Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • a 'witness' to it not arriving till the 15th is sadly immaterial too. regardless to the above anyway, the PCN remains valid. 
    • Hmm yes I see your point about proof of postage but nonetheless... "A Notice to Keeper can be served by ordinary post and the Protection of Freedoms Act requires that the Notice, to be valid,  must be delivered either (Where a notice to driver (parking ticket) has been served) Not earlier than 28 days after, nor more than 56 days after, the service of that notice to driver; or (Where no notice to driver has been served (e.g ANPR is used)) Not later than 14 days after the vehicle was parked A notice sent by post is to be presumed, unless the contrary is proved, to have been delivered on the second working day after the day on which it is posted; and for this purpose “working day” means any day other than a Saturday, Sunday or a public holiday in England and Wales." My question there is really what might constitute proof? Since you say the issue of delivery is a common one I suppose that no satisfactory answer has been established or you would probably have told me.
    • I would stand your ground and go for the interest. Even if the interest is not awarded you will get the judgement and the worst that might happen is that you won't get your claim fee.  However, it is almost inevitable that you will get the interest.  It is correct that it is at the discretion of the judge but the discretion is almost always exercised in favour of the claimant in these cases.  I think you should stand your ground and don't give even the slightest penny away Another judgement against them on this issue would be very bad for them and they would be really stupid to risk it but if they did, it would cost them far more than the interest they are trying to save which they will most likely have to pay anyway
    • Yep, true to form, they are happy to just save a couple of quid... They invariably lose in court, so to them, that's a win. 😅
    • Your concern regarding the 14 days delivery is a common one. Not been on the forum that long, but I don't think the following thought has ever been challenged. My view is that they should have proof of when it was posted, not when they "issued", or printed it. Of course, they would never show any proof of postage, unless it went to court. Private parking companies are simply after money, and will just keep sending ever more threatening letters to intimidate you into paying up. It's not been mentioned yet, but DO NOT APPEAL! You could inadvertently give up useful legal protection and they will refuse any appeal, because they're just after the cash...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How long can bailiffs leave my car clamped?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5763 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My car was clamped at 5.30am this morning, together with paperwork put through the letterbox for an unpaid PCN.

I telephoned the bailiffs company to tell them that I had filed a statutory declaration and and out of time declaration which I did only yesterday.

 

I also informed them that the vehicle was owned by a finance company, and left a copy of the finance documents on the doorstep, and asked them to return and remove the clamp.

 

They said "we will make our own enquiries".

 

I am wondering firstly what their next tactic will be, and secondly, how long can they leave the vehicle clamped

 

. In theory would it not be against their interests to return and have it proved to them that they cant take the vehicle?

Therefore could they just leave it clamped in the hope that I pay in any case?

Any advice gratefully received :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi Gatto,

Any news, it is 18.00hrs has the clamp been removed, do you need to use your car urgently if so you could consider clicking on the red triangle, this will open a pop up window, you can leave a message for the site team I am sure they can direct a forum member with expertise to your post.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunately I don't need the car for work....or for a few days in fact, thankfully!

 

I had a couple of conversations with the bailiff today.

I left a copy of the finance agreement on my doorstep as I had to go to work, and I told the bailiff this on my first phone call, I also informed them that the car belonged to the finance company and they could satisfy themselves of this by reading the documentation.

 

Incidently they clamped the car just after 5 am and didnt knock on the door....I don't know if they are supposed to....or if they aren't allowed to knock before a certain hour?

 

At approx 4pm they came back to the house and my brother observed them taking the paperwork and reading it in their car. They then put the paperwork back through the letterbox and drove off leaving the clamp in place.

 

I telephoned them again and asked them where we now stood. They said that nothing had changed and that according to a clause in the paperwork I was liable for any fines due to be paid against the car. I pointed out that they were trying to bamboozle me as this did not mean that the finance company gave them the right to take a 30k car for a £500 fine it simply mean that I was liable to the finance company for fines etc. I also pointed out that they had undermined their own argument as clearly they were admitting knowledge that the car belonged to the finance company.

 

I also pointed out that stat dec and OOT were being filed and would be faxed to them this afternoon which they were. They tried the usual wind ups and arguing about what was in the stat dec which is clearly nothing to do with them.

 

I finished by insisting that as they had demonstrated that they knew the car was not mine they didn't have a valid seizure of the vehicle and that if they didn't remove it by tomorrow afternoon I would take further action. The end of the conversation was:

 

ME: so are you going to remove the clamp?

THEM: I might.....

 

It was a pretty heated conversation :)

 

I feel I am on strong ground but I don't know whether I have provoked them into removing the vehicle or frightened them into removing the clamp, so I will wake up worried tomorrow...

 

Have I done the right thing?

 

Thoughts and observations welcome :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure there is a difference between clamping and seizing goods. They have not seized the car with the intention of selling it to pay the debt but immobilised it until you pay the fine, therefore ownership is not relevant since your agreement says you are liable. Having said that once the TEC has received the Stat Dec all enforcement of the fine should cease.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am surprised that the bailiff has not removed the clamp....most that we deal with would normally return to tremove the clamp within a few hours of receiving confirmation from the local authority that the Out of Time had been filed.

 

The Out of Time is of course a "feezing action" and clause 8.1 of part 75 of the CPR rules specifically state that the local authority must cease all enforcement when an application has been filed. This would mean that the vehicle cannot be put of a tow truck and removed.

 

Did the bailiff leave a Notice of Seizure of goods & Inventory and a copy of the warrant of execution ? He MUST by law do this.

 

If you send me a PM with the name of the bailiff and the firm he works for, I will check our database to ensure that he is certificated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...