone for your help and support.

 

I have the letter now from S P and as indicated the point of argument is wether the criteria is exactly met, I will see my doctor soon and hopefully get a definitive,

 

Amazing though, I have a brain tumour that is making work impossible and hence finances difficult, five years ago when we decided to have a larger family we took the descision to increase our insurance to protect us and our business. We chose what we thought was the best company with the finiest reputation and yet, when we have to claim, when we are at our weakest and lowest it seem we have to fight tooth and nail to recieve what should be fairly ours. I feel very strongly that these insurances should be black and white and not open to interpretation !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If SP follow the ABI defnitions, then this is what I have found on the ABI website:

 

Existing Definition

Benign brain tumour

A non-malignant tumour in the brain

resulting in permanent deficit to the

neurological system.

 

Tumours or lesions in the pituitary gland are

not covered.

 

Possible future Definition

Benign brain tumour - with symptoms of

permanent brain damage

A non-malignant tumour in the brain,

meninges or cranial nerves within the skull

resulting in persisting clinical symptoms of

permanent neurological deficit.

The following are not covered:

· tumours or lesions in the pituitary gland

· angiomas

The possible future definition was based on a 2005 paper which is probably now the true definition.

Can you tell me what it actually says on you policy for Brain Tumour?

Sorry to ask this but are there any symptoms of permanent brain damage?

I really hope all works out for you.

BobbyH

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I will get the exact wording on Monday -

 

But the devil is in the detail -

 

Permenant, before or after, very risky (potentially life threaterning Surgery) or possible epelepsy / paralysis / complete memory loss

 

Suddenly - headache - sickness - reduced eye sight / memory - dosen't seem so bad.

 

You see there is no guarantee the surgery would make a difference but the insurance company imply that with out it, there is possible doubt as to the permenacy of the symptoms -

 

With young kids - employees (with families- to support ) what do you do ???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...