Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Oil and gold prices have jumped, while shares have fallen.View the full article
    • Thank you for your reply, DX! I was not under the impression that paying it off would remove it from my file. My file is already trashed so it would make very little difference to any credit score. I am not certain if I can claim compensation for a damaged credit score though. Or for them reporting incorrect information for over 10 years? The original debt has been reported since 2013 as an EE debt even though they had sold it in 2014. It appears to be a breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 Section 13 and this all should have come to a head when I paid the £69 in September 2022, or so I thought. The £69 was in addition to the original outstanding balance and not sent to a DCA. Even if I had paid the full balance demanded by the DCA back in 2014 then the £69 would still have been outstanding with EE. If it turns out I have no claim then so be it. Sometimes there's not always a claim if there's blame. The CRA's will not give any reason for not removing it. They simply say it is not their information and refer me to EE. More to the point EE had my updated details since 2022 yet failed to contact me. I have been present on the electoral roll since 2012 so was traceable and I think EE have been negligent in reporting an account as in payment arrangement when in fact it had been sold to a DCA. In my mind what should have happened was the account should have been defaulted before it was closed and sold to the DCA who would then have made a new entry on my credit file with the correct details. However, a further £69 of charges were applied AFTER it was sent to the DCA and it was left open on EE systems. The account was then being reported twice. Once with EE as open with a payment arrangement for the £69 balance which has continued since 2013 and once with the DCA who reported it as defaulted in 2014 and it subsequently dropped off and was written off by the DCA, LOWELL in 2021. I am quite happy for EE to place a closed account on my credit file, marked as satisfied. However, it is clear to me that them reporting an open account with payment arrangement when the balance is £0 and the original debt has been written off is incorrect? Am I wrong?
    • OMG! I Know! .... someone here with a chance to sue Highview for breach of GDPR with a very good chance of winning, I was excited reading it especially after all the work put in by site members and thinking he could hammer them for £££'s and then, the OP disappeared half way through. Although you never know the reason so all I can say is I hope the OP is alive and well regardless. I'd relish the chance to do them for that if they breached my GDPR.
    • The streaming giant also said it added 9.3 million subscribers in the first three months of the year.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

councill tax and direct debit problems,..now bailiffs.help!


Guest malissa7999
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5722 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest malissa7999

hi,

 

in 2007 i was paying a dd for council tax, i cancelled it in december 2007 cos i didnt want bank charges, i cancelled other dd's and set them up again no probs,... i have been trying since the beginning of this year to reinstate my dd with the council tax, they keep writing to me telling me that m bank has told them i have cancelled it,...by bank tell me its the councill's fault and they are trying to submit using the same mandate number:confused:.. the bank are now going to write me a supporting letter to prove that no direct debit has ever been set up successfully, since the original direct debit was cancelled in dec 2007,..

 

i owe £180.. from a liability order from a prvious years council tax, the council originaly gave this to rossendales, then when i set up my dd in 2007 they took the debt back,.... now as a result of the dd fiasco, they have given the debt back to rossendales,..without even writing to me telling me this is what they intended to do.

 

i also owe £699 for this current years,... i called them telling the council that i have now set up a standing order with my bank, for £20 per week,..they have written to me today saying this is insufficient!! they want me to pay £114 every month...which i can not afford, i do go to work, but i am a single parent,

 

the £180, i had a letter from rossendales stateing they will accept £90, then the rest in instalments,.. i wrote them a letter saying i could only afford £30 a month, and included a cheque for £30,..i have not contacted the bailiff at all, as i have had previous bad experiences with rossendales bailiffs, and do not want to go there again...i have not yet recieved any reply.

 

can some one tell me what i can do, i am so scared, and the council talk to me like i am rubbish, the manager even told me its my problem, and i should pay all the arrears, then put the phone down on me!..ihave sent a complaint, but i really need to sort out my payments...

 

before the council can allocate a debt to the nailiffs does it have to go to court first???..if so i think i will stand a good chance cos i have lots of proof that i have tried to set up a dd, and the bank will support me whenit says i have not cancelled it,despite what the council say...

 

this is a letter they have sent me today, refusing my £20 payments...i just want some advice of what to do next..

 

thanks

 

 

img006-2.jpg

 

 

ALSO THERE LETRER SAYS 'AS YOU ARE AWARE'...THEY REFFERED THE DEBT TO ROSENDALES,.... THAT IS UTTERLY A LIE,... I HAVE NEVER BEEN AWARE THAT THEY WERE RE-ALLOCATING THIS DEBT BACK TO ROSSENDALES,..THEY HAVE NEVER WRITTEN TO ME ADVISING ME OF THIS, NOT HAVE THEY EVER MENTIONED THIS ON THE PHONE WHEN I REPATEDLY KEPT SETTING BACK UP THE DD.... WHAT A LOAD OF LIARS THEY ARE !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

My council donth the exact same thing to me, i was with HSBC and the mandate was set up and my council failed to take their money, i had 3 cover letters from HSBC providing full evidence of my direct debit being live. when i went to court the magistrates did not want to know, they said that those letters are personel and are nothing to do with the case, that its a matter for me to take up with my bank as the council had a letter saying that as far as their computers state, i cancelled my direct debit, the are all the same and they pis an the same pot....

 

have you ever seen little britain, "computer says NO"

 

its a farse, its corrupt and what are you gunna do about it? NOTHING

 

because youu carnt, your vulnerable as your not the LAW but the council are... coruption is amoung us.

 

all the best "SPINTER" :!:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest malissa7999

hi,

 

i have just read this off a website >>>>

 

Council Tax

Sourced from: Regulation 45(2) of the Council Tax (Administration and Enforcement) Regulations 1992

For each liability order where no levy is made, £20 for the first or only visit and £15 for a second visit can be charged.

For levying distress, the following fees may be charged (or a lesser amount if that would be reasonable)

Note: The law does not provide for bailiffs to charge a letter fee.

Where the sum due is £100 or less

£20

For the next £400

4%

For the next £1,500

2.5%

For the next £1,500

2.5%

For the next £8,000

1%

For any additional sum

0.25%

Charges:

Walking possession fee. See Note

A flat rate of £10.

Attendance with vehicle/removal/storage

Reasonable costs See Note

Valuation

Reasonable costs, but no charge can be made unless the debtor has been advised beforehand of the charge and how it is calculated.

Sale of goods

Up to 15% of the proceeds of sale if the sale is held on auctioneer’s premises plus reasonable out-of-pocket expenses and reasonable advertising costs. Where the sale is held on the debtor’s premises, up to 7.5% of the proceeds of sale, plus reasonable costs. Where sale does not take place £20 or actual costs up to 5% of the amount of the liability order (whichever is the larger sum).

 

 

 

what doea it mean, when it says for eachliability where no levy is made???..

and then ..for levying distress the following fees may apply??

what is the difference??

i just found out today that the bailiff hasadded £24.50 to my account for posting a letter through my letter box,..which he calls a 'visit' charge....is this correct..or should he have only added £20?...i dont understand the difference between the two???...please help

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im not too sure, but i am having the exact same problems at the moment, do not contact the Bailiff and do not let him in what so ever....

 

QUESTIONS :?:

 

1) Do you intend to pay your debt owed? (not to the Bailif bu to the council)

2) Have You Contacted Your Bailiff, I Not DONT... Always best to ignore.

3) how long ago was it that you had your letter of the bailiff...

 

Im curently in the same boat am not going to pay the bailiff... i do not agree with their chargesc for one, im trying to get arrears passed back to the council as i can pay them minus the bailiff charges..

 

let me know your intentions and then i can help you and give you template letters to sent to your council....

 

,ake sure you always deal with all your corrispodence in writing, no telephone calls, you want everything in writing, as any mistakes cockups or wrog doings can be proven in writing, but telephone calls are hearsay... always be polite even when they are not, by being awkward or to the point they will just take you for the long ride, where as you want results, but never exept the blame. try your best to make a list of your right doings and their wrong doings, then you have a case... you will need amunition and the only ammunition that works is when you find a illeagle fault on their behalf....

 

Regards,

SPINSTER :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest malissa7999

hi,

 

i owe about £180.56 from a previous financial years tax, originaly the council obtained a summons aginst me, and it was passed to rossendales for collection, then due to the bad behaviour of the bailiffs and complaining the council took back the debt,..which i was paying by dd untill i cancelled it in dec 2007 cos of bank charges,..since then i have had a nightmare with the council to reinstate the dd,...and without any further warning my account was passed to rossendales...

 

i have read about the regulation that the council is to provide no less than 14 days if they intend on levying distress... im just not sure if they only have to do this the first time, ..or if each and everytime they reffer it to a bailiff they have to follow the regulation??

if they do, then they havent,..and i will pull them up about this.

 

the second thing is that the bailiff has never entered my property nor do i intend on letting the swines in!!

he has only ever posted a letter through my door,..he tells me that the charge for the 1st visit he has added to my account is £24.50.... but when reading about the charges,..he should have only charged me £20..because no levy was made!!..and he would have defrauded me.... but thats where i need to be !00% sure what is the difference between visit with a levy and visit without a levy????? if anyone knows i would be ever so gratefull so that it clears my own mind..

 

if i do find out that he has added an incorrect fee im thinking about paying it and then claiming it back as i was defrauded ito paying an incorrect bailiffs fee.. see the link below,..i found it on another post of this site.. if anyone has had any experience in doing this i would be gratefull if you would share and advice/tips..

 

i did telephon ethe bailiff once...which was to ask him what charges has he added to my account..has he hadnt left any notice of his charges,..again this is in breach of the NSEA...

 

he was trying to gain my trust speaking all kindly and softly,..calling me love (sexual harrassment maybe??:rolleyes:).. saying he will come to my house with the neccessary paper work,..i told him no thanks,..he then said the next thing he will do is send me a final demand,..then he will arrive with a van?????then i will face huge charges!!...this i think he cannot do as he does not have any walking posseion..so i dont think he can charge me these fee's.. again anyones advice on this will be gratefully appreciated!

 

thanks

malissa:-)

 

 

GETTING YOUR DEBT PAID OFF AT THE BAILIFFS EXPENSE - HOW TO SCREW A BAILIFF!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...