Thread: How the Hull was done !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your post is not very clear at all, but if I understand you right, your claim is being stayed? If it is, I am afraid there is nothing much you can do about it at the moment.

The Hull challenge was a different story altogether, and came about as a judge was about to summarily dismiss a whole pile of claims at once on the ground they had "no reasonable chance of success" following the Berwick v ltsb case, where the judge ruled against Berwick. The claimants, with the assistance of CAG, challenged the order from the Hull judge and won the right to proceed with their cases. All this happened before the OFT v Banks case started and subsequent quasi-blanket stay on all ongoing cases by county court judges.

Please explain if I misunderstood your post.

Originally Posted by seven

I see from the Comsumer Action Group the Group assited in challenging the Hull Stikeout Orders. I very interested in how this is done as I was informed by a High Court Judge in Exeter that he would not allow my application for Stike Out or allow the case to go forward as his decision was based on that of HHJ Iain Hughs QC – Heynes v HSBC & Alliance & Leicester 7QT04849. I have a claim of around £5000 which would most useful to have return. Lloyds TSB has recently closed my account and is starting court action to recover the overdraft charges they have taking from my account.

I would be most gratful for any help anyone can give me in this matter.

I think that we would be very interested to learn more about this claim that lloyds are starting against you.
Please would you start a thread about it in the Lloyds forum. Also, maybe you could let me have some contact details via one of the mods as we may be able to give you some assistance.