Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Well tbh that’s good news and something she can find out for herself.  She has no intention if peace.  I’m going to ask the thread stays open a little longer.   It seems she had not learned that I am just not the one!!!!  plus I have received new medical info from my vet today.   To remain within agreement, I need to generally ask for advice re:  If new medical information for the pup became apparent now- post agreement signing, that added proof a second genetic disease (tested for in those initial tests in the first case but relayed incorrectly to me then ), does it give me grounds for asking a court to unseal the deed so I can pursue this new info….. if she persists in being a pain ? If generally speaking, a first case was a cardiac issue that can be argued as both genetic and congenital until a genetic test is done and then a second absolute genetic only disease was then discovered, is that deemed a new case or grounds for unsealing? Make sense ?   This disease is only ever genetic!!!!  Rather more damning and indisputable proof of genetic disease breeding with no screening yk prevent.   The vet report showing this was uploaded in the original N1 pack.  Somehow rekeyed as normal when I was called with the results.  A vet visit today shows they were not normal and every symptom he has had reported in all reports uploaded from day one are related to the disease. 
    • Hi Roberto, Read some of the other threads here about S Sixes - they all follow the same routine of threats, threats, then nothing. When you do this, you'll see how many have been in exactly the same situation as you are. Keep us updated as necessary .............
    • Nationwide's takeover of Virgin Money is hitting the headlines as thousands of customers protest that they will not get a vote on whether it should happen.View the full article
    • unrelated to the agreement then, could have come from Lowells filing cabinet (who lowells - they dont do that - oh yes they do!! just look at a few lowell paypal EU court claim threads) no name and address for time of take out either which they MUST contain. just like the rest of the agreement then..utter bogroll that proves nothing toward you ... slippery lowells as usual it's only a case management discussion on 26 April 2024 at 10:00am by WebEx. thats good simply refer to the responses you made on your 4a form response only. pleanty of SPC thread here to read before the 26th i suggest you read at least one a day. dx  
    • I think you have the supremacy of contract as it allows you to park in designated areas. I would argue that there being parking enforcement there clearly means its to be used as parking and as such you can use it under your lease. Only need to worry if they ever follow through with a letter of claim and a claimform though
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Car written off. Help needed!


LordLee
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5640 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi.

 

I own an old but very reliable VW Golf (M reg 1995) and was involved in a prang recently. It is totally repairable, just damage to the drivers side wing, headlight, bumper and grill.

 

My insurance company have written the car off stating it would cost £1100 to repair (ridiculous) and valuing my car at £550. I had my car valued a little while back and it was £900.

 

I'm not sure what my options are? Can i argue they are incorrect? If i buy the car back from them i doubt they will give me a decent quote for insurance (if at all).

 

Any ideas anyone?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bit of additional info as just spoke to them... Apparently my car would've been valued at £800 but they've taken off £250 because the damaged wing was fading (before accident) and a wing mirror case was cracked. Also the assessor has said there is additional pre accident damage but he has failed to specify.

 

This is not true... There is no other damage by the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK it's what is known as an 'economic total loss', ie it would cost more to repair than to replace.

 

The damage sounds cosmetic, so you can ask for a settlement where you retain the salvage, but you will have to pay for it (the insurance company will have a rough idea what the salvage is valued at (ie what a breakers yard would pay them for it) and will settle with you keeping the salvage if you agree to have this figure deducted from your settlement offer as well as your excess).

 

Ask them for a settlement figure where you retain the salvage and decide if you want to do that, insuring a car in these circumstances is quite common and doesn't usually affect premiums, but they will need proof you have carried out the repairs.

 

Mossy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok... the plot thickens. Once again, any advice welcome.

 

I know a reputable mechanic who can repair the car for £290. Yes... £290, way off the £1100 they seem to think it will cost to repair.

 

I called my insurance company and told them not only do I dispute the value of the car but also the estimate for repair. I was told that as this £290 quote is within the amount of my excess (£300) then as long as their Total Loss Dep agree, i can repair the car myself and all will be hunkydory.

 

Alas no. This is not possible as the Total Loss 'team' deem the car a 'Category B' Write off. They told me this means the car has come to the end of it's life and will not be taxed or insured in the future. All of this for a car that needs a new wing, headlight and indicator.

 

I tell the insurance company it is deemed a Cat B but i do not agree with the estimate placing my car in this category.

 

I am told that i may get an independent engineer to perform another estimate. If it comes in under their original price AND THEY AGREE WITH IT... they may repay me the engineer costs and proceed.

 

I'm beside myself with what to do? They will not budge on the car's value or total loss. All over a prang that requires superficial repair.

 

Any advice anyone? Where can i find these 'Engineers' and how much would they cost?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cat B is beyond economical repair and/or severe structural damage. It can have parts sold from it, but must be destroyed and such destruction notified to DVLA - it cannot be put back on the road.

 

Cat C is repairable salvage. Generally this applies to older vehicles where the value is low or for stolen cars that are recovered after the insurance co. has paid out the claim. Cat C requires a VIC before being allowed back on the road and Cat C will be recorded on HPI.

 

For an insurance repair, the quote of £ 1,100 will include obtaining new parts. This will be difficult for a 15+ year-old car. Your mechanics £ 290 probably means second-hand parts.

 

Your best bet is to get the insurers to put in writing why they consider the vehicle to be Cat B rather than Cat C. If it is purely on economic grounds, they may be persuaded to declare Cat C and sell you the vehicle 'for salvage'. However, if their engineer's report has noted any structural damage to the inner wings or chassis rails, then it probably is a Cat B.

 

You have obviously had a body shop look at it before the insurer's engineer inspected - what did they say?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK... just chatted to the mechanic I had look at the car (not insurers engineer). The mechanic said it needed the new wing, headlight and indicator. The ONLY problem with mechanics that maybe at issue here is the radiator. The radiator is fine... but may have been moved half an inch forward. It just eases back. No leaks etc.

 

Yes the quote for £290 was with 2nd hand parts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...