Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Notice of Commencement of CPR part 8 claim


larkshall
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3392 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I've been served with a cpr8 claim application for order of sale by Irwin Mitchell on behalf of natwest.

 

I dont understand any legal jargon at all being firmly of the belief that only shysters practice this dark art.

 

In Brief, this bunch have been persueing me for 2 years, firstly converting unsecured loan into secured and putting a charge on my home (sharp practice?).

 

The debt is for 12,742.72, which needless to say I cant pay, and they suggest paying 406 per month, some chance.

 

Today I find out a bunch called Face2Face have been to the house.

 

As I say I do not understand the 'law' but am probably guilty of ignoring and or not receiving court papers, nor defending myself.

I do however contest part of the value claimed, (some 4316 in bank charges etc), I have written to natwest regarding this (but only yesterday)

 

Help how do I get out of this mess

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok I'm afraid I don't know what a CPR 8 claim is, (have you received a previous CCJ for this) but all I know is that when you get an order for the civil courts you can make a CPR18 request for all information from the opposing solicitor so you can potentially fight a claim made against you on the following...

 

Non production of a Consumer Credit Agreement (which has to contain all the prescribed terms)

Non production of a valid default notice

You could also dispute the amount due to excessive charges too + 8% compounded interest....

 

You normally have to acknowledge a CCJ claim within 14 days on the date of the claim, then you get a further 14+3 days to submit a defence...

 

I'm hoping somebody can advise a bit more but this is what you should (i think) send to the opposing solicitor)...send recorded delivery

 

In the XXXX County Court

Claimant -v- (YOUR NAME)

Claim Number: (CLAIM NUMBER)

 

 

Dear XXX

 

CPR 18 REQUEST FOR INFORMATION

 

I have received a recent court claim from your organisation. In order to file a defence and counter claim I require some information. Given that this matter is now the subject of legal proceedings, you are obliged to disclose under the Civil Procedure Rules, the information and documents detailed below.

 

The information must be furnished within fourteen days of the receipt of this letter. If you fail to comply, this will be reported to the Court, a copy of this letter will be provided as evidence to the same and an Order enforcing your compliance will be sought.

 

1. A true copy of the executed credit agreement and any terms and conditions that applied to the account at the time of default and at the time the account was opened. True copies of any notice of assignment and/or default notice or enforcement notice that you or the original creditor sent me, with a copy of any proof of postage that you hold.

 

 

1.1 If copies of any of the above documents are to be relied on in court rather than originals, a copy of the Notice of proposal to adduce hearsay evidence required under s2(1) of the Civil Evidence Act 1995 together with proof of the authenticity of the document(s) as required under s8(1)(b) of the Act, including but not limited to:

 

(a) a copy of the procedure(s) used for copying, storing and retrieving documents

(b) a copy of the relevant log entry showing the time and date of the scan or copy, the name of the member of staff making the copy, the method used for copying, storage and retrieval and time and date of destruction of the original document(s)

© copies of internal and external audit reports covering the entire period from the date of the copy to the present to demonstrate that the procedures have been complied with

(d) copies of Quality Assurance accreditation certificates covering the entire period from the date of the copy to the present to demonstrate that the procedure(s) and audit process(es) comply with the appropriate quality standards

 

2. All records you hold on me relevant to this case, including but not limited to:

 

a. Transcriptions of all telephone conversations recorded and any notes made in relation to telephone conversations by your company, or by any previous creditor

b. Where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my account formerly held with *********.(AMEND TO THE COMPANY NAME)

c. .Documents relating to any insurance added to the account, including the insurance contract and terms and conditions, date it was added and deleted (if applicable).

d. Details of any collection charge added to the account; specifically, the date it was levied, the amount of the charge, a detailed financial breakdown of how the charge was calculated, and what the charge covers.

e. Specific details of the fees/charges levied by any other agency in respect of this account and a detailed breakdown of said fees/charges and what each charge relates to and on what date said fees/charges were levied.

f. A genuine copy of any notice of fair use of my data as required by the Data Protection Act 1998

g. A list of third party agencies to whom you have disclosed my personal data and a summary of the nature of the information you have disclosed.

h. Copies of statements for the entire duration of the credit agreement.

 

3. Any other documents you seek to rely on in court.

 

 

I will require this information within the next fourteen days. I must advise you that if the information is not forthcoming, it will be reported to the Court that you are trying to frustrate proceedings and denying me the opportunity to file a defence and counter claim.

 

Yours sincerely,

 

XXXX (type, don't sign).

 

 

As for face2face...send them this letter by recorded delivery...

 

Dear xxxx

 

Account Ref xxxx

 

Please be advised that I will only communicate with you in writing.

 

Furthermore, should it be your intention to arrange a “doorstep call”, please be advised that under OFT rules, you can only visit me at my home if you make an appointment and I have no wish to make an appointment with you.

 

There is only an implied license under English Common Law for people to be able to visit me on my property without express permission; the postman and people asking for directions etc (Armstrong v. Sheppard and Short Ltd [1959] 2 Q.B. per Lord Evershed M.R.). Therefore take note that I revoke license under Common Law for you, or your representatives to visit me at my property and if you do so, then you will be liable to damages for a tort of trespass and action will be taken, including but not limited to, police attendance.

 

Yours faithfully/sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just seen this on the net...

 

Types of claim in which Part 8 procedure may be followed 8.1 (1)The Part 8 procedure is the procedure set out in this Part.

(2)A claimant may use the Part 8 procedure where –

(a)he seeks the court’s decision on a question which is unlikely to involve a substantial dispute of fact; or

(b)paragraph (6) applies.

(3)The court may at any stage order the claim to continue as if the claimant had not used the Part 8 procedure and, if it does so, the court may give any directions it considers appropriate.

(4)Paragraph (2) does not apply if a practice direction provides that the Part 8 procedure may not be used in relation to the type of claim in question.

(5)Where the claimant uses the Part 8 procedure he may not obtain default judgment under Part 12.

(6)A rule or practice direction may, in relation to a specified type of proceedings –

(a)require or permit the use of the Part 8 procedure; and

(b)disapply or modify any of the rules set out in this Part as they apply to those proceedings.

 

(Rule 8.9 provides for other modifications to the general rules where the Part 8 procedure is being used)

 

top_icon.gif

 

Contents of the claim form 8.2 Where the claimant uses the Part 8 procedure the claim form must state –

(a)that this Part applies;

(b)(i)the question which the claimant wants the court to decide; or

(ii)the remedy which the claimant is seeking and the legal basis for the claim to that remedy;

©if the claim is being made under an enactment, what that enactment is;

(d)if the claimant is claiming in a representative capacity, what that capacity is; and

(e)if the defendant is sued in a representative capacity, what that capacity is.

(Part 22 provides for the claim form to be verified by a statement of truth)

 

(Rule 7.5 provides for service of the claim form)

 

(The costs practice direction sets out the information about a funding arrangement to be provided with the claim form where the claimant intends to seek to recover an additional liability)

 

(‘Funding arrangement’ and ‘additional liability’ are defined in rule 43.2)

 

top_icon.gif

 

Issue of claim form without naming defendants 8.2A (1)A practice direction may set out circumstances in which a claim form may be issued under this Part without naming a defendant.

(2)The practice direction may set out those cases in which an application for permission must be made by application notice before the claim form is issued.

(3)The application notice for permission –

(a)need not be served on any other person; and

(b)must be accompanied by a copy of the claim form that the applicant proposes to issue.

(4)Where the court gives permission it will give directions about the future management of the claim.

 

top_icon.gif

 

Acknowledgment of service 8.3 (1)The defendant must –

(a)file an acknowledgment of service in the relevant practice form not more than 14 days after service of the claim form; and

(b)serve the acknowledgment of service on the claimant and any other party.

(2)The acknowledgment of service must state –

(a)whether the defendant contests the claim; and

(b)if the defendant seeks a different remedy from that set out in the claim form, what that remedy is.

(3)The following rules of Part 10 (acknowledgment of service) apply –

(a)rule 10.3(2) (exceptions to the period for filing an acknowledgment of service); and

(b)rule 10.5 (contents of acknowledgment of service).

(4)Omitted

 

(The costs practice direction sets out the information about a funding arrangement to be provided with the acknowledgment of service where the defendant intends to seek to recover an additional liability)

 

(‘Funding arrangement’ and ‘additional liability’ are defined in rule 43.2)

 

top_icon.gif

 

Consequence of not filing an acknowledgment of service 8.4 (1)This rule applies where –

(a)the defendant has failed to file an acknowledgment of service; and

(b)the time period for doing so has expired.

(2)The defendant may attend the hearing of the claim but may not take part in the hearing unless the court gives permission.

 

top_icon.gif

 

Filing and serving written evidence 8.5 (1)The claimant must file any written evidence on which he intends to rely when he files his claim form.

(2)The claimant’s evidence must be served on the defendant with the claim form.

(3)A defendant who wishes to rely on written evidence must file it when he files his acknowledgment of service.

(4)If he does so, he must also, at the same time, serve a copy of his evidence on the other parties.

(5)The claimant may, within 14 days of service of the defendant’s evidence on him, file further written evidence in reply.

(6)If he does so, he must also, within the same time limit, serve a copy of his evidence on the other parties.

(7)The claimant may rely on the matters set out in his claim form as evidence under this rule if the claim form is verified by a statement of truth.

 

top_icon.gif

 

Evidence – general 8.6 (1)No written evidence may be relied on at the hearing of the claim unless –

(a)it has been served in accordance with rule 8.5; or

(b)the court gives permission.

(2)The court may require or permit a party to give oral evidence at the hearing.

(3)The court may give directions requiring the attendance for cross-examination (GL) of a witness who has given written evidence.

 

(Rule 32.1 contains a general power for the court to control evidence)

 

top_icon.gif

 

Part 20 claims 8.7 Where the Part 8 procedure is used, Part 20 (counterclaims and other additional claims) applies except that a party may not make a Part 20 claim (as defined by rule 20.2) without the court’s permission.

 

top_icon.gif

 

Procedure where defendant objects to use of the Part 8 procedure 8.8 (1)Where the defendant contends that the Part 8 procedure should not be used because –

(a)there is a substantial dispute of fact; and

(b)the use of the Part 8 procedure is not required or permitted by a rule or practice direction,

 

he must state his reasons when he files his acknowledgment of service.

(Rule 8.5 requires a defendant who wishes to rely on written evidence to file it when he files his acknowledgment of service)

(2)When the court receives the acknowledgment of service and any written evidence it will give directions as to the future management of the case.

(Rule 8.1(3) allows the court to make an order that the claim continue as if the claimant had not used the Part 8 procedure)

 

top_icon.gif

 

Modifications to the general rules 8.9 Where the Part 8 procedure is followed –

(a)provision is made in this Part for the matters which must be stated in the claim form and the defendant is not required to file a defence and therefore –

(i)Part 16 (statements of case) does not apply;

(ii)Part 15 (defence and reply) does not apply;

(iii)any time limit in these Rules which prevents the parties from taking a step before a defence is filed does not apply;

(iv)the requirement under rule 7.8 to serve on the defendant a form for defending the claim does not apply;

(b)the claimant may not obtain judgment by request on an admission and therefore –

(i)rules 14.4 to 14.7 do not apply; and

(ii)the requirement under rule 7.8 to serve on the defendant a form for admitting the claim does not apply; and

©the claim shall be treated as allocated to the multi-track and therefore Part 26 does not apply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My feeling is you need to object to a CPR 8 because there is a dispute due to charges....BUT if they have no Consumer Credit Agreement then the debt is unenforceable anyway....unfortunately you can either dispute the debt due to unenforeability of the agreements/non production of defaults OR you can dispute it due to excessive charges, anyway without having all the relevant paperwork to hand how can you decide what to do !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

CPR 8 is used for anything else owed apart from money.

 

My view is that they have commenced the claim under the wrong procedure.

 

I would ask for a directions hearing and ask that the matter be transferrerd to Part 7 procedure.

 

Then normal rules would apply, file defence, AQ and then trial.

 

Part 8 you dont actually need to file I defence I dont think, there is no normal 14/28 day rule.

 

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm, they appear to have the charge already on the property , so, they would be able to use part 8 if they are merely asking the court for an order , ordering the sale of the property AFAIK

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...
Hi,

 

I've been served with a cpr8 claim application for order of sale by Irwin Mitchell on behalf of natwest.

 

I dont understand any legal jargon at all being firmly of the belief that only shysters practice this dark art.

 

In Brief, this bunch have been persueing me for 2 years, firstly converting unsecured loan into secured and putting a charge on my home (sharp practice?).

 

The debt is for 12,742.72, which needless to say I cant pay, and they suggest paying 406 per month, some chance.

 

Today I find out a bunch called Face2Face have been to the house.

 

As I say I do not understand the 'law' but am probably guilty of ignoring and or not receiving court papers, nor defending myself.

I do however contest part of the value claimed, (some 4316 in bank charges etc), I have written to natwest regarding this (but only yesterday)

 

Help how do I get out of this mess

 

Hi Larkshall,

 

Could you send me a scanned copy of the CPR Part 8 claim sent to you by the bank ?

I know this kind of case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...