Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Your page numbers should run through your WX and exhibits so im concerned its page x of 9.
    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

UNPLANNED O/D FEES HELP(I'm from poland)


papdzan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5845 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I was in Poland recently and how I came back found letters from Lloyds TSB that they counted up me punishment. But I now that this punishmant is counted up when I have overdraf but may account balance he was positive, +few pound and the same day I paid in money and buy something on Ebay. But now (today) I checked my statement and I see that first I paid in money next bank he took 75Ł(unplanned o/d fees) but in the same day i buy and first check how much money I have. and I see now that bank he took me cash but transaction purshase she was realized 2 days later.I dont know what I must do now because I had not overdraf and I do not it intention to pay. What I can make because I do not want to have problems. I ask to write comprehensibly because I find more topic about this problem but I don't understand all. I think that this is different case because I had not overdraf:o

 

Thanks a lot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your case is no different to others. The bank have taken out charges on the day you deposited money to purchase goods from e-bay which will result in further charges.

The best plan for you would be to contact the bank and ask for the charges to be returned as when you bought the product from e-bay you made sure funds were available. Did the bank notify you in writing that the charges were to come out of your account on that day?

Link to post
Share on other sites

He sended information that (You asked us to make a number of payments for you on 5th march 2008.we wanted to let you know that unfortunetly there was enough money in your accountto cover all of them.we have provided you with an unplanned overdraft to cover the payments we made) but why bank he took me 75Ł in the same day when I paid in cash in my account but i had money it was not debt.And when Paypal system he took mpney from my account (5th march) I had not already enough money.Bank sended me second message(letter)it seems me that reprimand.I think that bank he should to take this money when I would have debt but I had not. :confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Really sorry but I cant quite understand exactly whats happened here but I would advise you to contact your bank and discuss this with them at the branch if possible, they have the ability to refund those charges.

 

 

If im right in reading this you are saying on the 5th March you paid in cash to cover these payments yet the bank are saying there was insufficient funds available and provided you with a temp overdraft then charged you £75 for it.

 

If so do you still have the payment slip when you deposited cash in that day, if so take this with you when you go to the bank.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my statement ....look

 

 

Date Payment type Details Paid out Paid in Balance

 

14feb DEB Asda 1.40 3.20

 

25feb DEB Asda 1.38 1.91

 

3mar DEB payment 140

 

3mar CHG Unplanned 75.00 66.91

 

5mar DEB paypal 139.83 72.92DR

Link to post
Share on other sites

In january a had 2 pound debt because i buy something but I did't know how much money I have. Sended me information about this debt and I paid in 30Ł and they returned me these 2Ł and Ihad balance 28Ł.Possible that about this.If so what I can make:(

Link to post
Share on other sites

I go to the bank tomorrow but whot I mus to take with me(what documents)

whether I have to take with me confirmation purchace on ebay and that paymant in paypal?I have yet payment slip but what have payment slip when I deposited cash in that day?because I don"t understand all?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again. I was there yesterday and they said that me this annul but I have yet debt.I have go there once again? maybe I don't know mayby a bit this lasts? If I make a mistake ....improvements me. Thanks a lot for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...