Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.
The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights
a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.
Fizzbuzz v 1st Credit - in court this week to set aside SD**WON**
..............
As you will see below, I had put loads of stuff about my defence for a court date with 1st credit to set aside SD & then I read on another thread that they monitor this forum so I have now taken it all off - am I being paranoid or is this really a problem?
Re: Fizzbuzz v 1st Credit - in court this week to set aside SD
Unless you were posting something that would be a surprise to them, then there shouldn't be a problem.
Mask any personally identifiable stuff - account numbers, names, addresses, actual amounts.
Your most likely reason will be the lack of an enforceable CCA or an incorrect amount and they will already know that!
You could always put stuff back here for the day (will 1st credit look on a Sunday?) if you want advice on something different. You would get advised to remove it if there was something that sensitive.
Re: Fizzbuzz v 1st Credit - set aside SD - WON IN COURT
Hi, I have found this site VERY useful in putting together my responses to this Statutory Demand so I wanted to let people know that I have been to court today and the judge agreed there was sufficient reason to set aside the Statutory Demand that 1st credit had issued against me.
I was able to demonstrate that:
1st Credit had not complied with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 s127 (3)
1st Credit had not supplied a copy of an original signed credit agreement with prescribed terms & the documentation they had supplied (application form) was therefore unenforceable
1st Credit had not supplied a copy of the executed deed of assignment for the alleged debt and there was therefore no proof they were entitled to collect the debt
The amount of the alleged debt included a substantial sum of unlawful penalty charges and 1st Credit had not provided a statement of account as requested under s78 CCA 1974 so the amount of the debt was in dispute.
1st Credit has acted contrary to several sections of the OFT debt collection Guidelines in its methods of pursuing this debt
The Statutory Demand was not issued in accordance with the Insolvency practice directions CPR PD INSOLV 11.4
I provided much more detail and case law examples for these points where necessary.
1st Credit did not turn up.
I submitted costs and the judge agreed to £65 of costs. The judge was very pleasant and it only took 10 minutes.
Re: Fizzbuzz v 1st Credit - in court this week to set aside SD
Excellent result !!! well done Fizz...!! the next stage will be to pursue 1st credit's costs.....if they don't pay up, then take them to court.....and if you have to go to their offices with bailiffs, make sure you take some camera crews from your local BBC TV station, and the national press...
PLEASE NOTE - I am not a legal expert, what is stated is my own opinion and from what I have learnt from this forum and my own experiences.
IF WE HAVE BEEN HELPFUL -PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE GIVE A DONATION TO HELP US TO CONTINUE HELPING YOU
I AM HAPPY TO RECEIVE PM's AND I WILL RESPOND IF I FEEL I CAN ASSIST BUT WHEN YOU DO CAN YOU PLEASE PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD ON WHICH YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO COMMENT - THANK YOU
IMPORTANT - If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.
Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.
Private message facilities are offered for users to communicate issues that are/or could be seen to be inappropriate for posting on the main forum.Site rules explain this in more detail.
If you are approached by private message with a view to asking you to visit another website,please inform the site team via the report icon.
Re: Fizzbuzz v 1st Credit - in court this week to set aside SD
Thanks for all your replies. I'm not sure whether the judge could still rule in favour of the Stautory Demand as 1st credit didn't turn up. I suppose if I had no evidence to offer that the debt was in dispute etc, the judge could refuse to set aside the SD. I expect they're more likely to favour people who actually bother to turn up though!
The judge didn't say much about the whole thing, I think he found it a bit amusing actually & asked me if I was studying law!
I'll wait to see if 1st Credit pay my costs within the alloted time & then see what action I can take if not.
By the way, should I get this thread moved to the 'sucesses in court' folder? If so, how?
I offer help and advice in good faith, based on my knowledge and experience. I am NOT a legal or financial expert. There are many CAG members and site team who are better qualified. Please do not make major decisions based on my advice alone.I do not give advice via P.M's. If anyone can correct my mistakes or improve on my advice, please do.
Re: Fizzbuzz v 1st Credit - in court this week to set aside SD**WON**
HAK - I took to court my detailed arguement in support of my affidavit including examples of case law, claim for costs, copies of all letters to/from 1st credit etc. I did claim more for costs but the judge would only allow 5 hours litigant in person rate rather than what it actually took me. From what I had read on LITIGANT IN PERSON: COSTS - LITIGANTS IN PERSON I was not surprised that the judge put a cap on the amount of hours it was reasonable for me to have spent on this in the court's view but it's a shame as the hours I claimed was the time I spent dealing with this. I also claimed mileage and parking fees for attending court which were agreed.
Sleepless Nights - all that I did for dealing with this was to have a good look at the information available to me from these consumer forums, see how it applied to my own case and follow the court process carefully. Hopefully they won't turn up to your hearing either. I suspect it's expensive for them to do so. Good luck! I'm now waiting to see what they throw at me next.
Re: Fizzbuzz v 1st Credit - in court this week to set aside SD**WON**
Originally Posted by Sleepless Nights
Did you apply for your set aside while you were waiting for your CCA or did u wait until the time limit was up?
I applied for the set aside anyway as time was quite tight for getting it all back to court by the time I realised I really had to do something about it!