The Royal Bank of Scotland
Dear xx xxxxxxxxxx,
Re: Loan accounts. Reference numbers:
xxx Account No xxx
xxx Account No xxx
xxx Account No xxx
References:
A. My
Subject access request
(S.A.R - (Subject Access Request)) dated 7 January 2008.
B. Your xxx (Acknowledgement).
C. My xxx (Supply of additional information).
D. Your xxx(Supply of copies of statements).
E. Your xxx (Forwarded information to branch).
F. Your xxx (Duplicate statements for account
xxxxxxxx).
G. Your xxx (Duplicate statements for account
xxxxxxxx and request for more information).
H. xxx (Letter stating full disclosure as requested in
Reference A had not been received and concern over missing data).
I. Duplicate statements for account xxxx no letter attached.
J. Your xxx requesting dates, times, names and departments re telephone conversations.
K. My xxx requesting full details as required by my
Reference A including all records of all telephone conversations.
L. My xxx forwarding my xxx with attachments.
M. My xxx CCA request for loans.
N. Your letter with reference Your xxx enclosing information with regard to account xxx.
O. My xxx requesting further data.
P. Your letter with ref Your xxx stating you do not have the paperwork on two previous loans.
Q. My xxx my response to
Reference P.
I write in regard to the above
References
A-Q. Sadly
, The Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) have so far failed to comply fully with my DSAR in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998 (despite the correct procedures being followed and the correct fees being submitted) for the provision of all data applicable to myself and the three loan accounts. I have submitted a separate letter on this subject to the Data Protection Officer and
, indeed
, have lodged a formal complaint with the Information Commissioners Office. You have forwarded copies of the three Loan account statements, my current account statement and information as requested in
Reference M.
In each case PPI policies were attached to the above loans obtained from you on 8 March 2004, 20 May 2005 and 21 August 2006. I am now convinced that I was mis-sold these PPI policies for the following
7 reasons:
- Underwriting a Policy of Insurance: On each occasion when the details of a loan were discussed, Your sales advisors failed to check my personal circumstances at the time of the sale, which they are under obligation to do when underwiting a Policy of Insurance. If they had done so, they would have realised that the PPI policies were useless to me. At no time was any attempt made to ascertain if the product provided was fit for purpose, suitable for my needs or if indeed it was required at all.
- Alternative Insurance Cover: Your sales advisors did not ask me if I had any alternative arrangements for insurance cover. My employer has a generous illness package which would cover a period of sickness as follows: 6 months full pay followed by 6 months half pay. I would also be entitled to a generous redundancy
package and a substantial payment would be made in the event of my death in service (more than suffice to clear the balance of the loan).
- Significant Policy Exclusions: I was most definitely not informed that the PPI policies could contain certain exclusions which could affect me and my ability to claim on the policies if I should need to. Additionally I was never told that Pre Existing Medical Conditions could invalidate my policy and I was never asked if I had any Pre Existing Medical Conditions. Indeed your Loan Customer Duty of Care Checklist and the Loanguard Certificate of Insurance to which the Customer Duty of Care Checklist refers (forwarded under cover of Reference N) contain no reference to any Pre Existing Medical Conditions or includes any questions to me on the subject. I am in fact in receipt of a 40% War Disablement Pension from Her Majesty’s Government (HMG) since 1991. One element of this pension includes back injury which I now know is an exclusion in your PPI Policies. I also believe that I would also be excluded on at least one other existing condition.
- Widespread PPI Mis-Selling: I cancelled the PPI policy on xxx Account No xxx on 7 Jan 2007 after becoming aware of the widespread mis-selling of PPI by some financial institutions, following recent media coverage and recent OFT and FSA investigations regarding the mis-selling of PPI. I believe this is borne out by Point 3 above. I am also aware that the question of PPI cover is the subject of an ongoing inquiry by the Competition Commissioner.
- Wholly Inappropriate PPI Selling Bonuses: I understand that some employees are paid higher bonuses if they get prospective creditors to take out PPI with loans. How can the best interests of the customer possibly be met, if there is a clear conflict of interest
between your responsibilities to me, and the drive of your employees to sell Payment Protection Insurance whether it is suitable or not in order to receive bonuses?
- PPI Loan Interest Payments Miscalculated: Since I cancelled the policy, I have actually received a smaller reduction in the PPI loan interest payments than the figure stated on the agreement. The explanatory letter sent to me has, I believe, confirmed that I have paid for single premium PPI policies on each loan taken with your establishment.
- True Nature of Single Premium PPI Not Explained: No explanation was forthcoming from any advisor on any occasion on the full extent of single premium PPI policies, or the fact that they would offer little or no refund if the loan was settled early or if the insurance was cancelled. The statements you have forwarded on accounts xxx and xxx, show no element of any refund of PPI or PPI interest when the accounts were settled on refinancing. There was also no explanation that the cost of the PPI premium would be added to the total cost of credit and interest added for the full term of the agreement. I believe this practice is unlawful.
I now believe that the single premium PPI policies attached to the loan accounts were extremely unfair, totally unreasonable
and of very limited protection value. I am therefore requesting a full refund of all costs including all single PPI premiums that have been paid, the interest added to these premiums and the payments, that I have paid to date.
Furthermore,
as I believe I have been unlawfully deprived of this money
, I also expect the repayment of the interest at the Statutory Interest rate of 8% applicable to of each of the single premiums.
Details of the single premiums for each account with the interest payments made are as follows:
xxx Account No xxx
Insurance premium including interest on the premium = £6,109.32
Monthly interest payments made 8 April 2004 to 9 May 2005 £72.73 X 14 = £1,018.22
Sub Total £7127.54 Plus @ 8% Statutory Interest £570.20 =
Total sum £7,697.74
xxx Account No xxx
Insurance premium including interest on the premium = £7,534.90
Monthly interest payments made 20 June 2005 to 20 July 2006 £89.70 X 14 £1,255.80
Sub total £8,790.70 plus @ 8% Statutory Interest £703.25 =
Total sum £9,493.95
xxx Account No xxx
Insurance premium including interest on the premium = £8448.72 Less rebate on PPI premium £5,598.03 and rebate on PPI interest £1,552.78 (£7,150.81) = £1,297.91
Monthly interest payments made 20 September 2007 to 22 January 2007 £100.58 X 5 £502.90
Sub total £1,800.81 plus @ 8% Statutory Interest £144.06 =
Total sum £1,944.87
The total repayment figure I require is: £19,136.56
If I do not receive a favourable response to this letter, I will pursue my claim through the Financial Ombudsman Service (
fos
) and indeed the Courts if necessary.
In
Reference P paragraph 2 you stated
: “With regard to the two loans with DLFS this has been passed on to the relevant Department who will correspond directly with you
.“ I still await correspondence from that Department in relation to that information. Please expedite a reply from this Department at your earliest convenience.
Yours faithfully,
name