Thread: Parking ticket

"Entitled to assume that you were driving the vehicle on the day in question". The nerve of them. They are of course entitled to assume no such thing. If they want to take it further they would have to provide clear evidence that the RK was driving, which of course they will not be able to do. It would be tempting to reply with "I am entitled to assume that you are talking out of your rear end".

I would ignore them from here on out as they have obviously screwed up big time with statement. If pressed in future you may want to refer them to Arkell v. Pressdram

Ok thanks for the reply

you have no obligation whatsoever to tell a PPC who was driving despite anything they may say on their paperwork, their website or their trolling posts on here.
this is not a S172 request after all... its an invoice (begging letter).

I just have a feeling they will keep writing to me!!!!

they probably will.. so what !!! it is meaningless drivel. let them spend their time and money sending useless letters !!!

Ok sounds good to me.

Can I take them for harassment then??

let them keep digging themselves into a hole and when the letters dry up review them. There are many statutes regularly broken by PPCs...

sounds like fairly usual bogus demands and lies. the real situation is well documented here.

keep the letter, they are still digging themselves into that hole

Thanks, I didnt know they could pass the details onto another company in light of my dispute? Also they didnt even give me the 14 days they said they would!!!

On the data protection they are listed as:

Purpose 5

Crime Prevention and Prosecution of Offenders

Purpose Description:

Crime prevention and detection and the apprehension and prosecution of offenders.

Data Controllers further description of Purpose:

INCLUDES USE OF CLOSED-CIRCUIT TELEVISION FOR THE MONITORING AND COLLECTION
OF SOUND AND/OR VISUAL IMAGES FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAINTAINING THE SECURITY OF
PREMISES, FOR PREVENTING CRIME AND INVESTIGATING CRIME.



From what I've read on the forums I cant see how any criminal activity has occured here?

Agreed, does rather sound like same old, same old. No particular need to reply.

Perhaps we should all save the stamps for complaints to MPs, AA, RAC, DVLA, OFT, TS, etc.

I have noticed all letters are written to my company, with sir/madam. I am reoplying with my name (as the director I am writing on behalf of the company). Is this an issue and should I be writing "I".