Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
I have decided to start a new thread as I have been getting more angry the more I think about what they (MBNA) have done. See earlier thread (Robin banks v Nat West & MBNA) basically they sent a copy of my original application (along with various other docs) in response to my S.A.R - (Subject access request) where I have quite clearly ticked No to PPI. So I have been paying for PPI that I did not want on a CC account opened in Nov 01, not only have I been paying the premiums but sometimes (when I have not repaid the full ammount) insurance aswell. I am livid and want to nail these edited obviously my primary concern is to get MY money back but would like to inflict some damage on MBNA in the process without jeopordising my claim.
I have searched the site for info and get the impression that I can not claim to have been mis sold, so would have to go down the fraud route which shifts the burden of proof to me. 1 thread with a similar scenario i.e. ticked No to PPI, had a counter claim that they were sold PPI at a later date over the phone. Does this mean they have to prove that they did not purchase PPI as claimed. Or does the company have to prove that the call took place.
I am a little confused and worried that my initial optimism on receiving the original application may turn sour.
I know it is temptingto go in with all guns blazing and to want to cause them some damage. However, it is probably counterproductive.
I think you first approach should be to send a copy of the agreement they sent you showing the PPI box unticked and a sample statement showing PPI being paid and ask them to rectify their mistake.
If they say that you cannot claim back anything over 6 years old, point out that s32 of the limitations act 1980 allows for remebdy of a mistake and that the limitation period is 6 years from when the mistake was discovered.
If they refuse to repay the charges, then you will need to send an lba and then go down the court route.
Steven
Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here
Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial
My Wins
GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007 NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007 BrighthouseWon unconditionally August 2007 GoldfishWon unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra) Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008
Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.
Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.
Please observe site rules and guidance on posting.
If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are/or could be seen to be inappropriate for posting on the main forum.Site rules explain this in more detail.If you are approached by private message with a view to asking you to visit another website,please inform the site team via the report icon. Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed. Donations help CAG to help YOU Click here
I, like you, get very angry the more I think about how these organisations behave and IMHO, I belive it is fraud!
BUT..... please follow the advice on here and follow the process for reclaiming. That way, when you do get your money back, the satisfaction will be that much greater and would not have caused yourself extra stress!
These companies will get there come uppance one day - just look at the amount of PPI claims now being won - this is going to snowball like the bank charges and hit them where it hurts - their profits! Yes, they will try to get there money back in other ways, but now they have a problem...
Steven4064's approach is dead right. I would be wary about alleging fraud. Proving intent will be onerous besides which, it wouldn't make you any richer than you would be if you showed you had made payment of the PPI premiums by mistake.
I take it the credit agreement in question is a running account and running right now and that you have never made a claim on the PPI. If so, I see no reason why PPI payments taken in mistake could not be applied to the credit of the running account.
Thanks for the replies folks and sorry to the mods for my small indiscretion, I was very angry yesterday. I have composed the below letter, is this OK or is there a more suitable letter on the site somewhere, I have looked but can't find one.
Re Account no XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
Enclosures
1) Copy of signed credit card application form.
2) Copy statement detailing PPI payment.
Dear XXXXXX
Thank you for your response to my Subject access request dated 27th August 2008. On reviewing the records you sent I notice that I have been paying Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) since opening the account in November 2001. I also note that on the copy of the original application I have declined the option of PPI by ticking the No box.
Due to an administrative error on your companies part I have unknowingly being paying for a product that I quite clearly did not want. I respectfully request that you correct this error by refunding all PPI payments plus interest your company has charged on these premiums to my account.
If I do not receive a satisfactory response within 10 working days I will be reporting this matter to the Financial Ombudsman Service and the Financial Services Authority.
I will also begin legal proceedings to reclaim the monies owed to me.
I persoanlly wouldn't bother with fos or FSA at this point - I would go straight to court. Also it is best to give 14 elapsed days as that fits with pre-action protocols (I know its the same thing). I suggest replacing last 2 paragraphs with
"If I do not receive a satisfactory response within 14 days I will send a letter before action giving a further 14 days for you to respond. If you do not respond positively to that, I will begin proceedings on the county court without further communication"
Steven
Using CAG Toolbar will generate much needed income - Download Here
Confused by Simple Interest? Confounded by Compound Interest? Read my Interest Tutorial
My Wins
GE Money Won unconditionally May 2007 NatWest Won unconditionally August 2007 BrighthouseWon unconditionally August 2007 GoldfishWon unconditionally April 2008 (including CI on the basis of Sempra) Clydesdale Financial Services (now BPF) Won unconditionally February 2008
Any opinions are without prejudice & without liability. Do not take any legal action on my advice alone. Almost everything I know concerning the law I learned from this site.
Please note, I will not give advice by PM. Please send a link to your thread and I will do my best to answer there.