Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, I am a local authority tenant and was in a 3 bed house. At the end of last year, my last child moved out and so did my spouse as we are now going through a divorce which meant that I was in the house alone and decided that I needed to downsize not only for myself but to offer the property to a family that needed it. I registered on the local authority housing bidding site as i was asked to do and I was accepted and given a priority banding as I was downsizing and they were desperate for my house. I have been extremely lucky and after about 6 weeks was accepted for a new build from a housing association via the housing gateway. I viewed the property 2 weeks ago and had to sign the tenancy last week when they were doing bulk signups for the houses and that is the day I moved. In between viewing and sign up, I contacted my current local authority landlord and asked how I give notice as I had been accepted for a property I had bid on and was moving.  The lady told me how to do it online and then said that I needed to give a full weeks notice which wasnt a problem as I had enough time.  (I was also told a weeks notice was what i would need to give by another staff member about a month ago when I phoned up for another housing related question.  I dont have any of this in writing.) I have now moved, handed back the keys and I am now being told that I need to give 4 weeks notice which I cannot afford. I hav e spoken to the council again explaining that I was told a week and that to be honest, if I knew they were going to charge me 4 weeks I would not have been able to move and would have stayed in the other house.  I thought I was doing the right thing. They said that calls are recorded and they asked me when I called in and was told a week and they would listen to the telephone conversation and if it was correct what I was told, they would see what they could do to reduce the notice period. They have now emailed me back and said that they have listened to the conversation and the lady said 4 weeks notice and I am liable for 4 weeks rent.  Now I may well of misheard her when I thought she said a full weeks notice she may have said 4 weeks notice but I am sure she said a full weeks notice and i was told a week by another member of staff a few weeks ago. I have emailed her back and said that I may of misheard but I would like to listen to the phone recording myself.  As yet they havent responded. I think its unreasonable for them to make me give 4 weeks when I had to sign the new tenancy with little notice or loose the property.  And it was all done through their gateway, and they will have a tenant in there pretty much straight away getting rent from them. I am on a very low income, I am on my own, I have serious medical issues and I am really getting myself stressed out over this. Any advice would be so appreciated.  Can I insist they let me listed to the recording? RH  
    • Susan Crichton is at the Inquiry today. She seems to have trouble remembering a lot of things but seems to find it easier if it's something that shows her in a good light.
    • Send them a letter of claim straightaway. No point hanging around. Given 14 days in the letter of claim and if they haven't paid you by then, issue the claim on day 15. The amount of time is more than adequate for them to get going. Post your draft letter of claim here. A look at. Then log onto the MoneyClaim website and start preparing your claim and post your particulars of claim here for us to have a look at. Don't bluff. No point in it.
    • That's what we thought, but the store manager is inferring that, as the jeweller we used was not a member of the NJA, no one  would give what he said, any credence. The Jeweller we used is in fact, a long established, well respected company, with 2 store and rather than just being a retailer, they craft the most exquisite jewellery inhouse!  I wish my Fiancé would have bought from them rather than H Samuel! Do you think we do need to get another report from and NJA accredited Jeweller ?
    • Really pleased that you won. UKPC know that you have supremacy of contract but still they persist because so many motorists blindly pay them.   Muppets.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council debt recovery (Summarry Warrant) + Inhibition of sale order.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5747 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

Here is my situation.

1. I previously lived in a shared flat with three other people (they only had my name) , and I pad council tax on the flat , however a debt was run up whilst I still lived there from 98 - 2000, however I had a wages arrestment for 1800 pound made against me , which I had to pay , however some three years later I got a letter stating that I owed them a further two thousand pound for what, they have still to prove to me , anyway I explained to them , two other people were staying there , one on benefit , and the other working, I gave them both the names (I did not have their addresses) and as far as I was aware that was that , until again I got a letter from Scott and Co demanding the 2k again ?

So I called Scott & co and explained the fact that I had previously paid 1800 pound in arrears , and that this was agreed as being my debt settled by the council on completion of said arrestment , until the further two thousand pounds claim. Scott and co rightly said I needed to contact the council. I duly did so and they said that they would need to get someone to get back to me, of course no one ever has.

2. I have also got another two accounts for my two previous flats (Listed on application of inhibition) , both of which myself and my ex partner believe we had paid in full, however they of course deny this , and even denied receiving a 600 payment we made to Scott and co, and subsequently continued to bills us for the most recent flat previous to where I am now, and to add insult to injury then billed for six months when we were not living their. Despite all our attempts to tell them otherwise, as well as trying to say we owed them money from the flat previous to the previous if that makes sense at all.

None of which they have backed up or supported with any sort of proof.

3. Today I got in, and had a letter stating they were proposing an application for inhibition of sale, as we are trying to sell our flat (which I still reside in), however I have been off sick from work with disc problems / sciatica since early march , and they are trying to say we have arrears of 2.6 thousand for all combined (inc billing us for the whole year in advance) , however when we call them one person says there is nothing owed on the previous two flats , and another says there is !!!!!!!!

So in an attempt to sort it all out I again called them today and stated that the letter I received was in all fairness a bit of a joke, simply because I have called the office numerous times previously (May / June / July) about the debt from the previous flats and also the summary warrants they are trying to execute despite my calling them and them never calling me back when they say they will.

Also I calling them today to discuss the matter , I wanted to record my calls now, as they always deny any and all knowledge of any conversation I have had previous with them over the phone , and it is really getting me down (pop quiz, can I record my calls if they are just for my own use , and if so should I not even bother telling them., .

Anyway back to the point , I am sitting with a bill for over 2.6 grand , and a mandate they want me to sign for the full amount (we don’t agree with) or they will stop me selling the flat , now the guy I spoke to (A Hanlin) stated if I don’t sign and return it , they make the inhibition happen, and we cant sell out flat end of,

Basically they say we owe them X and we are sure we owe them Y , + the fact they are also trying to make me pay other peolpes tax we had previously agreed as being settled, even after I paid an agreed amount via an arrestment that should have settled it , ..

I think this may be a bit vague, but my head is such a mess now with it all, that I really am becoming very stressed and don’t think I can face speaking to them again.

I wanted to know what my rights are in terms of information I can legally request they give (re all accounts)

and also if, as I asked previously, If I can record my calls to them regarding this matter.

Any advice would be really appreciated asap.

thanks in advance

Eather

BOS CASE 1 SETTLED IN FULL £1895 June 07

BOS CASE 2 IN PROGRESS *

_____________________________________________

knowledge is often mistaken for intelligence, this is like mistaking a cup of milk for a cow!

_____________________________________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...