Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Monika the first four pages of the Private parking section have at least 12 of our members who have also been caught out on this scam site. That's around one quarter of all our current complaints. Usually we might expect two current complaints for the same park within 4 pages.  So you are in good company and have done well in appealing to McDonalds in an effort to resolve the matter without having  paid such a bunch of rogues. Most people blindly pay up. Met . Starbucks and McDonalds  are well aware of the situation and seem unwilling to make it easier for motorists to avoid getting caught. For instance, instead of photographing you, if they were honest and wanted you  to continue using their services again, they would have said "Excuse me but if you are going to go to Mc donalds from here, it will cost you £100." But no they kett quiet and are now pursuing you for probably a lot more than £100 now. They also know thst  they cannot charge anything over the amount stated on the car park signs. Their claims for £160 or £170 are unlawful yet so many pay that to avoid going to Court. When the truth is that Met are unlikely to take them to Court since they know they will lose. The PCNs are issued on airport land which is covered by Byelaws so only the driver can be pursued, not the keeper. But they keep writing to you as they do not know who was driving unless you gave it away when you appealed. Even if they know you were driving they should still lose in Court for several reasons. The reason we ask you to fill out our questionnaire is to help you if MET do decide to take you to Court in the end. Each member who visited the park may well have different experiences while there which can help when filling out a Witness statement [we will help you with that if it comes to it.] if you have thrown away the original PCN  and other paperwork you obviously haven't got a jerbil or a guinea pig as their paper makes great litter boxes for them.🙂 You can send an SAR to them to get all the information Met have on you to date. Though if you have been to several sites already, you may have done that by now. In the meantime, you will be being bombarded by illiterate debt collectors and sixth rate solicitors all threatening you with ever increasing amounts as well as being hung drawn and quartered. Their letters can all be safely ignored. On the odd chance that you may get a Letter of Claim from them just come back to us and we will get you to send a snotty letter back to them so that they know you are not happy, don't care a fig for their threats and will see them off in Court if they finally have the guts to carry on. If you do have the original PCN could you please post it up, carefully removing your name. address and car registration number but including dates and times. If not just click on the SAR to take you to the form to send to Met.
    • In order for us to help you we require the following information:- [if there are more than one defendant listed - tell us] 1 defendant   Which Court have you received the claim from ? County Court Business Centre, Northampton   Name of the Claimant ? LC Asset 2 S.A R.L   Date of issue – . 28/04/23   Particulars of Claim   What is the claim for –    (1) The Claimant ('C') claims the whole of the outstanding balance due and payable under an agreement referenced xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and opened effective from xx/xx/2017. The agreement is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974 ('CCA'), was signed by the Defendant ('D') and from which credit was extended to D.   (2) D failed to comply with a Default Notice served pursuant to s87 (1) CCA and by xx/xx/2022 a default was recorded.   (3) As at xx/xx/2022 the Defendant owed MBNA LTD the sum of 12,xxx.xx. By an agreement in writing the benefit of the debt has been legally assigned to C effective xx/xx/2022 and made regular upon C serving a Notice of Assignment upon D shortly thereafter.   (4) And C claims- 1. 12,xxx.xx 2. Interest pursuant to Section 69 County Courts Act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from xx/01/2023 to xx/04/2023 of 2xx.xx and thereafter at a daily rate of 2.52 to date of judgement or sooner payment. Date xx/xx/2023   What is the total value of the claim? 12k   Have you received prior notice of a claim being issued pursuant to paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre Action Protocol) ? Yes   Have you changed your address since the time at which the debt referred to in the claim was allegedly incurred? No   Did you inform the claimant of your change of address? N/A Is the claim for - a Bank Account (Overdraft) or credit card or loan or catalogue or mobile phone account? Credit Card   When did you enter into the original agreement before or after April 2007 ? After   Do you recall how you entered into the agreement...On line /In branch/By post ? Online   Is the debt showing on your credit reference files (Experian/Equifax /Etc...) ? Yes, but amount differs slightly   Has the claim been issued by the original creditor or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim. DP issued claim   Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? Not that I recall...   Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? Not that I recall...   Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Sums in Arrears”  or " Notice of Arrears "– at least once a year ? Yes   Why did you cease payments? Loss of employment main cause   What was the date of your last payment? Early 2021   Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? No   Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan? No   -----------------------------------
    • Hello CAG Team, I'm adding the contents of the claim to this thread, but wanted to open the thread with an urgent question: Do I have to supply a WS for a claim with a court date that states " at the hearing the court will consider allocation and, time permitting, give an early neutral evaluation of the case" ? letter is an N24 General Form of Judgement or Order, if so, then I've messed up again. Court date 25 May 2024 The letter from court does not state (like the other claims I have) that I must provide WS within 28 days.. BUT I have recently received a WS from Link for it! making me think I do need to!??
    • Massive issues from Scottish Power I wonder if someone could advise next steps. Tennant moved out I changed the electric into my name I was out the country at the time so I hadn't been to the flat. During sign up process they tried to hijack my gas supply as well which I made it clear I didn't want duel fuel from them but they still went ahead with it. Phoned them up again. a few days later telling them to make sure they stopped it but they said too late ? had to get my current supplier to cancel it. Paid £50 online to ensure there was money covering standing charges etc eventually got to the flat no power. Phoned Scottish Power 40 minutes to get through they state I have a pay as you go meter and that they had set me up on a credit account so they need to send an engineer out which they will pass my details onto. Phone called from engineer asking questions , found out the float is vacant so not an emergency so I have to speak to Scottish Power again. Spoke with the original person from Scottish Power who admitted a mistake (I had told her it was vacant) and now states that it will take 4 weeks to get an appointment but if I want to raise a complaint they will contact me in 48 hours and it will be looked at quicker. Raised a complaint , complaints emailed me within 24 hours to say it will take 7 days till he speaks with me. All I want is power in the property would I be better switching over to EON who supply the gas surely they could sort it out quicker? One thing is for sure I will never bother with Scottish Power ever again.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Cancelling A Teletext Holiday


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5829 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My daughter who is 17 and her friends decided to look into going on holiday in June when they are all 18. So they contacted teletext and enquired about a holiday for the 4 of them. The lady advised them that she could get them a all inclusive deal for 2 weeks in Salou. They could secure the booking with a £1.00. My daughter rang me and asked if she should go ahead and book it and I said as long as it was all in agreemnet then yes. So they went ahead and booked it.

 

When she got home from college she decided to have a look on the website at the hotel - to our horro the write ups on the hotel were appalling. There wasn't a nice thing to say about it. The site also indicated that there had been things stolen from the hotal and the food had been unfit to eat. After lengthy discussions my daughter decided to cancle the booking.

 

She contacted teletext and asked them to cancel it - the operator saiid she needed to ring back the next day and cancel it with a different department.

 

The very next day she rang the department concerned and after a lengthy discussion with the operator she told my daughter that the cancellation had to be in writing, sent recorded delivery and then they would cancel the holiday.

 

Then the bombshell was dropped - she told my daughter that she would have to pay £75.00 per person for cancelling the holiday. My daughter asked why and she was told it is in the terms and conditions of the agreement and the operator who booked you holiday would have told you this. She advised her that nothing had been mentioned about the cancellation fee of £75.00. After only 1 day she was being asked to pay £75.00.

 

After 2 weeks of waiting to find out if the holiday has been cancelled she rang teletext again - they told her because the letter had taken so long to get to them that they would be charging £75.00 per person. As her card id the card they used will it be taken from her?

 

I am incensed that a holiday compnay can charge £75.00 for cancelling a holiday 24 hours after it was booked. There was no other way they would accept the cancellation unless it was in writing. Can they accept a booking of 4 people aged 17? Why wasn't this explained to them on the phone that there was a cancellation fee?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi laineynic,

 

Its standard with most tour operators that when they offer a low deposit, in the case of cancellation you must pay the full deposit. Check any brochure or website and you will find this. It is to entice you to book early.

 

You say that the terms were not explained to your daughter at the time of booking. If she 100% certain, she can request the call records to prove this.

 

Have a look at this thread started by mutley2007, I hope he does not mind me using it:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/holiday-companies/122894-cancellation-customer-going-court.html

 

It is a similar issue - T & C's not explained at time of booking. He got the result he was looking for.

 

As a side note, your daughter read some bad reviews about the hotel? No holiday company will allow cancellation without charges because of bad reviews.

 

Out of interest, can you post the name of the hotel?

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your posting - I understand what your saying but to be made to pay £75 after only 24 hours seems very harsh. Surely there must be some kind of cooling of period. What about the distanc selling laws?

 

At 17 is she legally allowed to ook a hiloday? The T&C'S weren't explaind to them, she has signed nothing. I understand that on friday they ill attempt to take £300 from her bank, even though she has told them that she hasn't the money.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again laineynic,

 

I've never heard of a cooling off period for holidays but if you check the link I gave you that should help a lot.

 

I don't think they have done anything wrong by booking the holiday, as they will all be 18 at the time of departure. What about 18-30 hols? They do it all the time. If she was not legally allowed then the agent would not have been able to go forward with the booking.

 

Remember, Teletext are only the booking agents. Its like going into a travel agent in the high street. They are booking holidays for Tour Operators such as First Choice, Thomson etc so they have to abide by the T & C's laid out by the particular operator.

 

As I said though, if the T & C's were not explained, this is your best bet based on Mutley's experience.

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What about the distanc selling laws?

 

Holidays are exempt. There is no right of cancellation or cooling off period.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know why, I don't make the laws! It's probably to do with the nature of booking holidays - you can't have a 14 day cooling off period when you could have been on the holiday in that time.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have been on the OFT site and it doesnt mention that holidays are exempt from the ruling. If your not sure of the law why state it as being so?

 

I have read other comments fom previous postings and hey used that argument.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am sure of it, and I have never suggested otherwise.

 

The details are on the OFT website. The exceptions are, funnily enough, detailed on the 'exceptions' page.

 

The Office of Fair Trading: Exceptions to the regulations

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To quote from OFT "the provisions do not apply to package travel"

 

laineynic, barracad is trying to help you and as a moderator of this forum I do not think for one minute that he would post without knowing the facts. No point going for the distance selling angle if it does not apply to your daughters case.

As I said before you have two options. Fight them on the lack of info at time of booking - like Mutley did or just take the holiday.

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked baracuda a question which was "why are holidays eempt" he was the one who got on his high horse and said he didn'tmake the rules.

 

I am beginning to wonder wether this sie is as useful as it used to be. I seem to ask the wrong questions and get blasted. I am not an epert and I asked for advise. Instead I get an obnoixous reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a bad day lainey? In response to barracad's reply you asked why they were exempt and his response was simply that he didn't know as he didn't make the laws. You then came back and said "If your not sure of the law why state it as being so?" Barracad did not state that he wasn't sure of the law only that he didn't know why the powers that be exempted them. I think you have misinterpreted things. Go and put the kettle on and have a nice cuppa :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well holidays are exempt - that is the information you were looking for, is it not? As for why a particular law exists then that would not be the kind of thing you can expect to find an answer to here as this would be down to the people who put such laws in place.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

laineynic

 

We have answered your questions the best we can. In all honesty, the only obnoxious reply has been posted by yourself.

Perhaps you need a specialist in travel law to help you further.

 

I wish you and your daughter good luck in finding a resolution.

Loubychew

 

I am not a travel lawyer. All info is based on my own experience of working in the travel industry in resort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just thought i'd update on the latest from the Sun4U saga - we have been in constant contact with the holiday company to have the £75 per person penatly stopped and have got no where. Yesterday we received a letter giving the girls 48 hours to pay the £475 each.

 

We have advised them that they did not advise the girls at anytime of the cancellation penalty. There response was we don't have the time to read out the terms and conditions over te phone. They have now stopped responding to any emails we have sent and the customer services advisor I have been dealing with won't give me details of someone more senior.

 

It seems that many others are falling into the same thing. I just wonder why this is not regulated better. Surely you should be able to change your mind without being penalised especially after only 4 hours.

 

I am completely stumped - it looks like holding out and not paying the £75 has put the girls in a position of having to pay for a holiday that they won't be taking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not saying this would be the correct answer, but have you requested new card details for your DD? I assume the attempted transaction was declined. £75 PP is a joke if you ask me.

 

What do they threaten should they not pay? Could anybody tell me if this is liable for court action? (not that I think they'd bother) only, if they did, the T&C's bit would be on your side, would it not?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

On the 14th April I spoke my daughters friends mum contacted customer services to sort out changing the holiday. Despite being promised that they would move it foc, the told her there would be a charge per person. We even had the persons name who told us she would move it free of charge. After a 15 minute debate we decided that we would give in and pay the £75 charge and use another holiday company. We gave in and asked how to pay. We were told to put it in a email and someone would get back to us with what we need to pay to cancel the holiday.

 

11 days later - no email, no response to the email and the demand letters have stopped. Could it be that they have finally given in? or is this the lull before a storm.

 

I would never ever use Sun4u.com ever again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

 

We have advised them that they did not advise the girls at anytime of the cancellation penalty. There response was we don't have the time to read out the terms and conditions over te phone.

 

Isn't that the get-out for you. Was that said in an e-mail? Isn't it the case that the contract isn't binding until you receive the written t & C. Think of any only purchases. You always have to tick the T & C box.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I am using this against them. Still no response from anyone regarding the cancellation penalty. I have contacted them, and one of the other mums has been in rouch and the correspondnce from them has stopped. No threatening letters or any thing now. I have enough emails from them admitting that they don'r give t&c's over the phone.

 

Thanks bribri

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...