Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • No, do the section 75 chargeback to your credit card provider.
    • See what dx thinks but it seems to me that sending a photo of your own pass isn't relevant to what happened. Let's wait and see what he says. HB
    • 1st letter image.pdf1st letter 2nd page.pdf
    • Many thanks for the replies and advice!   I what to send this email to the Starbucks CEO and the area manager. Your thoughts would be appreciated.   [email protected] [email protected]   Re: MET Parking PNC at your Starbucks Southgate site   Dear Ms Rayner, / Dear Heather Christie,   I have received a Notice to Keeper regarding a Parking Charge Notice of £100 for the driver parking in the Southgate Park Car Park, otherwise infamously known as the Stanstead Starbucks/McDonalds car park(s).   Issued by: MET Parking Services Ltd Parking Charge Notice Number: XXXXXXXXX Vehicle Registration Number: XXXX XXX Date of Contravention: XX.XX.XXXX Time: XX:XX - XX:XX   After a little research it apears that the driver is not alone in being caught in what is commonly described as a scam, and has featured in the national press and on the mainstream television.   It is a shame that the reputation of Starbucks is being tarnished by this, with your customers leaving the lowest possible reviews on Trustpilot and Trip Advisor at this location, and to be associated with what on the face of it appears to be a doubious and predatory car park management company.   In this instance, during the early hours of the morning the driver required a coffee and parked up outside Starbucks with the intention of purchasing one from yourselves. Unfortunately, you were closed so the driver walked to McDonalds next door and ordered a coffee, and for this I have received the Notice to Keeper.   It is claimed that the car park is two separate car parks (Starbucks/McDonalds). However, there is no barrier or road markings to identity a boundary, and the signage in the car park(s) and outside your property is ambiguous, as such the terms would most likely be deemed unfair and unenforcable under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   I understand that Starbucks-Euro Garages neither operate or benefit from the charges imposed by MET Parking. However, MET Parking is your client.   Additionally, I understand that the charge amount of £100 had previously been upheld in court due to a ‘legitimate interest in making sure that a car park was run as efficiently as possible to benefit other drivers as well as the local stores, keeping cars from overstaying’.   However, this is not applicable when the shop or store is closed (as was the case here), as there is no legitimate interest. Therefore, the amount demanded is a penalty and is punitive, again contravening the Consumer Rights Act 2015.   As the driver’s intention of the visit was genuine, I would be grateful if you could please instruct your client to cancel this Notice to Keeper/Parking Charge Notice.   Kind regards
    • I received the promised call back from the Saga man today who informed me that the undertakers have decreed it IS a modification and they will need to recalculate a quote individually for me. However it all sounds very arbitrary. The more I think about it, and with help from forum replies, the more I am sure that it is not a modification. If for example the original seatback had become damaged by a spillage or a tear, I would be entitled to replace it with the nearest available part. The problem is when it comes to a payout after an accident, there is no telling what an individual insurer will decide when he notices the change. I am still undecided which of the two best routes to go with, either don't mention the replacement at all, or fill in the quote form without mentioning, and when it comes to buying the insurance over the phone, mention it at the time.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Joint Account-Can my friend close/freeze it?


bankhater10
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5584 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

My friend has recently got divorced and currently has a joint account at the Nationwide, unfortunatley his ex-wife regularly empties the account so it goes over their overdraft limit and he ends up paying the charges, she doesn't earn and he does and he is getting depressed and distressed at this situation. He has tried to close the account but staff at his Nationwide account tell him this is not allowed, what can he do please?

Ps- i thought i read once that it is possible to freeze a joint account but not close it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this has been asked already on the forum tonight, but I will answer. He can ask that the account is frozen due to a marital dispute. Is the account in credit or debit?

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because I assume his ex wife won't sign anything for the account to be closed so clearing the overdraft and having the account frozen will do the job to get the account on lock down forever until such an agreement is reached.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the account is joint then he should be able to close it. You mention charges therefore I assume it is a flex account, you cannot have a flex account which is either to sign.

 

I suppose technically you are supposed to return both cards and chequebooks etc.

 

In answer to your question yes he can put the account in dispute, I forget the exact term as I no longer work for Nwide but essentially the account would be frozen.

 

I would suggest doing this in the branch and pointing out to the manager that the staff were IMO negligent in not informing him of this (assuming he's been in and asked about this).

 

He'll need to make alternative banking arrangements as the dispute thing can't be removed unless both parties sign something (which doesn't seem likeky from what you have said).

 

Get him to put this in place ASAP, it solves the immediate problem, however I would certainly question the information he's been given re closing the account.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, that advice is great, thankyou!! Please can i ask what 'IMO' is? Ps- i believe my friend rang Nationwide national number today (not local branch) and the lady on the other end assured him that she could cancel his overdraft with only his authorisation so i believe he has done that for now!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

IMHO = In My Honest Opinion

 

I'm glad to be able to help, please feel free to click on the scales of justice, these seem to have grown neglected by users in recent times :(

 

Now back to the matter at hand, now that your friend has done the thing I can't remember the name of my understanding is that nothing can happen to the account unless both parties come to some agreement. This doesn't seem likely from what you have said but at least it brings an end to the situation.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi,

I had a similar issue happen to me whereby our relationship has ended and I need to close our joint account. I have tried going into the branch but was told that the only option was for my ex to cut up her card and send it into a branch, which is not possible with the current situation.

 

Any advice as to how I get the account frozen/closed?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It seems you can go in with ID and ask for it to be closed.

 

Stand firm and if the bank so no ask them to sign to confirm you have been in and asked for them to close the account, and that they know you no longer want to be on the account, and that the other person is now to pay all charges on that account. This should make them remember you can close it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe they ARE supposed to have both cards returned but in this situation it is not possible. They can get the dispute kind of thing mentioned above put on the account but this is not ideal since there will stil be a joint account and thus a financial association with CRAs.

 

A current account is always either to sign so they should be able to close it. It can definately be closed without a card because that's what they do if someone has been paying off a reducing overdraft. They wouldn't get sent a new card if the account was only open to pay the OD off.

 

Ask to speak to a manager, perhaps make an appointment to do this, they are just sales managers now but have more discretion than regular staff so they will be eager to get it sorted and get back to 'motivating' thier staff to sell.

The views I express here are mere speculation based on my experience. I am not qualified nor insured to give legal advice and any action you take will be at your own risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...