Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
My daughter is 18 years old.... older than the 12/13 year-olds that the vaccine is aimed at.... yet has been offered it at school (6th form). She's already been in a relationship as well, so has been sexually active.
Does anyone know if there are any real benefits to her having it at her age ?.... after being in a relationship ? We have to have the consent forms back by Wednesday and I'm still sitting on the fence...
Number 4, Stygia Avenue, Hell...come in, we have beer and Pringles.
Posts
1,908
Re: The HPV Vaccine - is it a good idea ?
Go for Gardasil privately if you can afford it - the Government offered one only offers protection against two strains of papilloma, unlike Gardasil which offers protection against four, and genital warts in addition.
Just because she is already sexually active, doesn't mean she can't get HPV and subsequent cancer later on.
Our 13 year old in Scotland was coerced into getting the jab at her school, despite her not wanting it and despite us sending in the permission slip with a big fat "NO" on it.
And she is diabetic which we feel adds to the complications.
so i would say, if you really dont want your daughter to get jabbed, dont think you are protected by the consent form because that didnt work for us.
our story is on my blog ( search for: Tall Skinny Kiwi: HPV vaccination and the coercion of our 13 year old diabetic daughter ) and i think comes out on the papers today
I've not heard of Gardasil.... and don't trust the Government anyway, which is one of the reasons why I'm so hesitant about this. The leaflet says that the NHS HPV jab protects girls who are not sexually active... so I'm wondering if my daughter having the jab at 18 years old is a waste of time... as the implication seems to be that it only protects girls who are not sexually active, which is why the injections are given at a young age. Do you know if Gardasil still offers protection against the disease(s) when a girl is already sexually active ?
I'm so sorry to read your story Kiwi.... and I hope there's some kind of comeback for you over this.
PLEASE NOTE: I AM NO LONGER AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF THIS FORUM AND FROM FEBRUARY 2012, WILL RESPOND TO POSTS ON SUBSCRIBED THREADS ONLY.
hi. i think you should talk to your family physician for advice. what i know is that Gardasil is given in USA and Cervarix in UK but they are related.
i do not know if you can get it in Uk but since there are 20 deaths associated with Gardasil, and thousands of serious medical cases induced from the vaccination, you might want to think twice about asking for it.
I have heard that the vaccination still works if the patient has not yet contracted the HPV sexually transmitted disease. For a girl who is planning to be sexually active with multiple partners, it is probably a good idea but still not as good as the only proven way to prevent HPV which is a monogamous sexual relationship with a single healthy individual . . . which is what our daughter is looking forward to.
The HP virus is strongly linked to cervical cancer, I would have no hesitation in getting my 17 year old vaccinated (although she is sadly no longer a virgin). I think we have to everything possible to protect our youngsters and reduce the incidence of cervical cancer which is a devastating cancer that affects young and not so young folk. I still think we need to push the importance of regular cervical smears, whether vaccinated or not.
The issue of consent is a serious one - no one should be vaccinated without consent, I hope complaints have been made through the proper channels.
hi. i think you should talk to your family physician for advice. what i know is that Gardasil is given in USA and Cervarix in UK but they are related.
i do not know if you can get it in Uk but since there are 20 deaths associated with Gardasil, and thousands of serious medical cases induced from the vaccination, you might want to think twice about asking for it.
I have heard that the vaccination still works if the patient has not yet contracted the HPV sexually transmitted disease. For a girl who is planning to be sexually active with multiple partners, it is probably a good idea but still not as good as the only proven way to prevent HPV which is a monogamous sexual relationship with a single healthy individual . . . which is what our daughter is looking forward to.
but, i am not a doctor. just a father.
I'm inclined to let this one pass and not encourage my daughter to be vaccinated now, after all.
Poppynurse... I understand about protecting our children as much as possible, but the HPV vaccine doesn't seem to be all it's cracked up to be IMO.
From my own viewpoint, I've had a dodgy smear test myself in the past; not through my own promiscuity, but from my ex's... This was successfully treated before it had the chance to develop into anything serious and some 10 years later, my recent smear test is completely clear.
Although my daughter is not promiscuous either... no-one can guarantee how any of her future partners will choose to lead their lives and the only thing I have rammed home to her is the importance of regular STD checks for her own peace of mind. Once she's old enough to have smear tests, then the same priniciple will apply.
If the HPV vaccine was offering a higher rate of protection against more strains of the virus than it currently is.... then I would be more inclined to trust it.... but something is holding me back from doing so and I'm inclined to go with that gut instinct for now.
PLEASE NOTE: I AM NO LONGER AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF THIS FORUM AND FROM FEBRUARY 2012, WILL RESPOND TO POSTS ON SUBSCRIBED THREADS ONLY.
I havent consented to my 12 year old daughter having the vaccine for various reasons but we agreed to look at it again in a few years. But now after what TallSkinnyKiwi has said im worried that they will just go ahead anyway.
A quick google for tallskinnykiwi will allow you to make up you own mind as to whether he / she / it speaks from a position of authority or not. It seems to me that they probably have a google alert which promots them to jump on any internet forum thread that mentions the HPV vaccine.
Personally, my family and I will continue to take advice from qualified medical professionals, such as my GP, who has 5 years of university training, the same again in hospital training, and over a decade in general practice, over and above agenda driven FUD from a stranger on the internet, who's daughter may wel be lying to them.
But, at the end of the day, it's your (or your childrens' choice) as to whether they are innoculated against a particularly unpleasant disease.
My daughter is 12 and has just had the 1st of the 3 hpv jabs last week i read alot up on it and i watched that programme that jane moore did on tv and most people are for it my way of thinking at the end of the day was it is a new vaccination i,m sure there was the same concerns amongst parents when the tetanus,polio,mmr etc etc came out now there are not many parents who would not give thier child these jabs
I can not personally take the chance of me saing no to this vaccination and then god forbid my daughter developes cervical cancer when she is older as for already sexually active the nurse at my daughters school doing the jabs asked all the girls if there was a chance they could be pregnant
Personally, my family and I will continue to take advice from qualified medical professionals, such as my GP, who has 5 years of university training, the same again in hospital training, and over a decade in general practice, over and above agenda driven FUD from a stranger on the internet, who's daughter may wel be lying to them.
I respect your view.... but qualified medical professionals don't always get it right either.... Just something to bear in mind.
PLEASE NOTE: I AM NO LONGER AN ACTIVE MEMBER OF THIS FORUM AND FROM FEBRUARY 2012, WILL RESPOND TO POSTS ON SUBSCRIBED THREADS ONLY.
Having the vaccination wont mean that your daughter will be protected against cervical cancer.
Maybe in a year or two when there is more data available we will take the decision to have it done....both my children have had all of their vaccinations up till now, so im not against vaccinations.
well, its true - i am not a medical professional as it pointed out. i am just a father of a daughter jabbed against her will and mine. and i am just learning about all this HPV stuff
but does that really disqualify me from having an opinion?
and the fact that I am a Christian should not really come into it. If i was an atheist, i would still be really upset and would still wonder why the law was broken to push an agenda through.
if you will only listen to a medical doctor, then do a google search for teh book called "The Truth About Vaccines: How We Are Used as Guinea Pigs Without Knowing It" by a medical expert Dr Richard Halvorsen
He was quoted on yesterdays article on the Sunday Express "Girl Gets Sex Jab against will" [front page] about our daughter as saying that he would not give this injection to his own daughter.
i tend to agree with him, but . . . we each need to figure it our for ourselves, dont we?
I respect your view.... but qualified medical professionals don't always get it right either.... Just something to bear in mind.
Also to bear in mind, they do have the weight of authority, evidence and knowlege on their side.
Originally Posted by scatz1972
Having the vaccination will mean that your daughter will be protected against 70% of cervical cancers.
Fixed that for you there.
Originally Posted by scatz1972
Maybe in a year or two when there is more data available we will take the decision to have it done....both my children have had all of their vaccinations up till now, so im not against vaccinations.
Which data in particular are you waiting for? Live epedemiology studies? I doubt that these will have any significant deviation from existing studies and clinical trials.
I'm not sure I understand the reluctance being displayed.
well, its true - i am not a medical professional as it pointed out. i am just a father of a daughter jabbed against her will and mine. and i am just learning about all this HPV stuff
but does that really disqualify me from having an opinion?
No. But neither does not lend any authority to that opinion.
Originally Posted by tallskinnykiwi
and the fact that I am a Christian should not really come into it. If i was an atheist, i would still be really upset and would still wonder why the law was broken to push an agenda through.
How does that have any relevance? Why bring it up in the first place?
Originally Posted by tallskinnykiwi
if you will only listen to a medical doctor, then do a google search for teh book called "The Truth About Vaccines: How We Are Used as Guinea Pigs Without Knowing It" by a medical expert Dr Richard Halvorsen
He was quoted on yesterdays article on the Sunday Express "Girl Gets Sex Jab against will" [front page] about our daughter as saying that he would not give this injection to his own daughter.
i tend to agree with him, but . . . we each need to figure it our for ourselves, dont we?
It is evident that Halvorsen has an agenda. He makes money by perpetuating the myth that combined vaccination is bad. Each and every claim that he, and other antivaccinationists makes about combined vaccines have been solidly refuted, through evidence based reasoning.
Should your daughter have been vaccinated against her will? No - Probably not. But we've only heard one side of that particular story, and I am calling your credibility into question.
My Real Name - Why quote what I wrote, then edit it?
I dont know about anyone else on this thread but I find you quite aggresive.....thankfully I have just located my ignore list so that should remedy that.
My Real Name - Why quote what I wrote, then edit it?
I was correcting your statement.
Originally Posted by scatz1972
Having the vaccination wont mean that your daughter will be protected against cervical cancer.
That is a false statement. I fixed it to read:
Originally Posted by scatz1972
Having the vaccination will mean that your daughter will be protected against 70% of cervical cancers.
Hence the "Fixed that for you there".
Originally Posted by scatz1972
I dont know about anyone else on this thread but I find you quite aggresive.....thankfully I have just located my ignore list so that should remedy that.
One of the perils of the written word is that intonation, inflection, and nuance is lost. The reader will often infer meaning that is entirely different to what the author wishes to convey.
To illustrate, I could infer that you are thankful, because you are unable to enter into a reasoned discussion, or I could infer that you are thankful because you do not want to listen to opinion that contradicts your own.
Either way, it's you prerogative, to which you are entirely welcome. Odd that you should feel the need to inform me, as opposed to just ignoring me and being done with it.
Having the vaccination wont mean that your daughter will be protected against cervical cancer.
Maybe in a year or two when there is more data available we will take the decision to have it done....both my children have had all of their vaccinations up till now, so im not against vaccinations.
I understand that but in this case i have put my trust in the medical profession who seem to think it will better my daughters chances of not getting it
The HPV Vaccine - is it a good idea ?
Reply With Quote
Re: The HPV Vaccine - is it a good idea ?
Originally Posted by tallskinnykiwi
This was successfully treated before it had the chance to develop into anything serious and some 10 years later, my recent smear test is completely clear.
