Patricia Pearl - Small Claims Procedure - A Practical Guide


An excellent guide for the layperson in how to use the County Court - a must if you are intending to start a claim.

£19.99 + £1.50 (P&P)




Last Will and Testament Kit


Make a legally valid will without the fuss and expense of a solicitor - includes a full step-by-step guide.

£9.99 + £1.50 (P&P)

BAILIFFS - The Law and Your Rights

Written by John Kruse, one of the leading experts on Bailiff Law, this consumer friendly guide is essential reading for anyone who comes into contact with a bailiff.

The book is easy to understand and clearly explains the rights a bailiff has, and also what they cannot do when collecting debts and repossessing goods etc.

£13.95 + £2.00 (P&P)


Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg. 05783665 in the UK

reg. office:
923 Finchley Road
London
NW11 7PE



+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Royalties Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    13,007

    Default Changes to CPZ. Is a new TRO needed?

    The local council have recently re-marked the parking bays in a CPZ. Most are block bays, but there are three single bays which were previously marked as individual bays (as per TSRGD 1032.) These have now be re-marked as if they are block bays (as per TSRGD 1028)




    The council say that in a CPZ there is no such thing as an individual bay and that these single bays, although only large enough for one normal car, are in fact long enough for two Smart cars and are therefore block bays.


    At the same time they have altered three other bays, removed one and extended two others.


    In changing the single bay markings and and altering the size of others, would a new TRO have to be made?

    Similar Threads:

  2. #2
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    nero12 Informative nero12 Informative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,002

    Default Re: Changes to CPZ. Is a new TRO needed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Browne View Post
    The local council have recently re-marked the parking bays in a CPZ. Most are block bays, but there are three single bays which were previously marked as individual bays (as per TSRGD 1032.) These have now be re-marked as if they are block bays (as per TSRGD 1028)




    The council say that in a CPZ there is no such thing as an individual bay and that these single bays, although only large enough for one normal car, are in fact long enough for two Smart cars and are therefore block bays.


    At the same time they have altered three other bays, removed one and extended two others.


    In changing the single bay markings and and altering the size of others, would a new TRO have to be made?
    yes because the current tro is now out of date and inacurate


  3. #3
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    lamma Informative lamma Informative lamma Informative lamma Informative lamma Informative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6,869

    Default Re: Changes to CPZ. Is a new TRO needed?

    from the TSRGD (page 8 pf the pdf version of the complete document)

    “controlled parking zone” means either
    (a) an area—
    (i) in which, except where parking places have been provided, every road has been marked with one or more of the road markings shown in diagrams
    1017, 1018.1, 1019 and 1020.1; and
    (ii) into which each entrance for vehicular traffic has been indicated by the sign shown in diagram 663 or 663.1; or
    (b) an area—
    (i) in which at least one of the signs shown in diagram 640.2A has been placed on each side of every road; and
    (ii) into which each entrance for vehicular traffic has been indicated by the sign shown in diagram 665;


  4. #4
    Royalties Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative Michael Browne Highly authoritative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    13,007

    Default Re: Changes to CPZ. Is a new TRO needed?

    Thanks, Nero, I assumed as much. If there is no new TRO, I'm also assuming that any pcnicon's issued would be invalid?


  5. #5
    Classic Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a contribution
    nero12 Informative nero12 Informative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    1,002

    Default Re: Changes to CPZ. Is a new TRO needed?

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Browne View Post
    Thanks, Nero, I assumed as much. If there is no new TRO, I'm also assuming that any pcnicon's issued would be invalid?
    if the current tro does not show these new bays and markings then they are invalid.


  6. #6
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    green_and_mean Highly informative green_and_mean Highly informative green_and_mean Highly informative green_and_mean Highly informative green_and_mean Highly informative green_and_mean Highly informative green_and_mean's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    6,968

    Default Re: Changes to CPZ. Is a new TRO needed?

    The bay markings are unimportant its the position and restriction thats relevant.


  7. #7
    Gold Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Download our toolbar
    patdavies Authoritative patdavies Authoritative patdavies Authoritative patdavies Authoritative patdavies Authoritative patdavies Authoritative patdavies Authoritative patdavies Authoritative patdavies Authoritative

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,029

    Default Re: Changes to CPZ. Is a new TRO needed?

    Surely

    1) if the changes to the CPZ invalidate the old TRO (ie the old TRO refers to the spaces outlined above as single bays), then until a new TRO is in place, the whole CPZ is unenforceable?

    2) If the lines for an individual parking space or bay are wrong, then no pcnicon can be enforced for that space or bay


  8. #8
    Platinum Account Holder
    Help the CAG!!
    Make a donation
    green_and_mean Highly informative green_and_mean Highly informative green_and_mean Highly informative green_and_mean Highly informative green_and_mean Highly informative green_and_mean Highly informative green_and_mean's Avatar

    Follow Real_CAG on Twitter

    Cagger since
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    6,968

    Default Re: Changes to CPZ. Is a new TRO needed?

    It depends on the wording of the TRO if it says for example, 'disabled parking outside nos 1-5' as long as thats what there is it doesn't matter if its several single bays or one long bay as long as the markings comply with the TRSGD. Going by the original post it would seem the bays have simply been repainted and as such have to comply with the latest TRSGD which indicates single lines at the ends of bays not double.



Browsealoud
Video Tour



Reclaim the Right Ltd. - reg.05783665 in the UK reg. office:- 923 Finchley Road London NW11 7PE