Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

"Rent includes council tax" - who is responsible for it?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5666 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I have had the contract (the tenancy agreement prepared by the agency) with my landlord for 3 years now. A few weeks ago he met me informing me that "there are problems with The Council as they did not know my flat is rented (...)". He informed me that I should expect the letter from the Council demanding the council tax to be paid for last 3 years! We checked the contract that we have and it clearly says that the council tax is included in rent ("Rent includes council tax"). The situation is a bit strange to me as I cannot belive the landlord was not aware of that.

My questions are:

 

1. If the council asks me to pay should I pay it?

2. Who is reponsible for paying c. tax in this situation?

3. Does "Rent includes council tax" mean that the Landlord has to pay it?

4. What should I do if the Council requests the payment from me?

 

Your advice would be much appreciated.

 

Thank you

Robert E.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At first glimpse, it certainly seems that "rent includes council tax " means exactly that. You have paid your share of the council tax in with whatever rent payments you have made.

Do you have written confirmation of all your rent payments, and if so contact the council along with your signed contract.

If you make them aware that the landlord has approached you regards this matter, they may be able to delve deeper into it.

 

If they persist and want payment from you, i would contact a solicitor.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello bazak1

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

> Do you have written confirmation of all your rent payments

 

It was agreed that I would be paying by bank transfers and this is what I have been doing for 3 years. I don't have any receipts or invoices for every month. The only thing I can get is the bank statement confirming that I transfered the amount of XXXX pounds to the landlord account x times. Would that be enough?

 

Do you think I will have to pay the council tax and then claim it from landlord or I should force him to pay.

 

Cheers

 

Robert E.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I personally wouldnt want to be in the position where i was forced to pay it, because in theory you have already paid it, and have the contract and statements to prove it.

The tenant in most cases is ( obviously ) responsible for paying the rent, council tax,water and sewerage charges, BUT as yours have been included in the rent, and you have paid your rent up to date then it is not your problem.

If for some reason you do actually have to pay the council tax to them direct for the time you have been there then i would seek a refund for the same amount from your landlord and/or compensation for the grief caused.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

As i said, the tenant is obviously liable to pay the council tax, but a contract is a legal written agreement between all parties ( otherwise why have them ? ).

 

The following is taken from the SHELTER UK website, giving advise for tenants.

What should I check for in a written agreement?

 

If you have a written agreement, it should set out the rights and responsibilities you have while you're renting, and should list the terms and conditions you and your landlord need to stick to while you're living there. Read it carefully before you sign it and ask the landlord to clarify anything you're unsure of. Certain rights and obligations will apply regardless of what the agreement says - the landlord's repairing obligations, for example.

Check whether your agreement includes information such as:

  • the name of the tenant(s)
  • the address of the property (or room) you are renting
  • the name and address of the landlord and the letting agent if there is one
  • how much the rent is, when it is due and how it should be paid
  • what the rent covers - does it include any bills, COUNCIL TAX, water rates or other charges?
  • how long the agreement is for
  • whether you have to pay a deposit, and if so, what it covers and what circumstances will mean you don't get it back
  • whether you can leave before the end of the tenancy, and if so, how much notice you have to give
  • what furniture, if any, will be provided
  • who is responsible for getting repairs done (the landlord will always be responsible for external and structural repairs, and safety, regardless of what it says)
  • whether you can sublet
  • whether you can have lodgers
  • whether you can pass the tenancy on to anyone else
  • whether there are any other rules, for example, about pets, guests or smoking.

visit http://shelter.dev.squiz.co.uk/get_advice/advice_topics/renting_and_leasehold/private_tenants_rights -

 

You can also visit the Office of fair trading at The Office of Fair Trading: making markets work well for consumers

All i can say is that its pointless signing a contract if its not enforceable.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed BUT, as a tenant surely your contract is with your landlord/lady and yourself.

As the LL owns the property, isnt the bill theirs, but then obviously payed by tenants.

One other question i personally would like to know is..... If a landlord owns a house and lets three bedrooms etc to three tenants, does the council tax bill remain the same amount but split between four people.

 

For information, the below was copied from a lawyers advice website

 

Council Tax and Bills

Who is responsible for Council Tax?

If the occupier lives in a self-contained flat (even if part of your house), it is likely that the local council will bill him or her directly for Council Tax. If he or she only rents a room or rooms at your address, you will normally be responsible for paying the Council Tax. But you can ask the occupier for a contribution or include an amount to cover the cost of Council Tax in the rent charged. However, who is responsible for paying Council Tax can also depend on the terms of the agreement entered into. If there is any doubt as to who is liable to pay Council Tax, contact the local council.

Owner's liability

 

The owner (rather than the resident) of certain types of property is always liable for council tax. These properties are:

  1. Residential care homes and nursing homes
  2. Properties lived in by religious communities
  3. Houses in multiple occupation (where the residents pay rent separately for their own room or part of the property)
  4. A property which is the main home of someone in domestic service and occasionally lived in by the owner.
  5. Homes of ministers of religion, from which they perform their duties

These are just some of the differing reasons at why Tenants ARENT always liable.

Hope this clears some of the confusion up.

Please note that although my advice is offered, you should consult your legal representative before taking ANY action.

 

 

have a nice day !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...