Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Should this to be take into court with him or should he send something in earlier?
    • This is the other sign  parking sign 1a.pdf
    • 4 means that they need to name and then tell the people who will be affected that there has been an application made, what the application relates to (specificially "whether it relates to the exercise of the court’s jurisdiction in relation to P’s property and affairs, or P’s personal welfare, or to both) and what this application contains (i.e what order they want made as a result of it) 5 just means that teh court think it is important that the relevant people are notified 7 means that the court need more information to make the application, hence they have then made the order of paragraph 1 which requires the applicant to do more - this means the court can't make a decision with the current information, and need more, hence paragraph one of the order is for the applicant to do more. paragraph 3 of the order gives you the ability to have it set aside, although if it was made in january you are very late. Were you notiifed of the application or not?    
    • These are the photos of the signs. At the entrance there is a 7h free sign. On some bays there is a permit sign.  Also their official website is misleading as it implies all parking is free.  I can't be certain of the exact parking bay I was in that day, and there was no PCN ticket on my car and no other evidence was provided.  parking sign 2.pdf
    • Hi, In my last post I mentioned I had received an email from SS who were asking me to hand over the keys to my mother’s flat so they could pass them to the Law firm who have been appointed court of protection to access, secure and insure my mother’s property.  Feeling this, all quickly getting out of my hands I emailed ss requesting proof of this. I HAVEN’T HEARD BACK FROM SS.  Yesterday, I received an email (with attached court of protection order) from the Law Firm confirming this was correct (please see below a copy of this).  After reading the court of protection order I do have some concerns about it:   (a)   I only found out yesterday, the Law firm had been appointed by the court back in January.  Up until now, I have not received any notification regarding this.  (b)   Section 2   - States I am estranged from my mother.  This is NOT CORRECT    The only reason I stepped back from my mother was to protect myself from the guy (groomer) who had befriended her & was very aggressive towards me & because of my mother’s dementia she had become aggressive also.  I constantly tried to warned SS about this guy's manipulative behaviour towards my mother and his increasing aggressiveness towards me (as mentioned in previous posts).  Each time I was ignored.  Instead, SS encouraged his involvement with my mother – including him in her care plans and mental health assessments.   I was literally pushed out because I feared him and my mother’s increasing aggression towards me. Up until I stepped back, I had always looked after my mother and since her admission to the care home, I visit regularly.   .(c)    Sections -  4, 5 and 7  I am struggling to understand these as I don’t have a legal background.  I was wondering if there is anyone who might be able to explain what they mean.  It’s been a horrendous situation where I had to walk away from my mother at her most vulnerable because of; ss (not helping), scammer and groomer. I have no legal background, nor experience in highly manipulative people or an understanding of how the SS system operates, finding myself isolated, scared and powerless to the point I haven’t collected my personal belongings and items for my mother’s room in the care home.  Sadly, the court has only had heard one version of this story SS’s, and based their decision on that. My mother’s situation and the experience I have gone through could happen to anyone who has a vulnerable parent.    If anyone any thoughts on this much appreciated.  Thank you. ______________________________________________________  (Below is the Court of Protection Order)  COURT OF PROTECTION                                                                                                                                                                                   No xxx  MENTAL CAPACITY ACT 2005 In the matter of Name xxx ORDER Made by  Depty District Judge At xxx Made on xxx Issued on 18 January 2024  WHEREAS  1.     xxx Solicitors, Address xxx  ("Applicant”) has applied for an order under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.  2.     The Court notes (my mother) is said to be estranged from all her three children and only one, (me) has been notified.  3.     (Me) was previously appointed as Atorney for Property and Affairs for (my mother).  The Exhibity NAJ at (date) refers to (me) and all replacement Attorneys are now officially standing down.  4.     Pursuant to Rule 9.10 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 and Practice Direction 9B the Applicant 2must seek to identify at least three persons who are likely to have an interest in being notified that an application has been issues.”  The children of (my mother), and any other appointed attorneys are likely to have an interest in the application, because of the nature of relationship to (my mother).  5.     The Court considers that the notification requirements are an important safeguard for the person in respect of whom an order is sought.  6.     The Court notes that it is said that the local authority no longer has access to (my mother’s) Property.  7.     Further information is required for the Court to determine the application.  IT IS ORDERED THAT  Within 28 days of the issue date this order, the Applicant shall file a form COP24 witness statement confirming that the other children of (my mother) and any replacement attorneys have been notified of the application and shall confirm their name, address, and date upon which those persons were notified.  If the Applicant wishes the Court to dispense with any further notification, they should file a COP9 and COP24 explaining, what steps (if any) have been taken to attempt notification and why notification should be dispensed with.   Pending the determination of the application to appoint a deputy for (my mother), the Applicant is authorised to take such steps as are proportionate and necessary to access, secure and insure the house and property of (my mother).   This order was made without a hearing and without notice.  Any person affected by this order may apply within 21 days of the date on which the order was served to have the order set aside or varied pursuant to Rule 13.4 of the Court of Protection Rules 2017 (“the Rules”).  Such application must be made on Form COP9 and in accordance with Part 10 Rules.              
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Voluntarily returning my car whilst still under finance to Welcome finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5329 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all, a quick question is it true that a car purchased from Welcome Car finance can be voluntarily returned either half way through the agreement or when half the finance is paid? I have no defaults with the company, it's just that i'm paying far to much for not a very good service! I only ask as someone mentioned it to me earlier but didn't get the full information I propbably need.

 

Thnks

 

G

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure so don't take what I say with too much thought however, I think this is correct

However, you would need to look at your finance forms. There is usually a section (atleast there was with mine) where you have a figure of where you can just hand the car back

 

It takes into account interest etc

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

If you still have your finance documents there should be a section givin you info on your right to terminate the agreement, it normally gives you the figure which needs to be paid, generally it is the half way stage. I used to work in admin of the motor trade and all of the finance docs I saw had this. I handed my car back half way through an agreement with 1st National Motor Finance and my brother has just done so with Black Horse.

 

Hope this helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any car purchased under Hire contract can be given back 1/2 way through its agreement it is to protect the consumer or the creditor depending on how you look at this. Basically the Credit Company can take the vehicle from you 1/2 way through your term if they believe that said vehcile is actually worth more than the outstanding balance this never happens, however the flip side is that you can return vehicle, as in most cases the O/S balance you owe is actually alot more than said vechicle's actual value and is your consumer right under the hire purchase agreement, as i'm led to believe.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I think its a section headed "Your rights to terminate this agreement" It should then give details of "blah blah if u have paid at least one half of this agreement you may return the vehicle and will have nothing more to pay providing it has been kept in good condition, blah blah"

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

YES.. if you have a normal Hire Purchase agreement, you can Voluntary Terminate your agreement.

 

You need to have paid half the TOTAL payable. i would say the best bet is to ring the finance company and ask them if you can VT your agreement.

 

There will be certain terms for the conditon of the vehicle ( ie MOT, service history) so you are best speaking to them.

 

I doubt the T+C's for the credit agreement will be on the back of the 1000+ check list, it might just be the T+C for the warranty?

Any and all comments made are my sole opinion. these do not in any way reflect the opinions of any other company ether associated with myself or others. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

we vt our car with welcome no defaults before paid half

some time after get a default notice no mention of vt

and then court papers from solicitor

have a look at our thread court order welcome fianance

buffy

Buffy x

 

Buffy v Halifax WON all charges refunded

Link to post
Share on other sites

as far as I know, and I'm 99% sure of this because I think we did this to one of our first cars on finance when we decided we wanted to change but didnt want the hassle of keeping the (at the time) current one, that it does >not

 

As long as you kept up with your payments, its something you're allowed to do and as far as the parties concerned, the agreement has been settled with no outstanding payment.

 

Someone will correct me if I am wrong though

Link to post
Share on other sites

you should also visit Car Credit Complaints They know welcome very well and can give you more details on how to VT correctly as its easy to get things dreadfully wrong with welcome and end up getting stitched for a big sum of money

Direct Auto Finance & DLC dispute ongoing.

Offer with confidentually agreement from DLC / DAF DECLINED :D

Please PM me if you have any cheap rate or 0800 number for DCA's to add to my list and also to my website

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there. Welcome Car Finance took my car yesterday (well a courrier took it to an auction house in Liverpool), all has gone well and happened reasonably quickly, I V.T'd the car 9 months early and i know i owe the payments up until the two year point, they told me to go to my Welcome office and set up an agreement to pay off the outstanding balance, what I would like to know is if they will then charge me interest again, bearing in mind that I have already been charged interest, also they have charged me an additional £270.00 for things that the RAC picked up on (ie a couple of scratches, small dint and a valet), but the courier told me he would be taking it direct to the auction and it would be sold as it stood, without any of the work which i am being charged for done to the car, is this allowed, what can i do?? Any help/advice would be much appreciated, Many Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Any car purchased under Hire contract can be given back 1/2 way through its agreement it is to protect the consumer or the creditor depending on how you look at this. Basically the Credit Company can take the vehicle from you 1/2 way through your term if they believe that said vehcile is actually worth more than the outstanding balance this never happens, however the flip side is that you can return vehicle, as in most cases the O/S balance you owe is actually alot more than said vechicle's actual value and is your consumer right under the hire purchase agreement, as i'm led to believe.

 

Actually they can't take the vehicle from you after you have paid 1/3, unless

 

1. You have missed payments and.

2. A court has authorised them to do so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually they can't take the vehicle from you after you have paid 1/3, unless

 

1. You have missed payments and.

2. A court has authorised them to do so.

 

We are discussing VT's here matey...:???:

 

Under a Hire Purchase agreement, you can voluntary Terminate your agreement at any time by

 

1) Paying half the TOTAL outstanding balance ( not taking into account Insurances and warrranty's)

 

2) Agreeing to be liable for the remaining payments up to thehalf way mark. - This means you will have to hand the car bck, but still pay the normal instalments up to the amount you are liable for otherwise you will end up defaulting on your agreement and getting a default on your credit rating..

 

 

the courier told me he would be taking it direct to the auction and it would be sold as it stood, without any of the work which i am being charged for done to the car, is this allowed

 

Short answer is yes...... You are being charged for the depreciation of the cars value due to the 'faults' with the car.

 

Say a car is wroth £5000.. there are £500 worth of 'faults; with it, you either pay them £500 and they get it fixed and sell it for £5000 or you pay the £500 and they sell it for £4500... total money recived for the car =£5000!

 

and yes... i do this for a living! :eek:

Any and all comments made are my sole opinion. these do not in any way reflect the opinions of any other company ether associated with myself or others. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hello All,

 

Nice reply Robuck.

 

My contract, in the Key Information section states:

 

'Termination: Your rights. You have a right to end this agreement. To do so, you should write to the person you make your payments to. They will then be entitled to the return of the goods and to half the total amount payable under this agreement, that is xxxxGBP. If you have already paid at least this amount plus any overdue instalements and have taken reasonable care of the goods, you will not have to pay any more.'

 

I have paid more than half, i.e the quoted figure. The car has been serviced and will be again next week. However, there is a dent in the driver's door as somebody went in the side of it but didnt bother to leave their details!!! My question is as I have paid half of the amount payable, if they took the car away I wouldnt owe them anything, but will they charge me for the damage to the door?

 

Any help would be great.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Under the terms of the agreement yes they have a right to charge you for the dent to the door.

 

When the vehicle is collected you need to be there when they look over, you will have to sign to say you agree with the condition of the vehicle.

 

 

Some companies will just send somone out to collect it without looking at it. others will go over it with a fine toothcomb. Depnds on how lucky you are really.

 

You would be best getting a quote from a local body shop (or two) this way, if you disagree with the cost of the repair ( IF they charge you) you can give them two other independant prices.

 

as i said before though, some companies may just agree to it and send somone out to collect it without checking it.

 

hope that helps.

Any and all comments made are my sole opinion. these do not in any way reflect the opinions of any other company ether associated with myself or others. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is a good point. If you make a note of any damage you think needs to be repaired ( for a guide, if there is a scratch on the car and you cant run your finger nail over it without the scratch stopping it, it is considered to be beyond general wear and tear).

 

Also by taking photos you can prove the damage or lack or it if the company queries any damage which you feel doesnt need to be repaired or wasnt there in the first place.. ( some collection companies can cause damage to the vehicle in transport).

Edited by robuck

Any and all comments made are my sole opinion. these do not in any way reflect the opinions of any other company ether associated with myself or others. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

We are planning to do a voluntary termination later this year, once we have reached 50% of the total amount payable under the agreement.

 

After the ridiculous interest rate we have been charged for the last few years (and the dodgy PPI policies on the previous cars we had on HP) we do not feel very inclined to spend a lot of money getting the vehicle into perfect condition before handing it back for them to sell at auction.

 

Will they really bother pursuing us for repair costs? Presumably they would have to do it via small claims court, so we have nothing much to lose by defending and hoping they discontinue proceedings. And I also assume this would now be outside the credit agreement and so they couldn't put anything on the credit file?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any costs of repairs to get the vehicle up to 'reasonable conditon for its age' will be added to any liability you may have ( which will include any remaining PPI ) and unless this is paid, it will show as a default on your credit file as you will have broken the terms and conditions of the agreement, by not fullfilling YOUR side of the Voluntary Termination.

 

As the VT rights form part of the original agreement they wouldnt have to pursue you through the small claims court.

 

Again, it depends on whether the company will bother inspecting it, some do, some dont.

Any and all comments made are my sole opinion. these do not in any way reflect the opinions of any other company ether associated with myself or others. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I vtd my car about 5 months ago but after paying more than half for it ,i still had a bill for 1200 pounds for GAP and warranty i agreed to pay 100 pounds a month [the guy from welcome phones me on the beginning of the month and i pay by debit card] but do i have to pay GAP and the warranty now i have vtd the car officially..it has been the worst car i have ever owned only done 4000 mile in 2 and a half years ,,the car is still in my drive with the clutch gone! i told welcome and they said that comes under wear and tear ???

any help please

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your liability wont be for the GAP ( this is normally the 2nd payment on a HP ) the remaining liability will be the Warranty payments and any PPI if you had it.

 

as for warranty, unless its a fault ( ie sometings breaks and its not supposed to) it will be classes as normal wear and tear, especially friction parts, Clutch, Belts, Brakes.

Any and all comments made are my sole opinion. these do not in any way reflect the opinions of any other company ether associated with myself or others. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

as for warranty, unless its a fault ( ie sometings breaks and its not supposed to) it will be classes as normal wear and tear, especially friction parts, Clutch, Belts, Brakes.

 

You forgot some warranty wear and tear items robuck, there is also - gearbox, engine and components, heater blower, water leaks, radio not working, spare wheel missing, in fact in warranty terms, I can't think of anything that isn't wear and tear. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You forgot some warranty wear and tear items robuck, there is also - gearbox, engine and components, heater blower, water leaks, radio not working, spare wheel missing, in fact in warranty terms, I can't think of anything that isn't wear and tear. :)

 

 

to be honest, its ANYTHING that wears or tears, which on a car..... is everything LOL :-o

Any and all comments made are my sole opinion. these do not in any way reflect the opinions of any other company ether associated with myself or others. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...