Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • The digital bank has introduced three new plans - Extra, Perks and Max - replacing its existing Plus and Premium plans for new customers.View the full article
    • Agree it is not a modification that needs to be disclosed to Insurers as changing the seats has not changed the risk.  
    • Frpm David Frost and Robert Jenrick: 'Conservatives must show we respect the votes in 2016 and 2019 and not give the Opposition the chance to undo the benefits of leaving the EU'   Sweep away the Brexit gloom – or Labour will unravel a huge gain ARCHIVE.PH archived 22 Apr 2024 05:47:50 UTC  
    • Please please help we were miss sold full fibre by EE July 22  Install couldn’t go ahead no equipment sent and no. Survey it was hell  foind out no full fibre in road so we had to go back to cooper no choice we involved. Ceo and they put in a man from customer resolution s  he was vile he told me I had to go to engineers  something very odd about the ex resolution s in bt basically they took my drive up said they Would put ducting in ready for full fibre we have got £ 40 for a hours upon hours phones stress and more told to go to ombudsman  then bill was £35 we called twice told it was that price as they had treated us appalling two weeks later all sky package gets pulled we call again our bill goes to 165 the next two weeks was hell trying to get yo bottom why it’s off our package it was all on in the end I spent a day on the phone  341 mins was the call anyway I got to the bottom it was this resolution man coveting up the other issue another deadlock  to cover it all up  they hide data  ee did so couldn’t get the miss sell in writing I have now only from sept  Basically now we tried getting full fibre and they have found my drive had to be taken up again which has sunk .  The engineer has placed the wrong ducting again under my drive and need s to be taken to again apparently and the pipe sticks up middle of the drive near gate not behind look so odd it’s a big as a drain pipe open to water and it’s below touching the electrical cables to hot tub . I was sent a letter from the ex resolution to say I had stopped the work  I haven’t  it’s so sadistic she covering up for her mate in that team as the orginal install he didn’t check it had been done correctly  I took to Twitter and posted on open reach they ignored me then after 3 calls of two weeks they sent a engineer bt ignored me ceo emails blocked tag on Twitter unanswered then we get someone from twitter send a engineer he written report to say it’s dangerous since we have  had a  letter to say our problem can not be resolved  then a email to say sorry we are leaving and we can’t get into our account Bt will not talk to us ofcom tells us nothing they can do Citzens advice said go to the police  we can’t go back to virgin due so mass issue with them only option is sky  but point is they make out we have canceled we haven’t we have this mess on our drive dangeous work we are in hell  it’s like she covering up for this collegue it’s all very odd I am disabled and they like played mentaly with me open reach say bt resolved the issue no they have not  I recon they have terminated us making our we have  to hide it from mgt  Help it’s hell I don’t sleep we have 29 may we have tried  calling they just ignore me  at first they are so lovely as they say I am then they go to nnamager and say we can’t say anything to you end call  Scared police are rubbish I need help even typing is so painfull  Thankyou  anyone hello be so grateful     
    • There's a thread somewhere about someone sending the baillifs against Wizzair that is quite hilarious. I would love to see someone do the same to Ryanair. Question is, should you be the one to take that role. You are entitled to the £220, if your flight was from the UK. If it was TO the UK I suppose it is more of a grey area... though the airlines I know have been using £220 as standard. Not that surprising for Ryanair, the worst cheapskates in the universe, to go for the lower amount, and if you forward this to the CEO he will probably have a jolly good laugh and give his accountants a verbal bonus. After all he's the one who said and I paraphrase "F*** our customers, they'll fly with us again anyway". While we would all love to see Ryanair get wooped in court again, I have to join my fellow posters in thinking it's not worth the hassle for (hypothetically) £7 and not sure it will expedite the payment either. It's already an achievement that you got them to accept to pay.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Tesco Home Insurance - Won't Pay Up !


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4528 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

OVER three months ago I purchased a metal shed and paid for it to be erected. A couple of days after erection it blew down in a gale. I sent in a claim to TESCO INSURANCE for the cost of the shed plus labour costs to be reimbursed. I also sent in my labourers reciept for the work as requested. The total came to approx £1000. This was a straight forward claim and I was well within the provisions of the policy to be reimbursed. However, to date I have had nothing but excuse after excuse from TESCO for not dealing with my claim. I provided them with the reciept from the builder which they said they required otherwise the claim could not be processed. Yet when I spoke with a lady on their switchboard she stated that the labourer involved could not be contacted because the line had gone dead so they must have gone out of business. She said this was why they couldn't refund me. This is pure fabrication as I contacted the builder myself and spoke to him. His mobile and home phone are in perfect working order and also his fax. I have provided Tesco from the begining with all of these contact details. There should be no problem.:o

When I spoke to the builder he stated that Tesco had indeed been in contact with him ONCE about a month ago but that he has heard nothing since. I have also spoken with another person on the TESCO switchboard who said yesterday that my claim would be dealt with immediately once I had forwarded the invoice for the purchase of the shed. I had the company I bought the shed from fax a copy of the receipt immediately direct to TESCO - STILL THEY WILL NOT PAY ME ! :mad: Additionally I have asked on three seperate occasions for a replacement copy of my policy schedule which I have mislaid. I have been assured each time I requested it that the literature had been sent, yet I am still waiting many weeks later, Could there be some reason why TESCO don't wish me to have the details within the policy I have paid for and why they keep delaying settlement of the claim which I am fully entitled to ?

This whole thing worrys me greatly, as TESCO INSURANCE is supposed to protect MY WHOLE HOUSE AND CONTENTS If something really major happens to my property I am in fear of losing everything I possess and TESCO refusing to pay a penny ! Please help !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well this happened a lot when I worked at Direct Line - which was at the time that Tesco, Churchill etc were conglomerated into RBS Insurance. The problem is that the branding went well, but the left hand didn't bothe telling the right hand what was going on (and it seemed to me that the left hand didn't know what was going on either). It left a complete mess. Valuers were told that all documents were to be sent to one place, so advisors, scattered throughout the country in various call centres (and still maintaining their own brand) could not access them.

 

Time to get onto the FOS I would say. Tesco should have already logged a complaint (bet they haven't so write in with one anyway and include copies of all documents to shut them up). If no satisfactory response is received then it's FOS time.

 

Seems like they have not learned their lessons yet.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much Gyzmo :) Looks like you really know your stuff ! I will send in all details to the FOS. Trouble is I think I've lost the builders reciept after all this time so I hope he can supply another one. I will certainly keep you informed on what happens !! Fingers crossed eh ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Before you go to the FOS you must first exhaust Tescos coplaints procedure (if you havent done so already, you need to lodge a formal complaint and wait either for a final response or for the deadlines to pass without receiving communication). The FOS will not enter into a complaint otherwise.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the paper today a woman had her roof blow off in a gale but Tesco said that the wind was 9 miles per hour less than there policy stated, obviously they are refusing to pay, be nice to know how they can say how fast the wind was at the time, must have detectors on all policy holders roofs

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like they're returning to their bad old ways when it was just Direct Line (refusing claims on the slightest technicality, refusing to pay claims, chasing thid parties regardless of fault etc). Someone shoudl show hese people the FOS handbook

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, Gyzmo. I did send in a complaint ( 27th Feb ) to the managing director, a Mr Sullivan. Naturally he didn't bother to reply himself. I received one of those, "we are looking into the matter" standard

replies. I could be waiting forever though whilst they "look into it " It is patently obvious by now that they have absolutely no intention of doing any such thing ! I really am tired of the whole beaurocratic system that places companies like these in such power. :mad: These people know they have the upper hand. Recently I saw a watchdog programme they were exposing British Gas for ripping off people with their boiler protection scheme. ( Y'know, the advert where everone is dressed up like eskimos in a freezing house ! ) Apparently many people are left absolutely ages for their boiler breakdowns to be seen to, some as long as a YEAR ! Some service ,eh !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Precisely, PGH, This is what is so very worrying.:o I live in a very exposed ultra windy location. The story you illustrate of the woman whose roof blew off is just the kind of thing I EXPECT to be insured against. This is what, after all, insurance companies exist for ! Lame excuses like " 9 miles per hour less ... " All the further make me DISTRUST - TESCO HOME INSURANCE. How I rue the day I took out insurance with these people.

Bye the way, I would really appreciate if you would let me know in what newspaper you read the article, and on what page ! Thank you, :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone advise me on the main issue which is worrying me ? That is, though I ,naturally, expect my claim to be honoured by Tesco. At the same time I very much NEED to be insured with a reliable insurance company. My question, therefore, is this, Can I open up an account with

another insurance company whilst awaiting my claim with Tesco ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here's a link to the story about the lady who had her roof claim rejected: Manningtree Every Little Gust Helps (from Gazette)

 

Can I open up an account with

another insurance company whilst awaiting my claim with Tesco

 

Yes, you can do that if you cancel the Tesco insurance first. They will still have to deal with the claim as they were on cover at the time of the incident.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone advise me on the main issue which is worrying me ? That is, though I ,naturally, expect my claim to be honoured by Tesco. At the same time I very much NEED to be insured with a reliable insurance company. My question, therefore, is this, Can I open up an account with

another insurance company whilst awaiting my claim with Tesco ?

 

 

Yes you can, but you will need to declare it to any potential insurer, and they may wish to log it as a claim to start, then remove it (and refund additional premiums if any) if the claim does not go ahead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm really grateful to you, Lemontwist for the link to that article, really useful ! It is encouraging what both you and Gyzmo say concerning opening another account with another insurance company. Whilst still in battle with TESCO. On the one hand I REALLY want to do this, on the other hand, I have a suspicion that TESCO may use my new account with an alternative company to their own advantage ! They'd find some loophole or other to hang me with :mad: I consider TESCO Such sneaky,sneaky so and so's now, I wouldn't put anything past them :o

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tesco are part of Royal Bank of Scotland Group, so if you hate them that much you're removeing at least 40% of the UK insurance market! They include Direct Line, Churchill, Privilege, NIG, UKI Partnerships (Tescos, Virgin, Prudential) and tons more (including Coutts if you've got a few million quid or so sloshing about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I'm using Internet Explorer. The functions worked fine before, as you can see with my earlier posts. I just don't understand it..... I would do a downmouthed purple smiley at this point, but I can't ! ! oh I am deprived ! : (

 

Can you still see the smileys to the right of the text-box when you create a new reply, or do they no longer appear at all?

Under the "Additional Options" section, there's a tickbox saying "Disable smilies in text" - could you have clicked that by accident?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, indeed, I can still see the smilies to the right of the text box, and the 'Disable smilies in text function under additional options is left unclicked. I have checked and double checked all the available settings. All still remains a mystery ! Non functioning smilies, not exactly the worst problem in the world, I suppose : ) but all the same, frustrating ... : ( I notice, incidently that under 'posting rules ' it says ' you may not post attachments ' and also the HTML code is off, but I don't think this should affect the rest of the functions, should it ?? ....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think my settings are the same as yours:

 

Posting Rules You may post new threads

You may post replies

You may not post attachments

You may edit your posts

vB code is On

Smilies are On

code is On

HTML code is Off

Trackbacks are On

Pingbacks are On

Refbacks are On

 

 

 

I'm not really sure what to suggest. It might be best to PM one of the site admins, as they should have a more in-depth understanding of how the forum software works.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for delay in reply.... Just to say thank you, LemonT, for all your support regards my misbehaving smilies, much appreciated even if we haven't resolved the issue. I will no doubt contact an administrator at some point but right now I'm bit bogged down with other probs ! ..... oh well ( :

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Hi All,

 

Not sure if this is right place to post this but here goes.

I have Tesco Home and Contents insurance. and have had so for many years.

Back in September this year we were removing a divan bed base from our bungalow when it was caught by the wind and thrown crashing against our elderly neighbors car. The base dented his bonnet badly. As we are coverd for liability under the terms of our insurance, we contacted tesco home claims straight away.

We explained that it was fairly windy but we had to get the old bed out as a new one was being deliverd. as we have a small bungalow there was no room to put the old bed in.

We explained that it is a shared drive and the neighbors door is facing ours and that his car was parked outside of his door, we explained also that he had just come out of hospital and was seriously ill so his car could not be moved. he is 87 years old and had technicaly died the week before but had been recussitated.

 

We got an estimate for the replacment bonnet as that is what our neighbor insisted on as the old one had been creased. it is a 4 year old car.

tesco eventualy told us that the neighbor should have claimed on his car insurance. we explained that he did not want the hassle of this as he waas very poorly and in any case it was our fault, he was not even in his car at the time. We can not make him claim if he does not want to do so.

They refused th calim in the end, they said we were not liable for the damage. that id a laugh!! who is liable then? They said he should have gone through his motor insurance and done it properly. We said, " we can not make him do that"!.

They said liability was not proven so basicaly tuff!!

 

We paid the bill which was £800.00 out of our own pocket.

 

 

I have written to complaint against the decision but so far have had no responce. I have sent them a copy of the invoice which we paid.

 

Any one think we are not liable because FOS think we should claim against Tesco if they do not pay up. How were we to know the wind would snatch the bed from our hands. What if that had of been some thing like a roof tile blowing off and damaging his car, what is the difference?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...