Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Dear Sir/Madam, TFL case number: **** I would like to thank TFL for providing me the opportunity to explain my behaviour. I realised the stupidity of what I have done and wish to seek a resolution to this matter. I have no valid excuse for this action and I am extremely sorry and deeply regret my action. I hope you will accept my sincere apologies. Nothing can justify my action. I am aware that TFL are only able to operate if everyone pays their fare correctly and I feel so guilty about attempting to breach public trust. This has caused me sleepness nights and raised my anxieties. I have history of anxiety. This has been a hard lesson learnt. I have never been in trouble with the law in the past and I ensure that I won’t be in the future. I am and will be using my oyster card (PAYG). I would like to humbly appeal to TFL to allow me to settle this matter out of court and avoid going to prosecution given the adverse consequences it can have on me and my family. I am very concerned that prosecution for the first time and I would like to make restitution for my action. Having a criminal offense on my record will have detrimental consequences on me. I have always been a law abiding person and have no previous offences. I would really appreciate if I can be given the opportunity to pay for any unpaid fares plus any charges and/or administrative cost which have been incurred by TFL due to this incident. I am sincerely remorseful and ashamed of myself, and I fully appreciate the severity and stupidity of my transgressions. Again, I would like to offer my sincerest apologies. Yours Faithfully, My Name
    • the date is 19/04/24, so i have until 29/4/24 to reply? Yes, i will send my draft of my begging letter   
    • use the webform if it allows you to attach your evidential documents then do so but do that later depending upon who your bank is.... - but i suspect you will be referred to Mastercard. who is your bank? dx    
    • If i did it through the bank, they seem to have an online form. I wondered if this is the best way or to do a letter, add supporting documents and send them through the post, recorded delivery  ?
    • the process for attaining a charging order is the same no matter what it results in. interim first then latter they can go for a full charging order. at ICO stage its recorded the same on your deeds until a full CO is applied for and granted. however, as in your case, it resulted in simply a restriction k which cannot be converted into a full charging order so the entry remains stating ICO. smart cookies on your side IMHO now ...hope you succeed. dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Alias on my credit report?


Shutsumon
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4898 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I just got through checking my credit report and there's an alias on it and I have no idea who this person is (except that they aren't me). There's no credit checks or debts I don't recognise on the report so I doubt it's a fraud thing. So I'm a little baffled as to where they got it.

 

Thing is this "alias" is my first name and initial with my mum's maiden name as surname. I've definately never used this name. Has my data got mixed up with some other poor bod with a similar name or should I be worried about fraud in spite of there being no attempts to gain credit that aren't mine (and precious few of those due to my history)? Should I try and get it removed? If so how?

 

My mum's name is also linked to mine (not as an alias) on the report which in one sense is fair enough since we were financially related as well as genetically... but she died in 2001, should it still be there?

 

Shutsumon

Link to post
Share on other sites

The most likely way in which your name is linked with your mum's would be if you and your mum made a credit application (or utilities, mobile phone etc) in joint names, or if you or she acted as guarantor for the other. This then creates a financial link with the other person and their own credit history.

 

Depending on the choice of the lender (and the wording on the application form) your credit applications may then be considered not just on your own credit history but also on those of anyone who you have had a link with.

 

As to why your mum's maiden name is showing - no idea I'm afraid. The CRA should have a helpline where you can query this and hopefull get it resolved.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The most likely way in which your name is linked with your mum's would be if you and your mum made a credit application (or utilities, mobile phone etc) in joint names, or if you or she acted as guarantor for the other. This then creates a financial link with the other person and their own credit history.

 

Depending on the choice of the lender (and the wording on the application form) your credit applications may then be considered not just on your own credit history but also on those of anyone who you have had a link with.

 

Yeah, that was my summise. She was disabled and I was her carer so we were financially linked due me being on virtually everything credit related she had. Even the loan-o-doom was joint. I was only surprised since she's been dead for seven years. Can you even check a file after the person is deceased? (Though hell her credit rating was likely better than mine is right now).

 

 

As to why your mum's maiden name is showing - no idea I'm afraid. The CRA should have a helpline where you can query this and hopefull get it resolved.

 

Yeah I'll have to do that once I don't have a sore throat. Can't talk at the moment. :( But how will I prove to them that I'm not this other person? I'd never do anything so fundamentally dishonest as apply for credit in a false name.

 

Becky

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your credit record should have a reference number assigned to it, and they go through very thorough checks so that you say who say you are. In the first instance call them, and see what they can do. They will probably say they need it in writing, but you have all the details anyway, so it "should" just be a formality. Another thing they allow is for you to add a note from yourself, so they might suggest that, but just call and ask for advice anyway.

 

Regards etc...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I found I had a number of aliases on mine 21 to be in fact.....I emailed experian who were really quite good. Would you believe that a lot of the aliases came from incorrect spelling of my name and the biggest joke was it was Orange PLC.... several times throughout the file registered against me though twice on there they got my name spelt right but still managed to get it wrong at least 8 times. The reference is very handy to give experian, I made a list of each entry giving the ref and they investigated this and got them removed after contacting orange and them sent me an email to confirm this and also advise they would let all companies who had searched my file in the last 6 mths know also.

 

So I would definitely suggest emailing them if you are not in a position to speak!!

I'm fighting back and ready to go :D who will be my first victim? LBL, Brighthouse.

 

..."If you have no confidence in self, you are twice defeated in the race of life."

 

I am not here to insult or offend...just to offer advice and seek advice as all this is a learning experience, such is the cycle of life...for those that would wish to insult me for my thoughts or deeds...Stay Blessed for I know my heart is pure with no ill thought towards YOU. :cool:

Nationwide Won:D Benefits returned £577

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

I have just gone through my Experien report & never noticed it before, but my aliases have me also known as my husband! I checked his file & all my debt is on his file too??? None of these debts are joint applications, they are my credit cards & mobile (orange) phone accounts past & present this has made me angry as my husband's credit file is in poorer shape than mine. no wonder I have problem getting credit - It looks very dodgy!

I've emailed Experien with the ref Nos. Can I expect anything more than an apology - who would be to blame for this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...