Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Better version attached with the late appeal explained more clearly for the judge. This will sound silly, but I think it would be a good idea to e-mail it to the court and UKPC on Sunday.  It's probably me being daft, but Sunday is still March, and as it's late, sending it in March rather than April will make it sound like it was less late than it really is.  if you get my drift. You can still pop in a paper version on Tuesday if you want. E-mail address for the court: [email protected] And for UKPC: [email protected]   [email protected] Defendant WS.pdf
    • Update 15th March the eviction notice period expired, and I paid my next month rent along with sending them the message discussed above. After a short while they just emailed me back this dry phrase "Thank you for your email." In two weeks' time I'm gonna need to pay the rent again, and I have such a feeling that shortly after that date the contracts will be exchanged and all the payments will be made.  Now my main concern is, if possible, not to end up paying rent after I move out.  
    • they cant 'take away' anything, what ever makes you believe that?  dx  
    • The text on the N1SDT Claim Form 1.The claim is for breaching the terms and conditions set on private land. 2. The defendant's vehicle, NumberPlate, was identified in the Leeds Bradford Airport Roadways on the 28/07/2023 in breach of the advertised terms and conditions; namely Stopping in a zone where stopping is prohibited 3.At all material times the Defendant was the registered keeper and/or driver. 4. The terms and conditions upon  entering private land were clearly displayed at the entrance and in prominent locations 5. The sign was the offer and the act of entering private land was the acceptance of the offer hereby entering into a contract by conduct. 6.The signs specifically detail the terms and conditions and the consequences of failure to comply,  namely a parking charge notice will be issued, and the Defendant has failed to settle the outstanding liability. 7.The claimant seeks the recovery of the parking charge notice, contractual costs and interest.   This is what I am thinking of for the wording of my defence The Defendant contends that the particulars of claim are vague and are generic in nature which fails to comply with CPR 16.4. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.5 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 1. Paragraph 1 is denied. It is denied that the Defendant ever entered into a contract to breach any terms and conditions of the stated private land. 2. Paragraph 2 and 4 are denied. As held by the Upper Tax Tribunal in Vehicle Control Services Limited v HMRC [2012] UKUT 129 (TCC), any contract requires offer and acceptance. The Claimant was only contracted to provide car park management services and is not capable of entering into a contract with the Defendant on its own account, as the car park is owned by and the terms of entry set by the landowner. 3. It is admitted that Defendant is the recorded keeper of the vehicle. 4.  Paragraph 6 is denied the claimant has yet to evidence that their contract with the landowner supersedes  Leeds Bradford airport byelaws. Further it is denied that the Claimant’s signage is capable of creating a legally binding contract. 5. Paragraph 7 is denied, there are no contractual costs and interest cannot be accrued on a speculative charge.   I'm not sure whether point 4 is correct as I think this side road is not covered by byelaws? Any other suggestions/corrections would be appreciated.
    • Dear EVRi parcelnet LTD t/a evri   evri parcelnet isnt a thing also you say defendant's response which is a bit of a weird format.   Something like   Dear EVRi, Claim no xxxx In your defence you said you could not access tracking. Please see attached receipt and label Regards
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Council Tax Arrears over 10 years ago


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5730 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi I just got al etter in from Renfrewshire Council saying I owe them £1102 from an address that I lived at over 11 years ago.

 

Now between 1996 to 2002 approx I did have some really bad financial problems and I didnt pay my council tax at the time for a few years.(mainly because they never ever sent me a bill even though I was and did register to vote at this address during this time)

 

Now in October 2003 they sent me bills for the years that I had failed to pay and I then decided to get a loan out to pay off all the arrears that I belived I owed to bring my council tax up to date

 

Now they are asking for more money and I thought I had paid off all the arrears in 2003 and my point is how can I check up what I have payed for years 1996-2002 and what I owe so as I know that I deffonatly owe this money.

 

If I owe it I will pay it but I want to be sure I do owe it and really dont have a clue how to check back to well over 12 years of records?

 

Also how far back can they chase a council tax debt as Im sure this debt must be over 11 years old

 

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Council tax debts do not become statute barred.

 

I think they only way you would find out what you have paid etc is to send them an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request).

 

Edit to suit

Subject Access Request - Consumer Wiki

 

(take out the word banking)

 

You would need to include £10 and send recorded and they would need to send allinof payment, charges etc that they have for you.

 

 

Ida x

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Council tax debts do not become statute barred.

 

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

Forgive me but I am not sure what is meant by statue barred

 

Also I checked out your link and as you said it is based on writing to a bank and I will therefore add my references to the Council.I presume they are legally obliged to send me this information if I ask for it just like the banks

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

basically any debts that you have, cause you live in escosse, become statite barred after 5 years which means if you have not paid anything in 5 years then you have no obligation to pay them

 

BUT

 

there are some things that are exceptions like secured loans and blooming cooncil tax!

 

Re the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request). Yes they still have to send all the info just remove the word bank or banking and edit to suit

 

idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

its true about council tax not bing timed barred

in my research i believe they can not do enforcement action if over ten years old

but please do not quote me on that, some one who specalise in council tax will be able to confirm

i believe the courts call it an abuse of legal process

but like i said

not sure on that one

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again.

 

Also whilst you have been answering this I have investigated the procudure with my own Council regarding the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and have found that they have there own form for requesting access to this information.

 

I was going to apply for this on Monday with a cheque for £10 but what is putting me off is the fact they want me to send in either my ORIGINAL passport or driving licence rather than just a copy

 

As you can imagine the last thing I want is to send my passport/driving licence by post to my local coucil only for them to hang on to it for 40 days.

 

Do you or anyone else know if there can accept proof any other way than this

 

Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do not need proof if you provide you name address and any ref numbers

 

They are hapy to ask you for payment with these details so they should be happy for you to ask for details with these

 

You can still send the template SAR you do not need to fill in theirs

 

idax

Please contact a member of the site team if you are offered help off the forum for a a paid or no win no fee service.

 

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

Click here to donate through PayPal (opens in a new window)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just a quick follow up to all of the above.

 

As I may or may not have said I reiceved this demand for 11 year old council tax money today.Now in the last 2 weeks I have been applying for a re-mortgage and was wondering if the 2 could be linked in anyway or is this just a coincidence.

 

Could this have possibly flagged up during this process or am I just being paronoid?

 

I know there is no record of this debt on my credit file as I have had a recent copy of it posted to myself

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...