Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Do you think I should send the CCA request now then instead of waiting? I really can do without the stress. Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you for responding.
    • How was the "receiver" appointed and what is their role? Appointed by the lender under the terms of their security on the loan (sometimes referred to as "LPA Receiver")? Or are they acting for you in insolveny? What's the current role of the agent?
    • Wait for more replies, but that letter to me can be interpreted as a letter before action. Ignoring it can have consequences. The court to impose sanctions for failure in responding to a letter of claim.
    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Debt collection agency chasing me - whats my rights?


Linz192
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5005 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Ok so me and my partner have some debts to pay off and so went through our finances to decide what we could shave. One being the gym at £110 per month. I cancelled the direct debit then spoke to the gym in person to ask if we could take a 2 month break until our debts were cleared. She informed me i needed to give a months notice however i had already stopped payment and so decided to ignore there calls from there on. One month later i recieved a letter saying we owed them £110 and if we didn't pay our case would be passed on to a debt collection agency. I still decided to push my luck thinking i would call there bluff. Then on Friday i recieved a letter from this agency informing me i had 48hrs to pay or they may pass my case onto their solicitors. I have also noticed they have said i owe £132.00. I presume the extra £22 is there fee yet they haven't mentioned the charge. Now i don't understand why they didn't just pass my case straight on to the solicitors..is it because it may cost them money? If so are they really going to persue me for this measly £110. Surely they are taking a greater chance paying the court fees and in the case that i may not be able afford to pay anything. Of course i wouldn't let it get this far as i don't want to end up with a CCJ but they don't know this. So do i carry on to call there bluff and wait for the solicitors letter or shall i call today to sort this out? If they can send me proof of a signed contract by myself i am quite happy to pay but can they charge me for this information? And also can they add this £22 without informing me?

 

Many thanks!

Edited by Linz192
spelling
Link to post
Share on other sites

Firstly, you have every right to receive on request a copy of the agreement that you signed, if this agreement makes no mention of the £22 charge they have applied, then they have no right to apply the charge as it isn't part of the agreement that you entered into.

 

Gyms are notorious for pursuing lapsing members, request a copy of the agreement and look carefully in the terms and conditions to see if it mentions the application of charges.

 

if the charge has been applied by the DCA, then they are completely unlawful as you have entered no agreement with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right great thanks, i thought that they couldn't charge this £22 without informing me or for the cost of sending a letter. I presume too then that i don't have to pay for information e.g. a copy of the signed contract (except posting charges). I just wanted to be sure before i state my rights in the phone call i am about to make?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send a £1 postal order to cover admin fees.

Beating the DCA's day by day

 

My fight:

NDR - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Bank of Scotland - CCA'd 12+2 passed

CFS - Win by Technical Knock-out!:lol:

HFC Bank - CCA'd 12+2 passed

Chantry Collections - CCA sent

 

Time flies like an arrow

Fruit flies like a banana :D

 

<---------- Have I given you top advice, have I made you laugh, click on the scales, it won't hurt you! :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to update, i called this company and have been told i must pay £10 to recieve a copy of the contract. I told them my solicitor says that we have a right to see this information by law free of charge minus any postage charges. They then insisted under the credit consumer act they have a right to charge £10. Is this correct? Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

NO.....it isn't right...quote them this...

 

Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations

1983 (SI 1983/1569)

2 Prescribed period

The period of 12 working days is hereby prescribed for the purposes of each provision of the Act specified in Column 1

of the Schedule to these Regulations relating to the duty indicated in Column 2 in relation to regulated agreements

 

 

SCHEDULE

SECTIONS OF THE ACT IN RESPECT OF WHICH A PERIOD OF 12 WORKING DAYS IS PRESCRIBED RELATING TO DUTIES IN

RELATION TO REGULATED AGREEMENTS

Regulation 2

Section of the

Act

Duty

(1) (2)

77(1) Duty to give information to debtor under fixed-sum credit agreement.

78(1) Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement.

79(1) Duty to give information to hirer under consumer hire agreement.

and section 78 for running credit

 

 

78.

Duty to give information to debtor under running-account credit agreement.

— (1) The creditor under a regulated agreement for running-account credit, within the prescribed period after receiving a request in writing to that effect from the debtor and payment of a fee of [F1 £1], shall give the debtor a copy of the executed agreement (if any) and of any other document referred to in it, together with a statement signed by or on behalf of the creditor showing, according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer,—

(a)

the state of the account, and

 

(b)

the amount, if any currently payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor, and

 

©

the amounts and due dates of any payments which, if the debtor does not draw further on the account, will later become payable under the agreement by the debtor to the creditor.

 

 

(2) If the creditor possesses insufficient information to enable him to ascertain the amounts and dates mentioned in subsection (1)©, he shall be taken to comply with that paragraph if his statement under subsection (1) gives the basis on which, under the regulated agreement, they would fall to be ascertained.

 

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to—

(a)

an agreement under which no sum is, or will or may become, payable by the debtor, or

 

(b)

a request made less than one month after a previous request under that subsection relating to the same agreement was complied with.

 

 

(4) Where running-account credit is provided under a regulated agreement, the creditor shall give the debtor statements in the prescribed form, and with the prescribed contents—

(a)

showing according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer, the state of the account at regular intervals of not more than twelve months, and

 

(b)

where the agreement provides, in relation to specified periods, for the making of payments by the debtor, or the charging against him of interest or any other sum, showing according to the information to which it is practicable for him to refer the state of the account at the end of each of those periods during which there is any movement in the account.

 

 

(5) A statement under subsection (4) shall be given within the prescribed period after the end of the period to which the statement relates.

 

(6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)—

(a)

he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement; and

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to update..

I am starting to get nervous now and have no idea of the next step. I sent the letter off with a postal order for £1 last week. I have today recieved another letter from them totally ignoring my attempts.

The letter says...my records show that this debt has still not been satisfied and you may have chosen to ignor my attempts to assist you in resolving this matter. After further investigation my client has also confirmed that there are no outstanding issues or queries pending on your account. It is in your interest that you phone me today by telephone to discuss payment of this debt. Failure of which will result in us passing your account to Stenfield Solicitors for collection through court proceedings. Any additional court costs will be added to your debt. To avoid this payments must be made by card/chq/postal order within 48 hrs. All county court judgements are automatically registered in the register or cort judgements. If paid after 28 days the judgement is endorsed satisfied/paid but kept on record for 6 years.

 

OK whats the next step? I have checked with royal mail and the letter was delivered. They cant just slap on a CCJ without taking me to court can they?

Link to post
Share on other sites

They may try to take you to court and indeed some do, but a judge will only award a CCJ if it isn't defended or you lose the defence case.....but wait until you hear back in answer to your CCA request and keep us posted....when the 12+2 working days is up send them this by recorded...

 

Account In Dispute

 

Ref:

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Thank you for your letter of xx/xx/xx, the contents of which have been noted.

 

You have failed to respond to my legal request to supply me a true copy of the original Consumer Credit Agreement for the above account.

 

On **DATE** I made a formal request for a true signed agreement for the alleged account under consumer credit Act 1974 s77/8. A copy of which is enclosed for your perusal and ease of reference.

You have failed to comply with my request, and as such the account entered default on **DATE**.(12+2 days after you sent the CCA request)

 

The document that you are obliged to send me is a true copy of the executed agreement that contained all of the prescribed terms, all other required terms and statutory notices and was signed by both your company and myself as defined in section 61(1) of CCA 74 and subsequent Statutory Instruments. If the executed agreement contained any reference to any other document, you are also obliged to send me a copy of that document.In addition a full statement of this account should have been sent to me detailing all debits and credits to the account.

 

Furthermore

 

You are aware that the Consumer Credit Act allows 12 working days for a request for a true copy of a credit agreement to be carried out before your client enters into a default situation.

 

This limit has expired

 

As you are no doubt aware section 77(6) states:

 

If the creditor fails to comply with Subsection (1)

 

(a) He is not entitled , while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.

 

Therefore this account has become unenforceable at law.

 

As you have Failed to comply with a lawful request for a true, signed copy of the said agreement and other relevant documents mentioned in it, Failed to send a full statement of the account and Failed to provide any of the documentation requested.

 

Consequentially any legal action you pursue will be averred as both UNLAWFUL and VEXATIOUS.

 

Furthermore I shall counterclaim that any such action constitutes unlawful harassment.

 

Please note you may also consider this letter as a statutory notice under section 10 of the Data Protection Act to cease processing any data in relation to this account with immediate effect.

 

This means you must remove all information regarding this account from your own internal records and from my records with any credit reference agencies.

 

Should you refuse to comply, you must within 21 days provide me with a detailed breakdown of your reasoning behind continuing to process my data.

 

It is not sufficient to simply state that you have a ‘legal right’; You must outline your reasoning in this matter and state upon which legislation this reasoning depends.

 

Should you not respond within 14 days I expect that this means you agree to remove all such data.

 

Furthermore you should be aware that a creditor is not permitted to take ANY

Action against an account whilst it remains in dispute.

 

The lack of a credit agreement is a very clear dispute and as such the following applies.

 

* You may not demand any payment on the account, nor am I obliged to offer any payment to you.

* You may not add further interest or any charges to the account.

* You may not pass the account to a third party.

* You may not register any information in respect of the account with any credit reference agency.

* You may not issue a default notice related to the account.

 

 

I reserve the right to report your actions to any such regulatory authorities as I see fit.

You have 14 days from receiving this letter to contact me with your intentions to resolve this matter which is now a formal complaint.

 

I would appreciate your due diligence in this matter.

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is in your interest that you phone me today by telephone to discuss payment of this debt.

 

Is there any other way of phoning somebody without the use of a phone ? :)

 

Did they really say this or is it a typo ?

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you will find that gym agreements, like mobile phone contracts etc., do not fall within the realm of the Consumer Credit Act.

 

The £10 they are requesting is probably for a subject access request under the Data Protection Act 1998. This of course does cover your situation and you should automatically get a copy of the agreement with such a request.

I really do appreciate all those 'thank you' emails - I'm glad I've been able to help. Apologies if I haven't acknowledged all of them.

You can also ding my gong if you prefer. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh no really?! So what now shall i contact the gym and ask for a copy or contact this debt agency? I thought i was onto a winner. They have recieved my request and not replied telling me this information, will that make bare any reasoning on my part if it goes to the solicitor? I feel stupid now :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was a member of fitness first for some time a few years back and decided I didnt like it anymore and cancelled my direct debit.

 

They ranted on for some time with there threat letters before they must have got bored and gave up.

 

Im not saying this is what happens for everyone ... Just my personal experience.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thats what i thought, its only one gym and not a big chain, surely they arnt going to risk taking me to court and having to pay court fees on the chance that i can't pay! The court fees would possible be more than what i owed. My sister was a member at fitness first and she cancelled her DD, by saying theres a law that you only pay for you have used, but have since tried to google this and found nothing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regardless of whether the debt is covered by the CCA or not, you have raised a genuine query against the debt, you can prove this, they are not allowed any enforcement action whilst a debt is in dispute. If they do decide to take you to court, that should be the basis of any defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

i have a problem i had a letter come to my address off a debt collection agency telling me i owe £227 i made them a offer of £10 a month they accepted didnt ask me what money i was getting, then i get another letter off a different debt collector about another debt i owe whitch is £672 i phoned these up and told them that i could only afford £10 a month they said to me its got to be £12.00 a week because i was paying that to provident whats providents contract got to do with them so i set up a standing order to pay £5 a week not £12.00, a couple of weeks go by then they ring me saying that they cant accept £5 a week so where have they been for them 2 weeks i told them they are going to have to take the £5 a week and they said they dont have to take anything what should i do about it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi. Welcome to CAG.

 

I think it would be better to start your own thread. Click this link:

 

Debt Collection Industry - The Consumer Forums

 

Just down on the left is a new threaed button. Click on that and you can then start your own and I'll keep an eye out for you.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...