Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, With regard to the ANPR cameras in your post #65, while I was on the phone to the Planning Department, they did take a look at Google Streetview and went back to 2012 where they could see the ANPR cameras in place so therefore they would have deemed consent. I had previously read the T&C Planning Regulations and had read the section on deemed consent so I understood the point they made on the phone. It doesn't matter though, that doesn't harm my case any, and I shouldn't really mention this now, (this is what you reminded me of on another thread) but in the past I was a member of a scheme that gave me access to legal advice, I have spoken to a barrister previously through this scheme on another matter and I think I am still a member. I am going to check if I am still a member of the scheme, and if I am I will discuss my case with a barrister or solicitor, whichever the scheme deems appropriate. I will let you know the outcome. I am also going to take Bankfodders advice in the sticky and go to the local court and ask if I can sit in on a case in the Judges office.
    • deed?  you mean consent order you and her signed? concluding the case as long as you nor she break it's conditions signed upto? dx Yes sorry. they called it a deed at first in court.  Then Judge said she was happy to have it sealed as something else  exact names of orders in message above.     The disease was tested for when his cardiac testing was done immediately after purchase and part of the now sealed case.   However, results were disclosed incorrectly and I only found out  two days ago.   This disease did not form part of my knowledge during the case as I had been informed of a normal result that was not the case.   it is perfect clarity of a genetic disease where as the previous cardiac issue could be congenital until the pup is genetically tested. 
    • Hi, Halifax recently sold a credit card account of mine to Cabot. I am unemployed and have no assets and was thinking of making token £1 payments for 12-18 months in order to drag things out a bit and reduce the chance of Cabot being able to get the correct CCA documents from Halifax if I requested them in future. However, I saw on the pages on this forum about defending county court claims that one of the standard approaches when defending such claims is to say “I had an account with bank X, but I don’t remember the details and so don’t know if I owe this debt…”. If I made £1 payments to Cabot, would it prevent me from using such a defence in future? OC: Halifax DC: Cabot/Wescot Card account opened: 2016 Defaulted: 2023
    • Paperwork says sealed consent order and composite settlement agreement      YES  ADDISONS DISEASE 
    • Hi, This may be the wrong place for a thread BUT If you receive a defence, can you send a CPR 31.14 request for document mentioned in the defence, and then apply to proceed with the case only after (14) days passed or they respond OR is it only if you receive a claim I see @dx100uk thread is for when you receive a claim, but can you also do the same when you receive a defence?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old Debt 6 years, issued Statutory Demand help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5691 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

1st Credit have today sent me a Statutory Demand of Insolvency for a debt that is owed to Natwest Bank and is well over 6 years old.

 

I have not had any communication with this company, sent letters or event telephone contact.

 

Now this has arrived, obviously because i am on the Electoral Register in my new home.

 

Apparently i have 18 days to apply to the court to have it set aside, do i apply to the court under the statue of limitations, i do not want to ring them as this will start the whole new 6 year thing off.

 

Also there is no stamp on it from a court surely there would be the court address this was sent to, or am i wrong, is this just a scare tatic to try and get me to ring them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't set the "six year thing" off again by phoning them - only by acknowledging in writing or making a payment.

 

I believe (though I could be wrong) that you can apply for a set aside at your nearest court - and it should be free.

 

Don't forget to send the "statute barred" letter to Wirst credit then you can report them to TS next time they contact you

Carpe Jugulum

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your advice, yes i did look for a court address and it said that if i wish to have it set aside i should apply to my local court or in the first instance ring them

 

Maybe a ploy for me to contact them and slip me up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your advice, yes i did look for a court address and it said that if i wish to have it set aside i should apply to my local court or in the first instance ring them

 

Maybe a ploy for me to contact them and slip me up?

 

don't phone them!

You do have to apply for a set-aside tho, at your local court.

 

A statutory demand doesn't have to have a court seal - it does need to be "served", however - by a court process server, or possibly by FIRST class post.

Carpe Jugulum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask, is this debt for more than £750? Do you own your own home?

 

First credit are issuing stat demands like confetti at the moment. They issue actual petitions much more rarely, but you've nothing to lose applying for a set aside.

 

EDIT: And yeah, you can use that as the reason... depending what type of loan it was. (Erm, what type of loan was it?)

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes 960.00 and i do own my own home well only in the last year. I will have it setaside, i will also in my application after reading other threads that 1st Credit are abusing the process and issuing these like confetti, and i will also add a costs element for me as well.

 

I need advice on costs as i am self employed is there like a basic hourly rate etc.

 

It was not a loan i was overdrawn and was charges as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your costs would be the cost of attending a hearing, so basically traveling expenses and lost earnings. Have you written to them and / or paid them in the last six years?

 

No need to include the fact they are issuing them like confetti, although it is the truth, it won't help your case :)

 

Include the fact the debt was originally largly made up from bank charges, that you would seek to reclaim.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

 

Just to let you all know, i went to court to have the case set aside and 1st Credit & Connaught Collections failed to show. The case was set aside and i was awarded my costs 101.75.

 

Today a cheque arrived, they took me court for money, they never showed and now they have paid me.

 

The funniest thing is ...

 

I have now received another one from the same company for a different debt.

 

Here we go again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...