Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Claim for possession of property


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5825 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My husband and I have received a Claim for possession of property form, we are seeking to defend it ourselves, as we are not in arrears on repayments and do not really understand why this order has been made, but need a bit longer than 14 days, as I am not too well at the mo...:(

 

Would anyone be able to confirm if we can use the N9 - Acknolwedgement of Service to extend our delivery of the defence form?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bona

 

The hearing is for the 7th May 2008. The monies borrowed were for a business we ran that went belly up after the US company we had a franchise with pull all international franchises without notice.

 

The business loan was secured on our home, and in 2006 they approached us to make repayment. The sum owed in 2006 was £65K. They were looking for us to pay £750 pcm but with we negoitated we would make lump sum payments and clear it quicker and paid £43K in 2006, £13K 2007 and are on course to clear the balance of around £13K July this year.

 

If we had met their demands for £750 pcm we would have taken ten years to clear the loan, the route we agreed with them (because we have irregular incomes) has meant it will be cleared in 3 years instead! (Maybe they are peeved because they will earn less interest from us :))

 

We have in the last three years got ourselves we have worked hard to get ourselves out of debt (as there were many unsecured debts as well) and will be debt free (apart from our mortgage July this year). The company have acknowledged that they had an informal arrangement with us but now they want all the money now rather than July 2008. We can not clear it before then, and feel they are been unreasonable and have gone back on their word.

 

We feel we have a pretty good case to build, as we have stuck to our agreement and are on track to repay all sums shortly. We are not in a position to do it sooner, as income does not come in before July to enable us to clear this and all our other debts.

 

I feel this company has harrassed us - with sending surveyors to value our property without notification, send communications to our elderly parents chasing £30K from them (when only £13K is owed) when they promised not to use the guarantee with our parents as our mother has a very serious heart condition and was hospitalised when the first chased in 2006.

 

I have pluersisy at the moment and am on antibotics but it has worn me out and would like to see if completing an Acknowledgement of Service can be used to give us an extra seven days.

 

Many thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi SWTS

You've done really well to get yourselves this far paying such large amounts.

Have you got the repayment agreement from the company in writing or was it just verbal?

 

On the matter of the American company pulling all UK franchises was there nothing you could do to recoup your outlay? It seems they just ripped you off. You probably tried everything at the time but did you go to trading standards to see if they could help?

 

I don't know about the extension time for court I will try and find out for you in the meantime some one in the know may come along.

 

Remember to make notes of everytime this company has contactsed you or your parents and what they said. Ideally do not speak to them by phone.

 

A lot of companies (and banks) are panicking at the moment and are trying to get as much money in as possible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, I have just checked with my local court manager who tells me that you cannot use an N9 form. However, although the N11m you have received says the defence has to be returned in 14 days, as long as the court has your defence before the end of this month it will be fine - they just need a week or so before the hearing to put the file together. She confirmed that all county courts have the same process.

 

If you need any help at all with completing the defence form and in particular Section 27 (the important part) I will be more than happy to walk you through the form, and write the statement for 27.

 

I hope you feel better soon, it must be very distressing to have this trouble when you are poorly.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Wino

 

Thank you for your reply, we really appreciate how helpful everyone is!

 

The company never put our agreement in writing (and in hind sight I can see this is not ideal) but the fact that they have received these lump sum payments and not chased in between might show that they did agree to it. There are letters from them that show there agreement although they do not state in black and white the finer details. The letter from the solictors regarding them chasing our parents acknowledge in writing that they did have this informal agreement with us, so again this might be sufficent proof, or certainly calls in to question their assertions.

 

We did look at taking legal action against the US company - but with been left high and dry with the debts the additional costs would be too much. We did try and work with this company to sort it out, but a multi million pound business can afford legal resources that we could not. In the end up we had to take a pragmatic rather than an emotional decision and sort our mess out, keep ourselves sain and move on.

 

We have learnt a lot, It did effect us badly for a long time after, but as a family we are together and stronger...and can live on very little and still enjoy our lives.

 

 

Cheers :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

He Ell-enn

 

Thank you for your response and offer of assistance, it is very much appreciated. I am going to get a letter to the court today explaining illness and that we will have the paperwork to them late next week, I will send a copy to the solictors as well.

 

I have had a quick look at the Defence form and it seems reasonably straightforward (could be famous last word!!). If it works with you we will fill it out as soon as we are feeling a bit better and forward you a copy for you to look over. I can put together a statetment for section 27 and forward that as well.

 

I think the worst thing about pluersisy is my ribs are killing me, and I am not getting a great nights sleep, so I look (and feel) as if I have aged 40 years in a few days :wink:. Trying not to get too distressed about this - I feel we have taken responsibility for our financial messes, we have worked hard to clear such large debts in three years - and we are going to be even happier when we are debt free later this year!

 

Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Trying not to be too nervours about our hearing tomorrow. It is always daunting going to court. Thanks to fanstastic support and advice from Ell-enn and others. We really appreciate all the input and support!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck you will be fine just remeber a few important things I assume you have put yuor defence in the judge will have read it let him ask the questions let the otherside dig a hole forthemselves, Dont talk to the other side unless it is to ask them to withdraw what ever you say THEY WILL USE AGAINST YOU if they do not turn up ask that they be not awarded the costs they have incurred and you want yours loss of earnings travell and anything else you can think of

Will be waiting you post tomorrow to let us know how you got on

 

Were all here for you

 

Bona xxx

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi All

 

The judge was scathing that LTSB were taking such an action when so little was owed, and so much has been paid, and there was so much equity in the home.

 

As it was an 'all monies charge' the seems the judges hands were tied but using Habib -V- Tailor [1982] the judge ordered a suspended possession order for three months along with a money order.

 

This should give us room to move things forward.

 

At court a Barrister from CAB offered to come in with us and put forward our case - which was very useful.

 

We really appreciate the assistance and support we have received here, and to Ell-enn a big thank you for helping us with our statement.

 

Now for the next chapter!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's great news - hope it all works out for you from now on.

 

Kind Regards

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...