Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I hope Lord Frost is OK. Islamists and the woke Left are uniting to topple the West ARCHIVE.PH archived 18 Apr 2024 19:12:37 UTC  
    • Ok you are in the clear. The PCN does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4 for two reasons. The first is that in Section 9 [2][e]  says the PCN must "state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges ". It does not say that even though it continues correctly with blurb about the driver. The other fault is that there is no parking period mentioned. Their ANPR cameras do show your arrival and departure times but as that at the very least includes driving from the entrance to the parking space then later leaving the parking space and driving to the exit. It also doesn't allow for finding a parking spot: manoeuvering into it avoiding parking on the lines: possibly having to stop to allow pedestrians/other cars to pass in front of you; returning the trolley after finishing shopping; loading children disabled people in and out of the car, etc etc.  All of that could easily add five, ten or even 15 minutes to your time which the ANPR cameras cannot take into account. So even if it was only two hours free time you could  still have been within the  time since there is a MINIMUM of 15 minutes Grace period when you leave the car park. However as they cannot even manage to get their PCN to comply with the Act you as keeper cannot be pursued. Only the driver is now liable and they do not know who was driving as you have not appealed and perhaps unwittingly given away who was driving. So you do not owe them a penny. No need to appeal. Let them waste their money pursuing you . 
    • If Labour are elected I hope they go after everyone who made huge amounts of money out of this, by loading the company with debt. The sad thing is that some pension schemes, including the universities one, USS, will lose money along with customers.
    • What's the reason for not wanting a smart meter? Personally I'm saving a pile on a tariff only available with one. Today electricity is 17.17p/kWh. If the meter is truly past its certification date the supplier is obliged to replace it. If you refuse to allow this then eventually they'll get warrant and do so by force. Certified life varies between models and generations, some only 10 or 15 years, some older types as long as 40 years or maybe even more. Your meter should have its certified start date marked somewhere so if you doubt the supplier you can look up the certified life and cross check.
    • No I'm not. Even if I was then comments on this forum wouldn't constitute legal advice in the formal sense. Now you've engaged a lawyer directly can I just make couple of final suggestions? Firstly make sure he is fully aware of the facts. And don't mix and match by taking his advice on one aspect while ploughing your own furrow on others.  Let us know how you get on now you have a solicitor acting for you.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Old Debt 6 years, issued Statutory Demand help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5686 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All

 

1st Credit have today sent me a Statutory Demand of Insolvency for a debt that is owed to Natwest Bank and is well over 6 years old.

 

I have not had any communication with this company, sent letters or event telephone contact.

 

Now this has arrived, obviously because i am on the Electoral Register in my new home.

 

Apparently i have 18 days to apply to the court to have it set aside, do i apply to the court under the statue of limitations, i do not want to ring them as this will start the whole new 6 year thing off.

 

Also there is no stamp on it from a court surely there would be the court address this was sent to, or am i wrong, is this just a scare tatic to try and get me to ring them?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You won't set the "six year thing" off again by phoning them - only by acknowledging in writing or making a payment.

 

I believe (though I could be wrong) that you can apply for a set aside at your nearest court - and it should be free.

 

Don't forget to send the "statute barred" letter to Wirst credit then you can report them to TS next time they contact you

Carpe Jugulum

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your advice, yes i did look for a court address and it said that if i wish to have it set aside i should apply to my local court or in the first instance ring them

 

Maybe a ploy for me to contact them and slip me up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for your advice, yes i did look for a court address and it said that if i wish to have it set aside i should apply to my local court or in the first instance ring them

 

Maybe a ploy for me to contact them and slip me up?

 

don't phone them!

You do have to apply for a set-aside tho, at your local court.

 

A statutory demand doesn't have to have a court seal - it does need to be "served", however - by a court process server, or possibly by FIRST class post.

Carpe Jugulum

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask, is this debt for more than £750? Do you own your own home?

 

First credit are issuing stat demands like confetti at the moment. They issue actual petitions much more rarely, but you've nothing to lose applying for a set aside.

 

EDIT: And yeah, you can use that as the reason... depending what type of loan it was. (Erm, what type of loan was it?)

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Yes 960.00 and i do own my own home well only in the last year. I will have it setaside, i will also in my application after reading other threads that 1st Credit are abusing the process and issuing these like confetti, and i will also add a costs element for me as well.

 

I need advice on costs as i am self employed is there like a basic hourly rate etc.

 

It was not a loan i was overdrawn and was charges as well

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your costs would be the cost of attending a hearing, so basically traveling expenses and lost earnings. Have you written to them and / or paid them in the last six years?

 

No need to include the fact they are issuing them like confetti, although it is the truth, it won't help your case :)

 

Include the fact the debt was originally largly made up from bank charges, that you would seek to reclaim.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

 

Just to let you all know, i went to court to have the case set aside and 1st Credit & Connaught Collections failed to show. The case was set aside and i was awarded my costs 101.75.

 

Today a cheque arrived, they took me court for money, they never showed and now they have paid me.

 

The funniest thing is ...

 

I have now received another one from the same company for a different debt.

 

Here we go again

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...