Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I received a Parking Charge letter to keeper on Monday 15/04/24, the 17th day after the alleged incident. My understanding is that this is outside the window for notifying. The issue date was 08/04/2024 which should have been in good time for it to have arrived within the notice period but in fact it actually arrived at lunchtime on the 15th. Do I have to prove when it arrived  (and if so how can I do that?) or is the onus on them to prove it was delivered in time? All I can find is that delivery is assumed to be on the second working day after issue which would have been Weds 10//04/24 but it was actually delivered 5 days later than that (thank you Royal Mail!). My husband was present when it arrived - is a family member witness considered sufficient proof? 1 Date of the infringement  arr 28/03/24 21:00, dep 29/03/24 01.27 2 Date on the NTK  08/04/2024 (Date of Issue) 3 Date received Monday 15/04/24 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012?  Yes 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No    Have you had a response?  n/a 7 Who is the parking company? GroupNexus 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] Petrol Station Roadchef Tibshelf South DE55 5T 'operating in accordance with the BPA's Code of Practice'  
    • lookinforinfo - many thanks for your reply. It would be very interesting to get the letter of discontinuance. The court receptionist said that the county court was in Gloucester 'today' so that makes me think that some days it is in Gloucester and some days its in Cheltenham, it was maybe changed by the courts and i was never informed, who knows if DCBL were or not. My costs were a gallon of petrol and £3.40 for parking. I certainly don't want to end up in court again that's for sure but never say never lol. Its utterly disgusting the way these crooks can legally treat motorists but that's the uk for you. I'm originally from Scotland so it's good that they are not enforceable there but they certainly still try to get money out of you. I have to admit i have lost count of the pcn's i have received in the last 2 yr and 4 months since coming to England for work, most of them stop bothering you on their own eventually, it was just this one that they took it all the way. Like i mentioned in my WS the the likes of Aldi and other companies can get them cancelled but Mcdonalds refused to help me despite me being a very good customer.   brassednecked - many thanks   honeybee - many thanks   nicky boy - many thanks    
    • Huh? This is nothing about paying just for what I use - I currently prefer the averaged monthly payment - else i wouldn't be in credit month after month - which I am comfortable with - else I wold simply request a part refund - which I  would have done if they hadn't reduced my monthly dd after the complaint I raised (handled slowly and rather badly) highlighted the errors in their systems (one of which they do seem to have fixed) Are you not aware DD is always potentially variable? ah well, look it up - but my deal is a supposed to average the payments over a year, and i dont expect them to change payments (up or down) without my informed agreement ESPECIALLY when I'm in credit over winter.   You are happy with your smart meter - jolly for you I dont want one, dont have to have one  - so wont   I have a box that tells me my electricity usage - was free donkeys years ago and shows me everything I need to know just like a smart meter but doesnt need a smart meter,  and i can manually set my charges - so as a side effect - would show me if the charges from the supplier were mismatched. Doesn't tell me if the meters actually calibrated correctly - but neither does your smart meter. That all relies on a label and the competence of the testers - and the competence of any remote fiddling with the settings. You seem happy with that - thats fine. I'm not.    
    • Evening all,   So today, I was sent an updated offer that includes the £12.60 I spent on letters, but they have declined to add the interest at £7.40. They have stating 'We acknowledge your request to claim interest to date, however, this would be at the discretion of a trial judge if the claim did proceed to a trial hearing.' I think I am content with this outcome, and pushing this to a trial for a total interest of £15.30 throughout the claim does not make sense to me.   What are people's thoughts? I am sure our courts have better things to concentrate on?
    • FFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdfFFRSG3424ListofEvidencepdf-V1 2-merged.pdf 2pages T&C,s UCM
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Hyundai Warranty Problems


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2544 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I'd be grateful for any advice you might have on a problem I'm currently having with Hyundai UK.

 

I own a Hyundai Coupe which has been largely trouble free since I bought it (new) in March 2003. As you might know, Hyundai sell new cars with a 5 year warranty - one of the their key selling points in the UK and has proven a very successful strategy. The car was registered on March 17th 2003 and the warranty runs 5 years from that date.

 

Now, on the 14th March I was driving to work and the car stuttered at a junction. It didn't stall, but the "check engine" light came on and stayed on. This is the first time I've ever seen that light, so was alarmed to say the least. I called my local Hyundai dealer, explained the issue and also the impending warranty expiry, and they booked it in for Monday 17th March.

 

I took it into the dealer as agreed and left it there all day on Monday 17th March. I picked it up in the afternoon and they explained that a lead had perished and was causing a misfire - they had ordered a replacement. I brought the car back in the next day (Tuesday 18th March), the lead was replaced and £25 or so later I drove home. When I got home, the car misfired again and the "check engine" light came back on!

 

I took it back into the dealer on the Wednesday (19th March) and they again had it all day. When I returned in the afternoon, I was told they had replaced a spark plug but they didn't think that would fix it. The service manager told me that they suspected one of a multitude of causes, the worst of which could be a cracked inlet manifold. Total cost for this worst case: £1500!

 

Now, as they couldn't be certain of the cause they needed to do proper diagnostics. As this is apparently two hours work, they applied to Hyundai for a warranty work order. Hyundai thought about it overnight, then refused as the car was now out of warranty. The dealer called me on Thursday 20th March and passed on this information, along with the escalation guidelines for these sorts of cases. Apparently I needed to appeal for "goodwill" to Hyundai. I wasn't encouraged by his parting words: "Hyundai don't actually do goodwill - they see the 5 year warranty as a favour to customers!"

 

I called customer services and explained the situation, getting a case number etc. The car has a full main dealer service history and was bought new from a Hyundai main dealer, the problem occurred and was reported within warranty period etc.

 

Hyundai apparently considered the issue over easter and yesterday (25th March) came to the same conclusion as before: no good will would be forthcoming. On the phone their case officer explained their case as follows:

 

1. The problem was reported outside of warranty. Regardless of the fact that their main dealer faffed around for several days before deciding something much more serious was wrong, they could not be held to account for that.

 

2. No diagnostics had been performed, so they could not commit to a problem that was unknown. I would have to pay for the diagnostics (£185 or so) and then they would consider the issue again....maybe. They would not to commit to any further action or any reimbursement of these diagnostics costs, regardless of the issue.

 

3. Having faffed around already, my faith in the dealer actually finding and resolving the problem has lessened considerably!

 

I've asked for this opinion in writing, which should arrive by the end of the week. I'm incensed at Hyundai - for 5 years I've paid over the odds for servicing in an attempt to avoid this kind of issue should it arrive. This seems like extreme bad faith on their part. I'm also not sure where I stand legally, given that the dealer faffed around before reporting the problem to Hyundai!

 

Has anyone else had any similar issues with other manufacturers or any advice on this one?

 

Many thanks in advance!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

This five year warranty is a gimmick and a waste of time. All decisions are made at arms length by Hyundai UK and they take no account of dealer`s influence. All work has to be paid up front and Hyundai then decide whether to reimburse or not. Decisions are made in an arbitary fashion as to whether the failure of the part is due to fair wear and tear or a material defect. Mileage , age or care in use has no bearing on this as they simply make up the rules as they go along. Once you have parted with your money try getting it back ! If the repair is not completed for any reason by the time the warranty runs out you could be faced with a massive bill.

Verdict;-Not worth the paper it is written on

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Please take a look at buythishere .com : LK03EGF

 

It will give you an idea of the type of people that you are dealing with at Hyundai UK.

 

LK03EGF was very badly damaged in a car accident, the After Sales Manager was over the drink drive limit and pleaded GUILTY.

The car was then rebuilt with costs of rebuilding being put to other cars in the accounts, LK03EGF was then auctioned through a trader to hide its history.

 

Two senior directors know about this but seem to be unwilling to assist in helping with this complaint.

 

 

By

 

Colin Foxley

 

 

I have paperwork to back up all the claims that I have made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 years later...
Please take a look at buythishere .com : LK03EGF

 

It will give you an idea of the type of people that you are dealing with at Hyundai UK.

 

LK03EGF was very badly damaged in a car accident, the After Sales Manager was over the drink drive limit and pleaded GUILTY.

The car was then rebuilt with costs of rebuilding being put to other cars in the accounts, LK03EGF was then auctioned through a trader to hide its history.

 

Two senior directors know about this but seem to be unwilling to assist in helping with this complaint.

 

 

By

 

Colin Foxley

 

 

I have paperwork to back up all the claims that I have made.

 

Hi everybody,

 

I'm about to spend £7,000 of my wife's money on a 2013 Hyundai i30 for her and whenever I phone the various car dealers they (vast majority) claim that the car I am inquiring about is still under the 5 year Hyundai guarantee. When I question the validity of this 'deal' regarding the strict criteria that have to be followed in order for the 5 year deal to be enforceable (I believe it's things like genuine Hyundai parts to be used for the services, etc) and do they offer a warranty, they say that they don't because of the Hyundai 5 year deal.

Any thoughts, please?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...