************************* *******************
Nothing in this post constitutes "advice" which I may not, in any event, be qualified to provide.
The only interpretation permitted on this post (or any others I may have made) is that this is what I would personally consider doing in the circumstances discussed. Each and every reader of this post or any other I may have made must take responsibility for forming their own view and making their own decision.
I receive an unwieldy number of private messages. I am happy to respond to messages posted on open forum but am unable to respond to private messages, seeking advice, when the substance of that message should properly be on the open forum.
Many thanks for your assistance and understanding on this.
Discount after Adjudication?
. The LA's response is to reject this and included in their reply their own basis by which they maintain that the contravention occurred.They further went on to say that in the event of the Adjudicator dismissing any Appeal I might make, they will still allow the 50% discount.This appears unusual to me and seems they are wanting me to Appeal as I would have nothing to loose from not paying the discounted rate now.What are their tactics in this? Are they trying to get a precedent or ruling set? (Regrettbly I am far from home and this their letter has only been read out to me by telephone, so I cannot quote verbatim at present)
Reply With Quote