Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Not prosecuting in the public interest seems to be bandied about on forums frequented by students. I don't think I've ever seen a prosecution not go ahead because of that. You would have to define why it isn't in the public interest to prosecute someone who isn't paying their way and is costing other travellers more. I can't think of a reason. HB
    • we have known for a very very long time that 9/10 the OC never knows IRRWW are chasing debtors nor  in some cases even taking money from them that the OC never ever see!! IDRWW pockets it -  free money - lets all go on a staff holiday. there was an article some years back whereby that quoted some +£4M debtors had paid to IDRWW on UAE debts that when contacted the originating banks knew nothing about....😎  
    • let the ombudsman do their job. you'll win handsdown you dont obv owe OVO p'haps anything at all.  dont worry about Past Due credit or any other DCA ( THEY ARE NOT BAILIFFS!) as for you being added to the debt, thats quite OK, you were a resident adult and equally liable under law. once you start getting things moving via the  ombudsman dont forget to get your credit files cleansed of any negative data & seek compensation for distress etc, again the  ombudsman should sort both out for you. as you are now NOT a customer of OVO, there is very very little they can do to you now.  
    • A question - did you use the supermarket or the restaurant? I see the restrictions are different. Sign.pdf
    • DN is ok DCA NOA is ok, though not one from Newday saying they've sold it. agreement states esigned on a sunday at 11am?? really??  but no typed names or tick box nor any IP address used. if the date is correct then poss ok, it that your correct address for that time of take out? but if not, then that could simply be a copy of someone elses they've used with you details copy'n'pasted over theirs. the agreement details separate T&C's in at least 8.4. a full set of T&C containing your correct address for the time MUST be included. failure renders the agreement unenforceable... have you the T&C's too? dx
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Insure & Go Travel insurance claim


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5195 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I hope someone can give me some advice. I recently went on a snowboarding holiday and broke my arm on the 2nd day Doh!. All well

and good I thought as I had taken travel insurnace out so kept all reciepts

and medical notes etc.

 

On returning I sent off my claim to Insure & Go (Travel Claim Services) for the taxi to and from the hospital and also the invoice for the package holiday I had paid for to get reimbursement for the Ski Lessons, Ski Hire and Lift pass which I had not got to use for the remaining 5 days of the holiday all of which are clearly covered in the T&C's of the insurance.

 

I have since recieved a letter form the insurer refusing to make any payment on my claim as I have not supplied a breakdown of the individual costs of each aspect of the holiday. I don't have this as the holiday was bought as an all inclusive holiday, so i have contacted the holiday provider to request this information but they can't/won't supply a breakdown as it would seem they purchase the lessons/lift pass/ski hire on bulk for the season so can't breakdown the cost to an individual basis.

 

Are the insurance company in the right in refusing to make any payment due to this?, even though within the price I paid for the holiday are items which are covered by the insurance I took out.

 

I have been advised to go down the small claims court route to try and get a settlement but would like any advice good or bad on whether it would be worthwhile.

 

Thanks and Happy Easter

 

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would have thought they can easily divide the total of the holiday by the amounts of days wasted and pay back pro-rata, so it seems very unreasonable. Furthermore, even if they had grounds to refuse thispart of the claim, if you have your receipts for the additional expenses, taxis etc, I fail to see how they could refuse to pay that.

 

You should write back and try to get them to see reason, but if they refuse, tell them you want them to tell you it is their final decision so you can take it to the FOS.

 

I tried to check your insurance T&Cs, but there are a few policies under skiing/snowboarding, so can you tell us which one it was so I can check it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for your response you have confirmed what I thought that they are being unreasonable and trying it on, I shall respond to them again next week as suggested and try to make them see sense. I'm awaiting a call from a manager there on tuesday so shall see what comes of that as well. The policy I have is on the following link

http://www.insureandgo.com/travel-insurance/downloads/Standard-Policy-Wording.pdf

 

it is the silver cover and includes the ski/snowboard cover.

 

Again thanks for the advice.

 

Chris

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
  • 1 year later...

Hi,

Insure and Go are the worst travel insurance company I've ever dealt with. I had an accident in Austria back in February 2008 and to date the Austrian hospital is chasing for payment, despite me forwarding the invoice to Insure and Go. I called them several times during the last two years and they always reassure me that they will pay it and sort it out. Now the hospital is suing me if I don't pay within 14 days. Again, Insure and Go are now claiming that they have never received the invoice, however, I have proof as I kept all the emails. I don't know anymore what I shall do? Should I go to a lawyer? I hope some people read this. I don't tend to blog but this really is so upsetting and I don't want anyone to have to go through that. If you can, avoid Insure and Go AT ALL costs. It is not worth it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...