Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
    • The US competition watchdog has taken legal action to stop Tapestry's $8.5bn takeover of rival Capri.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

NCF355 v CitiCards


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6443 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

well I've started the ball rolling

 

Wrote with my SAR - (Subject Access Request) letter to Citi Cards (C1 and Citi - two accounts - mine and mrs ncf) just before I went on holiday (just over a week ago - 29/06) and have had the following response:

 

Citi - 'Fill out enclosed form and provide ID' :evil: (duly done)

 

So it's started (I have many,many others to pursue but going for these first as they have smaller current balances - safety measure in case they start closing accounts on me!:evil: )

 

I'll keep you all posted

 

Thanks to everyone here for a great site

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck i've just been offered half back so they are going to pay up.Let us know how you get on.

cheers

andyace

 

 

citicards= £650/settled £650

Alliance and Leicester= £1534/request for payment sent/LBA sent/standard refusal/moneyclaimsent/settled £2003.36

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent my SAR on the 30th June, just got a recorded delivery letter asking for ID etc. Better send that of today.

 

Good luck with you claim?

 

How long are we talking before the claim is resolved? Does anyone have a rought idea?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well,

 

had the copy statements through.

 

Charges =

 

Me - £490

Mrs NCF - £100

 

 

Lovely!

 

Now for the next step

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Update:

 

reply to Mrs NCF's prelim : 'i appreciate this is not the result you would have hoped for,bla,bla' received 26/07 having sent prelim 22/7:x

 

LBA is currently winging its way to them:D

 

Still awaiting reply to my prelim:x

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well,

 

no reply to my prelim letter (though as you will se above we had the standard foxtrot oscar reply to mrs ncf's that was sent at the same time!)

 

So I have just sent off my LBA to the lovely people at Citi

 

Also just found out I can send recorded mail from work, so thats handy!

 

:D

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

just had a letter from 'Brian Smith: Solicitor' (who aks on behalf of CitiFinancial, and they have such a close relationship he uses their headed paper rather than that of a solictor practice)

 

He kindly pointed out that Citi have in fact charged me £515, not the £490 I calculated (earning his crust well then:D )

 

Then he goes on to offer me the diff between what I was charged and £12 charges (how kind)

 

Also says the case will be 'vigorously defended' if I proceed and they will press for the case to be heard in Salford (surprise!)

 

 

They state they are refunding the partial £251 to my account

 

 

So, how do I go about saying to him I'm not accepting?

 

 

Cheers all!

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can send you a copy of the letter I wrote if you like,it worked for me. You could adapt it for your situation.

cheers

andyace

 

 

citicards= £650/settled £650

Alliance and Leicester= £1534/request for payment sent/LBA sent/standard refusal/moneyclaimsent/settled £2003.36

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am watching your posts with interest as I am about to start money claim and I am considering including cash advance handling fees as well as I think I can use the 1999 UTCCR against them??? Good luck keep us posted.

First Direct - Settled in full :eek:

Lloyds TSB - AQ completed Central London CC :confused:

RBS - Settled in full :p

Morgan Stanley - Settled in full :lol:

Capital One - Settled in full ;-)

Citi Cards - Transfered to Mercantile Court 19/10/06

Nationwide - Settled in full 8)

Capital One Acct 2 - Prelim letter

Link to post
Share on other sites

Andy - YHM!

 

 

CG - Thanks for the wishes, all the best to you 2!

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

sent you a PM let me know what you think

cheers

andyace

 

 

citicards= £650/settled £650

Alliance and Leicester= £1534/request for payment sent/LBA sent/standard refusal/moneyclaimsent/settled £2003.36

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well,

 

I've written stating I wont accept their paltry offer

 

Interestingly they didnt make any such offer to my wife, just telling her (in 'flubber') that she wouldnt be getting a penny

 

This really p's me off, if they are going to apply this pathetic 'refund the difference between the £XX and £12' policy then it damn well ought to be across the board

 

I believe that this in itself would screw them in court

 

:-x

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I am also at the stage where they have credited mya ccount by the difference of the £25 and the £12 but not surewether to take further or not. Please could you email me a letter that you sent, did you not have to go through moneyclaim or not?

 

I am only claiming £600 and have been crdited £302 today

 

I thansk you all in advance my email is [email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

MODS: PLEASE EDIT TO REMOVE THE EMAIL ADDRESS!

 

 

Hi,

 

I've sent you an email with the details of the letter I sent, for which credit goes to AndyAce

 

Dont put your email address in the posts, if you want someone toemail you, PM them and include the email addy in that.:)

 

This is for your own safety as a) the banks are watching and b) your email could be harvested for email marketing !:rolleyes:

 

Hope the mail helps

 

NcF

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

I forgot to say check your balance in a few days because they credited the money to my account without notice, no letter explaining why. So you might have the money without knowing it. They even sent me a cheque for the 46 pence I was in credit!

CitiCard actually giving me money, thats something you don't see every day.

cheers

andyace

 

 

citicards= £650/settled £650

Alliance and Leicester= £1534/request for payment sent/LBA sent/standard refusal/moneyclaimsent/settled £2003.36

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ncf355,

 

Have you had a reply from Brian Smith???

I got a really snotty response from. Have a look at Citi’s Threat.

 

Best of Luck with your claim,

 

Hondamad :D

__________________

EGG CC Default Removal: Have reported Egg to Trading Standards, Summery Claim - 2nd Hearing Date 09/10/07. Click here to read posts

Monument CC: received statements, now need to send letters. . . !

BoS Current Account: Settled

Citi Cards: Hhmm seems like I have sued the wrong “entity”. Aaaaahhhhh . . .. oh well back to court I go, and they have settled in full!!!

 

:-D:p:D

This is just advice from me. If you are not sure please seek legal advice. However if what I have said has been helpful, than please add to my reputation by clicking on the scales :D

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any result on this one lets hope its a success story.

cheers

andyace

 

 

citicards= £650/settled £650

Alliance and Leicester= £1534/request for payment sent/LBA sent/standard refusal/moneyclaimsent/settled £2003.36

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope,

 

had a letter from Claire Morrison saying they acknowledge my letter in response to their offer of £156 (I was actually offered £251 by Brian Smith - they cant even get that right!:rolleyes: )

 

Re iterated how they will get the court to allow them to trial in Salford as it was the defendants right:-x

 

So I wrote giving them a further 7 days to settle before I raise the claim and also stated how I find it somwhat unlikely a judge would make the location in their favour due to me being an individual and them being a multi national with massive resources available

 

I'll be posting this 1st class recorded Tuesday AM so if I dont have the full refund by the following wednesday its MCOL here I come:cool:

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

 

Well, I have had Citi's defence through for mrs ncf's case

 

They have now credited the difference between £12 and what they charged to her account, considering they flatly refused to issue ANY refund in their letter prior to the court action I'm sure that will go down well with the judge

 

Despite the fact they have received 2 copies of the charges list they state in the defence that we have no provided a true breakdown of the costs!

 

'The defendant avers that the Particulars of claim do not particularise either the amount of the claim or the dates upon which the amounts claimed arose and puts the claimant to strict proof of the amount of her claim'

 

(after this,in the next para they state the amount charged was £100 which is the same as in my claim so theyve already answered what they wanted us to prove!)

 

As expected Northampton have transferred the case to MY local court (take note people that are afraid of Mr Smiths threat to get it sent to Salford - this will NEVER happen - unless YOU happen to live in Salford)

 

So Citi's solictors will get a nice little daytrip to the seaside (which of course they wont because they wont go to court)

 

So now I just have to sort out the AQ

 

:cool:

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Giz,

 

I notice your from my neck of the woods!

 

:D

omnia praesumuntur legitime facta donec probetur in contrarium

 

 

Please note: I am not a member of the legal profession, all advice given is purely my opinion, if in doubt consult a professional

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...