Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi welcome to the Forum.  If a PCN is sent out late ie after the 12th day of the alleged offence, the charge cannot then be transferred from the driver to the keeper.T he PCN is deemed to have arrived two days after dispatch so in your case, unless you can prove that Nexus sent the PCN several days after they claim you have very little chance of winning that argument. All is not lost since the majority of PCNs sent out are very poorly worded so that yet again the keeper is not liable to pay the charge, only the driver is now liable. If you post up the PCN, front and back we will be able to confirm whether it is compliant or not. Even if it is ok, there are lots of other reasons why it is not necessary to pay those rogues. 
    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

How long can bailiffs leave my car clamped?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5762 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My car was clamped at 5.30am this morning, together with paperwork put through the letterbox for an unpaid PCN.

I telephoned the bailiffs company to tell them that I had filed a statutory declaration and and out of time declaration which I did only yesterday.

 

I also informed them that the vehicle was owned by a finance company, and left a copy of the finance documents on the doorstep, and asked them to return and remove the clamp.

 

They said "we will make our own enquiries".

 

I am wondering firstly what their next tactic will be, and secondly, how long can they leave the vehicle clamped

 

. In theory would it not be against their interests to return and have it proved to them that they cant take the vehicle?

Therefore could they just leave it clamped in the hope that I pay in any case?

Any advice gratefully received :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi Gatto,

Any news, it is 18.00hrs has the clamp been removed, do you need to use your car urgently if so you could consider clicking on the red triangle, this will open a pop up window, you can leave a message for the site team I am sure they can direct a forum member with expertise to your post.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunately I don't need the car for work....or for a few days in fact, thankfully!

 

I had a couple of conversations with the bailiff today.

I left a copy of the finance agreement on my doorstep as I had to go to work, and I told the bailiff this on my first phone call, I also informed them that the car belonged to the finance company and they could satisfy themselves of this by reading the documentation.

 

Incidently they clamped the car just after 5 am and didnt knock on the door....I don't know if they are supposed to....or if they aren't allowed to knock before a certain hour?

 

At approx 4pm they came back to the house and my brother observed them taking the paperwork and reading it in their car. They then put the paperwork back through the letterbox and drove off leaving the clamp in place.

 

I telephoned them again and asked them where we now stood. They said that nothing had changed and that according to a clause in the paperwork I was liable for any fines due to be paid against the car. I pointed out that they were trying to bamboozle me as this did not mean that the finance company gave them the right to take a 30k car for a £500 fine it simply mean that I was liable to the finance company for fines etc. I also pointed out that they had undermined their own argument as clearly they were admitting knowledge that the car belonged to the finance company.

 

I also pointed out that stat dec and OOT were being filed and would be faxed to them this afternoon which they were. They tried the usual wind ups and arguing about what was in the stat dec which is clearly nothing to do with them.

 

I finished by insisting that as they had demonstrated that they knew the car was not mine they didn't have a valid seizure of the vehicle and that if they didn't remove it by tomorrow afternoon I would take further action. The end of the conversation was:

 

ME: so are you going to remove the clamp?

THEM: I might.....

 

It was a pretty heated conversation :)

 

I feel I am on strong ground but I don't know whether I have provoked them into removing the vehicle or frightened them into removing the clamp, so I will wake up worried tomorrow...

 

Have I done the right thing?

 

Thoughts and observations welcome :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am pretty sure there is a difference between clamping and seizing goods. They have not seized the car with the intention of selling it to pay the debt but immobilised it until you pay the fine, therefore ownership is not relevant since your agreement says you are liable. Having said that once the TEC has received the Stat Dec all enforcement of the fine should cease.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am surprised that the bailiff has not removed the clamp....most that we deal with would normally return to tremove the clamp within a few hours of receiving confirmation from the local authority that the Out of Time had been filed.

 

The Out of Time is of course a "feezing action" and clause 8.1 of part 75 of the CPR rules specifically state that the local authority must cease all enforcement when an application has been filed. This would mean that the vehicle cannot be put of a tow truck and removed.

 

Did the bailiff leave a Notice of Seizure of goods & Inventory and a copy of the warrant of execution ? He MUST by law do this.

 

If you send me a PM with the name of the bailiff and the firm he works for, I will check our database to ensure that he is certificated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...