Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Good Evening, I've got a fairly simple question but I'll provide some context incase needed. I've pursued a company that has operations in england despite them having no official office anywhere. I've managed to find a site they operate from and the papers there have been defended so I know they operate there. They've filed a defence which is honestly the worst defence ever, and despite being required to provide their witness evidence, they have not and have completely ignored the courts and my request for copies of it. I'm therefore considering applying to strike out their defence on the grounds the defence was rubbish and that they haven't provided any evidence for the trial. However, it has a trial date set for end of june, and a civil application wouldn't get heard until a week before then, so hardly worth it. However, my local court is very good at dealing with paper applications (i.e ones that don't need hearings, and frankly I think they are literally like 1-2 days from when you submit it to when a Judge sees it. I'm wondering if I can apply to strikeout a defence without a hearing OR whether a hearing is required for a strikeout application.   Thanks
    • I have just opened another bank acc with lloyds (i have a few already) After doing some research they may have some relation to tsb or be apart of the same group will this cause me issue if my salary is paid into my lloyds account? Also, if the debts do go into default and nothing is paid then after 6 years it all goes away? As the DCAs cannot do anything? I do want to start paying in like 3/4 months or do you advise I leave it if it goes into default? again sorry for all the questions, i am just processing everything
    • one reply only  follow post 2 of letter of claim <<clickme link. dx
    • Sorry, I got confused  Yes, it states all three   Thanks, 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5584 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

My husband and I took out mortgage life insurance back in 2003. At the time we were told that we must take out the life insurance to get the mortage. We pay £60 per month for this. Our bank is the First Trust and it was their Financial adviser that told us this. We are both self employed and our business account is with the same back.

The insurance is with the Norwich Union. Have we been mis sold this policy?

 

Any advice wouls be helpful

 

Laura:?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello and Welcome, Laura.

 

Sorry I can't help you with your question, but I'll move this thread to the appropriate Forum, hopefully you'll get some good advice in there.

 

Regards.

 

Scott.

Any advice I give is honest and in good faith.:)

If in doubt, you should seek the opinion of a Qualified Professional.

If you can, please donate to this site.

Help keep it up and active, helping people like you.

If you no longer require help, please do what you can to help others

RIP: Rooster-UK - MARTIN3030 - cerberusalert

Link to post
Share on other sites

was your adviser independent or not ? Im an adviser myself , it is advisable to get cover for life critical illness income protection etc but it all depends have you got the best have you got the cheapest etc For most loans etc they can suggest you take they cant insist but at the end of the day it depends what you can prove and whether their paperwork is up to scratch etc most people would be stupid to take on a commitment without a fallback situation which these types of policy are but it all depends if he was independent linked to norwich in some way ie through panel or tied agent etc regards gaz

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Hi

 

My husband and I took out mortgage life insurance back in 2003. At the time we were told that we must take out the life insurance to get the mortage. We pay £60 per month for this. Our bank is the First Trust and it was their Financial adviser that told us this. We are both self employed and our business account is with the same back.

The insurance is with the Norwich Union. Have we been mis sold this policy?

 

Any advice wouls be helpful

 

Laura:?

 

Like Gaz2954 says, they can't insist you have any life cover, but is advisable to have it to cover the outstanding mortgage once you die. Life cover is a good benefit to have!! if you can afford it. If you don't need it/want it, then stop paying the premiums and the policy will lapse.

 

As for mis-selling, you could argue that they did by insisting you have it to get the mortgage but personally I would keep the policy going (if you can afford the £60 per month) or perhaps shop around for a cheaper policy!

 

Bobbyh

Link to post
Share on other sites

you are perfectly within your rights to shop around, find another Life insurance policy and then cancel the other one, you can get it for far cheaper than £60 per month.

Lula

 

Lula v Abbey - Settled

Lula v Abbey (2) - Settled

Lula v Abbey (3) - Stayed

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If its £60 pm may be it includes Critical illness cover too and or Income Protection as well so really you need a like for like comparison also it may have been loaded for medical reasons only you will know that but I agree you can shop around but whats the cheapest may not be the same or the best .Pm me if you want some quotes and Ill ask a few questions and get you some figures but dont cancel and then get a new policy like my colleague says get a new one ready to start before doing anything with the other . Regards Gaz

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...