Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Paragraph 18 – you are still talking about Boston stolen items. About time this was fixed??? Paragraph 19  In any event, the claimant's PS5 gaming device was correctly declared and correctly valued. The defendant accepted it for carriage and was even prepared to earn extra money by selling sell insurance in case of its loss or damage. New paragraph 20 – this the defendant routinely sells insurance in respect of "no compensation" items (a secondary contract contrary to section 72 CRA 2015) new paragraph above paragraph 20 – the defendant purports to limit its liability in respect of lost or damaged items. This is contrary to section 57 of the consumer rights act 2015. The defendant offers to extend their liability if their customer purchases an insurance cover for an extra sum of money. This insurance is a secondary contract calculated to exclude or limit their liability for the defendants contractual breaches and is contrary to section 72 of the consumer rights act 2015. New paragraph below paragraph 42 – the defendant merely relies on "standard industry practice" You haven't pointed to the place in your bundle of the Telegraph newspaper extract. You have to jiggle the paragraphs around. Even though I have suggested new paragraph numbers, the order I have suggested is on your existing version 5. You will have to work it out for your next version. Good luck!   Let's see version 6 Separately, would you be kind enough to send me an unredacted to me at our admin email address.
    • UK travellers have been turned away at airports because their passports are not valid for EU travel.View the full article
    • i think theres been MORE than amble evidence of that and am astonished that criminal proceedings haven't begun.
    • Yep, those 'requirements' not met to shareholders satisfaction seem to me to be: 1. Not being allowed to increase customer bills by 40% (of which well over 50% of the new total would NOT be investment) 2. 1 plus regulators not agreeing to letting them do 'things in their own time (ie carry on regardless)
    • As already mentioned freely available "credit scores" are fairly useless. All lenders have their own "credit scoring" system, that for obvious reasons they don't divulge. And they're "scored" differently to the freely available ones. As soon as they could, we've always encouraged our two children to use credit cards responsibly... Pay off in full, etc, to generate good history. It's paid off. At quite young ages, they have both obtained loans for cars, mortgage and their credit card limits are through the roof. Personally, I have shifted debt around a lot on credit cards (even financed a house purchase once at 0% 😉) and I've only ever been refused a credit card once, sorry twice by the same company, over many years. They must have something very different in their lending criteria. You're a tight one, Mr Branson.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 160 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My partner debt before she met me - how will this effect me


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5861 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

My partner moved in with me in january this year and Red debt collection Services working on behalf of Lowell portfolio 1 LTD have sent a letter to my address. The origional creditor was with t mobile who are claiming she owes over £1000 from around 3 years ago (there is an email address for tmobile but there are 3 companies mentioned).

 

The letter states that if my partner doesnt get in touch a licensed home visit agent will attend my home and legal proceedings will commence with the aim of balifs if they get a court order.

 

Now i met my partner last year in july and i do not have anything to do with this debt as it is 3 years ago; i didnt even know my partner then.

 

How does the law stand in relation to my assets, which i can prove i have paid for everything in my flat and my partner and child are not on the tenancy agreement.

 

Another area of concern is that i am disabled and unable to work and my partner is my carer. I really could do without this hasle, and am in the process of trying to find alternative accomodation.

 

My partner has other creditors, who have not located her yet

 

I have not responded to their letter either verbal or writtern.

 

What i want to know is can they take any of my assets, now and if no and we get married in the future, have they the right to claim my property in my flat.

 

Thirdy if my partner has to do a capital expenditure calculation and we are at the moment claiming as a couple. does all the income we recieve have to be declared?????? how does it work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What i want to know is can they take any of my assets, now and if no and we get married in the future, have they the right to claim my property in my flat.

The answer to this is quite simply NO.

 

Debt collectors have no more legal power than the milkman, if you got into arrears with the milk bill would the milkman come and do a repossession ? I think not!

 

And regardless of whether or not you get married these debts are in your partners sole name and remain her responsibility no matter what some DCA tries to fob you off with. A licensed home visit agent is nothing more than a posh name for a debt collector.

 

If my partner has to do a capital expenditure calculation and we are at the moment claiming as a couple. does all the income we recieve have to be declared??????

Absolutely not. As previously stated regardless of whether or not you're married if a debt's in your partners sole name, it's her sole responsibility and your income doesn't enter the equation.

 

Have you considered contacting National Debtline or the Consumer Credit Counselling Service, their advice is second to none and free, they are both registered charities..

 

National Debtline, for FREE CONFIDENTIAL and INDEPENDENT ADVICE call 0808 808 4000

 

CCCS - Free Debt Advice from the UK's Leading Debt Charity

 

Good luck & best wishes, Dave.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not agree.

 

Income of both parties does need to be declared as your partners income is obviously assisting towards the bills. You can hardly claim that 100% of all bills and expenditure are met by you and she does not pay anything towards any of them.

 

CAB income/expenditure forms always quote total income and they are the experts in these matters!!!

 

Hope that makes sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Have you considered contacting National Debtline or the Consumer Credit Counselling Service, their advice is second to none and free, they are both registered charities..

 

National Debtline, for FREE CONFIDENTIAL and INDEPENDENT ADVICE call 0808 808 4000

 

CCCS - Free Debt Advice from the UK's Leading Debt Charity

 

Good luck & best wishes, Dave.

 

As Dave has said, it is worth contacting the above charities. They will assist with the expenditure sheet. They will help your partner to work out a repayment plan for her debts that she can afford, if that's what she wants to do. If what she can afford is £1 per month, then so be it. I am assuming, but may be wrong, that you receive benefits which they will not be entitled to either.

 

Regardless of who owns what, no DCA is entitled to enter your property without being invited. They will say such things to intimidate and pressure people.

 

Let us know how you get on.

 

Best wishes ;)

I'm midway through the tunnel, but getting closer to the light.

 

 

 

Please be aware that i am not an expert in anything!

I may offer an opinion, but the final decision is yours.

Link to post
Share on other sites

CAB income/expenditure forms always quote total income and they are the experts in these matters!!!

 

 

I did not find that to be the case. One year dealing with Cab was equal to two posts worth of advice i recieved here. Mention CAB to a DCA and you dont get any response, metion CAG and the phone goes down quicker than ......insert own analogy here.

[COLOR=blue]THAMES CREDIT: STATUTE BARRED LETTER SENT [/COLOR][COLOR=red]No reply[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]HILLSDEN SECURITIES: CCA REQUESTED [/COLOR][COLOR=red]No reply[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]ROBINSON WAY: CCA REQUESTED [/COLOR][COLOR=red]In default, 30 days up 6th April[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]LOWELL: CCA REQUESTED [COLOR=red]In default 30 days up 6th April made offer for F&F - refused [/COLOR] :D [/COLOR]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that really true?

If you feel that we have helped you, or you would like to help keep this web site running so that others can continue to get their money back, please click the donate button at the top of the forum.

Advice & opinions of Dave, The Bank Action Group and The Consumer Action Group are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability.

Use your own judgment. Seek advice of a qualified insured professional if you have any doubts.

 

------------

 

 

Add me as your friend on FaceBook - I need all the friends I can get :-(

 

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=577405151

 

------------

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not agree.

 

Income of both parties does need to be declared as your partners income is obviously assisting towards the bills. You can hardly claim that 100% of all bills and expenditure are met by you and she does not pay anything towards any of them.

 

CAB income/expenditure forms always quote total income and they are the experts in these matters!!!

 

Hope that makes sense.

A debtor is solely responsible for debts in his/her own name, any new partner months/years down the line cannot be held jointly responsible even by virtue of marriage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is that really true?

 

I found i got quite biased advice from the CAB and at one point they recommended an IVA based only on the info i have provided here. CAG has the reputation whereby DCA`s do pay a lot more attention if you say you are recieving advice from them. The statistics and the posts speak for themselves. If the CAB recieved as many quieries and had as many returning customers ( for want of a better word) you wouldnt be able to get an appt till next Christmas.

[COLOR=blue]THAMES CREDIT: STATUTE BARRED LETTER SENT [/COLOR][COLOR=red]No reply[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]HILLSDEN SECURITIES: CCA REQUESTED [/COLOR][COLOR=red]No reply[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]ROBINSON WAY: CCA REQUESTED [/COLOR][COLOR=red]In default, 30 days up 6th April[/COLOR] [COLOR=#0000ff]LOWELL: CCA REQUESTED [COLOR=red]In default 30 days up 6th April made offer for F&F - refused [/COLOR] :D [/COLOR]

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have debts that go back 10 years, met my partner 7 years ago, therefore I had my debts before I even knew him.

 

CAB used to advise me, but once my daughter and i moved in with my partner, CAB said that he had to take 1/2 of the responsbility for my debts as because we shared our lives together we therefore had to share my debts, and if my partner was going to accept responsbility for my daughter then he had to accept joint responbility for my debts. :eek:

 

We did not agree with CAB and they refused to help and advise me. They would only help if my partner shared my debts that were nothing to do with him and incurred before we even knew each other. They also said that he would have to give up all his credit cards and enter into repayment programmes with them. (honestly, they did!)

 

I decided to deal with things myself. After phoning the National Debtline for help to get me started on my own, they advised me what diskmandave has posted earlier:

 

A debtor is solely responsible for debts in his/her own name, any new partner months/years down the line cannot be held jointly responsible even by virtue of marriage.

 

I do not have my name on any of the household bills and the mortgage is in my partners name only. I moved into his house.

 

Our agreement of looking after things is that we each take responsbility for our own personal finances, he pays all the house bills, I run the house, cook, clean, chase after kids etc. Works fine for us.

 

When I was required to complete Income & expenditure forms, I listed my wages, tax credits, child benefit on as my total income, and then for my expenses I listed car expenses, mobile phone expenses, food, clothing, groceries for myself and my daughter, an allowance for haircuts for myself and daughter, a small amount for unexpected payments throughout the year such as birthday presents. To deal with the fact that I lived with someone I also put into my expenses a contribution towards partners mortgage and my contribution towards household bills.

 

This was never queried (other than the usual pay more or else!). As far as I can see this showed an accurate picture of how much money I had available to pay token payments, and my partners income didn't even need to be mentioned.

 

As for bailiffs coming round, well they can't just turn up. Bailiffs would only be involved if the matter went to court and you lost and then failed to pay whatever the court instructed you to pay! (correct me if i'm wrong).

 

Hope this helps!

 

Maggieboo

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Subscribing...

 

You do not take your debt responsibilities jointly with you into a new relationship. They are yours soley, for you, and you alone, to deal with. Ignore the BS from the DCAs, they're just tryigng to scare you and CAB have given the wrong advice :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been in the same situation.

 

1st Credit said they were going to put a charge on the property which my partner solely owns - the debt is from long, long before I even knew him. They also threatened to take his car and the stuff in the house (which belongs to him) I told them they couldnt do that, to which they got shirty and said they could.

 

Thanks to all you lovely CAGgers, I discovered they couldnt, chucked that at them and also may have threatened that if they so much tried to take a thing Id have them arrested for theft. They have now crawled off with their sorry tail between thier sorry legs :D

 

Moral of the story - they cant take anything that doesnt belong to your partner!

THE PRETENDER AGENDA - August 30,2008 - 2ND ROW!!! WOO-HOO!! :-)

THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR A FAB NITE LEE! xx

Sunderland 011008 - THE BEST BIRTHDAY PRESSIE EVER! 'Aww, it's your birthday! Happy birthday darlin!'

 

02 Apr 2008, 23:55

OfficialLeeRyan wrote:

i like that!! its simple and good and gets the fans involved aswell x x x

 

MY SUCCESSES -

 

1st Credit (Lloyds TSB) admitted no CCA, reply from OFT 130608, reply from FOS 040608, adjudication stage rejected but still no contact....

 

My mate (Littlewoods/Moorcroft)

300608 -Long running battle,threatening court, CCA letter NO 2 and harrassment letter sent - passed back to Littlewoods early July.

070808 - Passed to Debt Managers, Acct in dispute/BOG OFF letter sent 080808...

140808 - Letter from Debt Managers passing debt back to Littlewoods - RESULT! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...