Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm still pondering/ trying to find docs re the above issue. Moving on - same saga; different issue I'm trying to understand what I can do: The lender/ mortgagee-in-possession has a claim v me for alleged debt. But the debt has only been incurred due to them failing to sell property in >5y. I'm fighting them on this.   I've been trying to get an order for sale for 2y.  I got it legally added into my counterclaim - but that will only be dealt with at trial.  This is really frustrating. The otherside's lawyers made an application to adjourn trial for a few more months - allegedly wanting to try sort some kind of settlement with me and to use the stay to sell.  At the hearing I asked Judge to expedite the order for sale. I pointed out they need a court-imposed deadline or this adjournment is just another time wasting tactic (with interest still accruing) as they have no buyer.  But the judge said he could legally only deal with the order at trial. The otherside don't want to be forced to sell the property.. Disclosure has presented so many emails which prove they want to keep it. I raised some points with the judge including misconduct of the receiver. The judge suggested I may have a separate claim against the receiver?   On this point - earlier paid-for lawyers said my counterclaim should be directed at the lender for interference with the receiver and the lender should be held responsible for the receiver's actions/ inactions.   I don't clearly understand that, but their legal advice was something to do with the role a receiver has acting as an agent for a borrower which makes it hard for a borrower to make a claim against a receiver ???.  However the judge's comment has got me thinking.  He made it clear the current claim is lender v me - it's not receiver v me.  Yet it is the receiver who is appointed to sell the property. (The receiver is mentioned/ involved in my counterclaim only from the lender collusion/ interference perspective).  So would I be able to make a separate application for an order for sale against the receiver?  Disclosure shows receiver has constantly rejected offers. He gave a contract to one buyer 4y ago. But colluded with the lender's lawyer to withdraw the contract after 2w to instead give it to the ceo of the lender (his own ltd co) (using same lawyer).  Emails show it was their joint strategy for lender/ ceo to keep the property.  The receiver didn't put the ceo under any pressure to exchange quickly.  After 1 month they all colluded again to follow a very destructive path - to gut the property.  My account was apparently switched into a "different fund" to "enable them to do works" (probably something to do with the ceo as he switched his ltd co accountant to in-house).   Interestingly the receiver told lender not to incur significant works costs and to hold interest.  The costs were huge (added to my account) and interest was not held.   The receiver rejected a good offer put forward by me 1.5y ago.  And he rejected a high offer 1y ago - to the dismay of the agent.  Would reasons like this be good enough to make a separate application to the court against the receiver for an order for sale ??  Or due to the main proceedings and/or the weird relationship a borrower has with a receiver I cannot ?
    • so a new powerless B2B debt DCA set up less than a month ago with a 99% success rate... operating on a NWNF basis , but charging £30 to set up your use of them. that's gonna last 5mins.... = SPAMMERS AND SCAMMERS. a DCA is NOT a BAILIFF and have  ZERO legal powers on ANY debt - no matter WHAT its type. dx      
    • Migrants are caught in China's manufacturing battles with the West, as Beijing tries to save its economy.View the full article
    • You could send an SAR to DCbl on the pretext that you are going for a breach of your GDPR . They should then send the purported letter of discontinuance which may show why it ended up in Gloucester and see if you can get your  costs back on the day. It obviously won't be much but  at least perhaps a small recompense for your wasted day. Not exactly wasted since you had a great win  albeit much sweeter if you had beat them in Court. But a win is a win so well done. We will miss you as it has been almost two years since you first started out on this mission. { I would n't be surprised if the wrong Court was down to DCBL}. I see you said "till the next time" but I am guessing you will be avoiding private patrolled car parks for a while.🙂
    • It is extremely disappointing that you haven't told us anything about the result of the hearing. You came here at the very last minute and the regulars - all unpaid volunteers - sweated blood trying to get an acceptable Witness Statement prepared in an extremely short time. The least you could have done is tell us how the hearing went, information invaluable for future users. Evidently not.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

DLA overpayment


pauld56
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5864 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all

Wonder if anyone can help, I was informed in October 2007 that I was to be interviewed under caution by the DWP for not informing them to a change in circumstances. I had been recieving DLA Mobility High rate since 1995, and used the DLA to get a car on the Motability scheme. I was interviewed by DWP Fraud investigators and shown a witness statement taken from my Line Manager who was asked basic questions about me ie my work pattern and duties. I am a line manager and my job is clerical, I walk very short distances around the office. I was also shown a video taken of me at my place of work, this video shows me leaving the building to go for a "fag break" again a short distance. Also on the video it showed me on a shopping trip with my sons into the city, they claimed I walked about 2 miles or about 2 hours without a break. However the video was edited in fact the total lenth of the video is 55 mins.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Wonder if anyone can help, I was informed in October 2007 that I was to be interviewed under caution by the DWP for not informing them to a change in circumstances. I had been recieving DLA Mobility High rate since 1995, and used the DLA to get a car on the Motability scheme. I was interviewed by DWP Fraud investigators and shown a witness statement taken from my Line Manager who was asked basic questions about me ie my work pattern and duties. I am a line manager and my job is clerical, I walk very short distances around the office. I was also shown a video taken of me at my place of work, this video shows me leaving the building to go for a "fag break" again a short distance. Also on the video it showed me on a shopping trip with my sons into the city, they claimed I walked about 2 miles or about 2 hours without a break. However the video was edited in fact the total lenth of the video is 55 mins. After the interview i was informed in the December 2007 that my DLA was stopped and the overpayment was to go back to October 2006 on the evidence of another witness who claims to have seen me shopping in a local supermarket about a year ago !! I am still waiting to hear from the DWP of any other action ie Criminal action, caution, the interview was some 5 months ago now. Any advice/comments would be most welcomed. Sorry its a bit long winded.........Pauld56

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know, what have they told you about rights to appeal and stuff?

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know, what have they told you about rights to appeal and stuff?

Just the normal thing I have the right to appeal, and to supply any new evidence to support the appeal, but I'm stuck as still do not know what follow up the DWP are to do apart from the overpayment. Has any one else bee in this situation ? thanks for the reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right Paul time for action. YOu want to send a SAR specifically asking for the tape they showed you plus anything else they have on your file (advice on preparing a SAR is in the letters area but if you need help just shout).

 

When you get your info back you need to sit and highlight anything that is wrong or misguiding.

 

With the tape sit and watch it and write down stuff like "start - 5 mins 01/01/07 0900, at work. Walked X meters to take a cigarette break. 5 mins - 10 mins 01/02/07 noon, at Tesco. Walked X meters to collect essential items of shopping. Rested for Y time." Sounds daft but it's to show that the tape has been highly edited.

 

Get onto your doctor or consultant or both and request a report on your medical condition.

 

If you have a carer (this can be your wife, kids, a neighbour or someone you employ to be carer) get them to write a statement saying in which ways you need cared for and how often.

 

Add in anything else you think is relevant, can you use public transport? Can you cook a meal for yourself? What happens if you walk too far without rest?

 

Photocopy it all, send a copy away with a letter saying you want to appeal and hope for the best. If it goes to tribunal don't panic, lots of claims are dealt with at tribunal and they tend to favour the disabled person.

 

If you need any more help just give a shout or try PM bookworm who is well clued up on this stuff.

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always understood to get the mobility component of Disability Living Allowance, your disability must be severe enough for you to have the following walking difficulties, even when wearing or using an aid or equipment you normally use:

  • you are unable or virtually unable to walk, or you have no feet or legs, or
  • you are assessed to be both 100% disabled because of loss of eyesight and not less than 80% disabled because of deafness and you need someone with you when you are out of doors, or
  • you are severely mentally impaired with severe behavioural problems and qualify for the highest rate of care component, or
  • the effort of walking could threaten your life or seriously affect your health, or
  • you need guidance and/or supervision from another person when walking out of doors in unfamiliar places

The DWP probably believe that because you can walk short distances around the office and you do not need guidance or supervision, that you have exagerated your claim and were never entitled to the high rate or any rate at all. Did you not realise from the DLA claim pack/guidance notes and letters that you may have been receiving the incorrect level of benefit?

Link to post
Share on other sites

what we've got to remember is that sometimes people walk because they have no choice but they do so with considerable discomfort or pain. They can also walk in a specific manner; slowly, taking breaks, leaning on something, getting breathless etc. So the fact that you walked is not the indicator that you do not qualify for higher mob component; it's the effect of walking on your health, the manner of walking, the discomfort and pain it has caused, the distance, the time, the speed.

Do you have assistance from any advice agency/solicitor?

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Joa

Thank you for the reply I have seen the CAB and there dealing with the overpayment, but as for legal advice No I did seek advice and take a solictor with me to the interview under caution in October 2007 but he just sat there and said nothing and his advice to me afterwards was "Wait and see what happens" and as to date I still don't know what if any action by DWP Fraud are to take is this normal to wait so long before they decide if to take action ? Thanks again

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not at all I had a Benefits doctor come to my home and he agreed that I should get DLA High rate mobility also my own GP and hospital consultant agreed I was awarded the DLA in 1995 I have been in my job since 2001 as I under the impression you are allowed to work while getting DLA, just as a after note since my DLA was stopped my condition as deterated and is starting to effect my Attendance at work, I am also back on Morphine Sulphate for pain a strong pain killer I was able to come off some time ago but now I am back on a high dose and in constant pain ... So if any thing the DWP are proberly going to be responsible for me having to stop work, paying taxes national insurance. I will then of course have to claim Incapacity Benefit or the new ESA allowence and of course become a burden on the tax paying people of the UK ... So who is the winner ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi

I am a bit confused have some people replied via personal message,

 

No just on here I really do need some serious advice if you can help i would be most greatful

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

subbing to this

 

hope you get it sorted

 

ive applyed for dla as i have 2 torn discs in me back

l4/l5 they thought it wa syatica at first and i cant walk properly or for long

applyed 6 weeks ago and still nothing

im on morphine as well 3 60mg a day and oramorph for wen i need a pain relife boost also gabapentin 3 300mg

to sort the pain and numbness in me leg

 

any way hope you get sorted soon m8

Link to post
Share on other sites

the applications take ages to go through DCG so don't be surprised if something comes through your door in the next 3 or 4 weeks. If you want you can call up and ask for the status of your application.

Any posts submitted here on the Consumer Action Group under the user name GlasweJen may not necessarily be the view of the poster, CAG or indeed any normal person.

 

I've become addicted to green blobs (I have 2 now) so feel free to tip my scales if I ever make sense.;-)

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

subbing to this

 

hope you get it sorted

 

ive applyed for dla as i have 2 torn discs in me back

l4/l5 they thought it wa syatica at first and i cant walk properly or for long

applyed 6 weeks ago and still nothing

im on morphine as well 3 60mg a day and oramorph for wen i need a pain relife boost also gabapentin 3 300mg

to sort the pain and numbness in me leg

 

any way hope you get sorted soon m8

Hi DCG

Just an update I got a summons to attened the Magistrates Court on the 11/April/207 to face a charge under section 112 (1A) of the Social Security Administration Act 1992 mainly that between 11 October 2006 and 09 October 2007 at my home address that I the defendant with a view to obtaining for himself Disability Living Allowence failed to notify a change in circumstances whicj was required to notify,namely that his capabilities and mobility had increased contrary to the section. The date they are going back too is based not on medical evidence as I have a letter from my GP stating that in the last 10 years there has been no improvement or is there likely to be no improvement in the future. But on the evidence of someone who hardly knows me only by sight, that they "Saw me about a year ago shopping and I looked as if I wasn't in pain" the shopping by the way was a newspaper (The Sun) so from start to finish this has taken 5 months from Interview under caution to a summons....Any advice ? Have you had any progress on your claim to DLA ? also as a foot note my medacation has been increased for the pain I'm in since losing my car and having to travel to work on public transport this journey now takes over 1 hour so I have to take stronger Morphine Sulthate and of course the effects that has on me .... Best regards to all Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 threads merged, please keep to 1 thread per story, it's easier to follow that way.

 

 

Well, I think that you need to get as much of help from your GP as you can: Get him to list the medications you're on, with the dates they have been prescribed, the increases in dosages etc, everything that shows that to cope with the same condition, you have to resort to higher pain control methods. Get him to write a letter in layman's terms clearly stating that the whole claim is absurd as you have a condition which can not physically get better unless someone believes in miracles.

 

You'll want to challenge the witness statement, obviously: How does the witness know you weren't in pain? Is he/she a pain specialist? Does he know how much medication you were on at the time? How long did he see you for? How was he able to ascertain how much discomfort you were experiencing from seeing you there? Does he know what your pain thresholds are and how you express them?

 

At the risk of sounding awful, on the day of the tribunal, do not take any medication unless absolutely necessary and even then as little as you can to function. You want the judge to see exactly what it means for you having what you have and dealing with it the way you do. If it means at some point things will have to stop because you can't cope, well, maybe that will make the point across more clearly than anything else would.

 

You need letters or witnesses to testify how much help you get on a day-to-day basis, to document how bad things are. If you have someone who comes in to help caring, whether be a cleaner or a carer, social services or whatever, get them to write detailing it too.

 

One thing to note is that the charge is failing to notify of a change in circumstances, so you need to concentrate on showing that they haven't, and if they have, they have got worse, not better.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...